Can nanotechnology deliver the promised benefits without negatively impacting soil microbial life?

Journal of Basic Microbiology

Volumn 54, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 889-904

  Dimkpa, Christian O ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural microbiology; Crops; Metallic nanoparticles; Microbe plant nanoparticle interactions; Nanotechnology

Indexed keywords

METAL; NANOPARTICLE;

AGRICULTURE; BIOTA; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PROCEDURES;

AGRICULTURE; BIOTA; METALS; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT ROOTS; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84908466392     PISSN: 0233111X     EISSN: 15214028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201400298     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Seil, J., Webster, T.J., 2012. Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. Inter. J. Nanomed., 7, 2767-2781.
2. Klaine, S.J., Alvarez, P.J.J., Bailey, G.E., Fernandes, T.F. et al., 2008. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 27, 1825-1851.
3. Savage, N., Diallo, M.S., 2005. Nanomaterials and water purification: opportunities and challenges. J. Nanoparticle Res., 7, 331-342.
4. Ju-Nam, Y., Lead, J.R., 2008. Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Sci. Total Environ., 400, 396-414.
5. Zhu, J., Li, D., Chen, H., Yang, X., et al., 2004. Highly dispersed CuO nanoparticles prepared by a novel quick-precipitation method. Mat. Lett., 58, 3324-3327.
6. Meshram, S.P., Adhyapak, P.V., Mulik, U.P., Amalnerkar, D.P., 2012. Facile synthesis of CuO nanomorphs and their morphology dependent sunlight driven photocatalytic properties. Chem. Eng. J., 204, 158-168.
7. Gogos, A., Knauer, K., Bucheli, T.D., 2012. Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: current state, foreseen applications, and research priorities. J. Agric. Food. Chem., 60, 9781-9792.
8. Giannousi, K., Avramidis, I., Dendrinou-Samara, C., 2013. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of copper based nanoparticles as agrochemicals against Phytophthora infestans. Royal Soc. Chem. Adv., 3, 21743.
9. Kanel, S.R., Manning, B., Charlet, L., Choi, H., 2005. Removal of arsenic(III) from groundwater by nanoscale zerovalent iron. Env. Sci. Technol., 39, 1291-11298.
10. Liu, Y., Majetich, S.A., Tilton, R.D., Sholl, D.S., Lowry, G.V., 2005. TCE dechlorination rates, pathways, and efficiency of nanoscale iron particles with different properties. Env. Sci. Technol, 39, 1338-1345.
11. Kaegi, R., Sinnet, B., Zuleeg, S., Hagendorfer, H., et al., 2005. Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades. Environ. Pollut., 158, 2900-2905.
12. Impellitteri, C.A., Tolaymat, T.M., Scheckel, K.G., 2009. The speciation of silver nanoparticles in antimicrobial fabric before and after exposure to a hypochlorite/detergent solution. J. Environ. Qual., 38, 1528-1530.
13. Farkas, J., Peter, H., Christian, P., Urrea, J.A.G., et al., 2011. Characterization of the effluent from a nanosilver producing washing machine. Environ. Int., 37, 1057-1062.
14. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Britt, D.W., Anderson, A.J., 2012. Bioactivity and biomodification of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles with relevance to plant performance in agriculture. Ind. Biotechnol., 8, 344-357.
15. Dinesh, R., Anandaraj, M., Srinivasan, V., Hamza, S., 2012. Engineered nanoparticles in the soil and their potential implications to microbial activity. Geoderma, 173, 19-27.
16. Jafar, G., Ghasemi Hamzeh, G., 2013. Ecotoxicity of nanomaterials in soil. Annals Biol. Res., 4, 86-92.
17. Thul, S.T., Sarangi, B.K., Pandey, R.A., 2013. Nanotechnology in agroecosystem: implications on plant productivity and its soil environment. Expert Opin. Environ. Biol., 2, 1.
18. Pan, B., Xing, B., 2012. Applications and implications of manufactured nanoparticles in soils: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 437-456.
19. Lin, D., Tian, X., Wu, F., Xing, B., 2010. Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment. J. Environ. Qual., 39, 1896-1908.
20. Stampoulis, D., Sinha, S.K., White, J.C., 2009. Assay-dependent phytotoxicity of nanoparticles to plants. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 9473-9479.
21. Miralles, P., Church, T.L., Harris, A.T., 2012. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9224-9239.
22. Gardea-Torresdey, J.L., Rico, C.M., White, J.C., 2012. Trophic transfer, transformation, and impact of engineered nanomaterials in terrestrial environments. Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 2526-2540.
23. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Martineau, N., Britt, D.W., et al., 2013. Silver nanoparticles disrupt wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth in a sand matrix. Env. Sci. Technol., 47, 1082-1090.
24. Lee, W.M., Kwak, J.I., An Y.J., 2012. Effect of silver nanoparticles in crop plants Phaseolus radiatus and Sorghum bicolor: media effect on phytotoxicity. Chemosphere, 86, 491-499.
25. El-Temsah, Y. S., Joner, E. J., 2012. Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. Environ. Toxicol., 27, 42-49.
26. + at sublethal concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5442-5449.
27. Shaymurat, T., Gu, J., Xu, C., Yang, Z., et al., 2012. Phytotoxic and genotoxic effects of ZnO nanoparticles on garlic (Allium sativum L.): a morphological study. Nanotoxicology, 6, 241-248.
28. Kim, S., Lee, S., Lee, I., 2012. Alteration of phytotoxicity and oxidant stress potential by metal oxide nanoparticles in Cucumis sativus. Water Air Soil Pollut., 223, 2799-2806.
29. Lin, D.H., Xing, B.S., 2008. Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5580-5585.
30. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Latta, D.E., Manangón, E., et al., 2012. CuO and ZnO nanoparticles: phytotoxicity, metal speciation and induction of oxidative stress in sand-grown wheat. J. Nanopart. Res., 14, 1125.
31. Dimkpa, C.O., Latta, D.E., McLean, J.E., Britt, D.W., et al., 2013. Fate of CuO and ZnO nano and micro particles in the plant environment. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 4734-4742.
32. Dimkpa, C.O., Hansen, T, Stewart, J, McLean, J.E., et al., 2014. ZnO nanoparticles and root colonization by a beneficial pseudomonad influence essential metal responses in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Nanotoxicology. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.900583
33. Wang, Z., Xie, X., Zhao, J., Liu, X., et al., 2012. Xylem- and phloem-based transport of CuO nanoparticles in maize (Zea mays L.). Environ. Sci.Technol., 46, 4434-4441.
34. Pandey, A.C., Sanjay, S.S., Yadav, R.S., 2010. Application of ZnO nanoparticles in influencing the growth rate of Cicer arietinum. J. Exp. Nanosci., 5, 488-497.
35. Mukherjee, A., Peralta-Videa, J.R., Bandyopadhyay, S., Rico, C.M., et al., 2014. Physiological effects of nanoparticulate ZnO in green peas (Pisum sativum L.) cultivated in soil. Metallomics, 6, 132-138.
36. Wang, P., Menzies, N.W., Lombi, E., McKenna, B.A., et al., 2013. Fate of ZnO nanoparticles in soils and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 13822-13830.
37. Shaw, A.K., Hossain, Z., 2013. Impact of nano-CuO stress on rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere, 93, 906-915.
38. Atha, D.H., Wang, H., Petersen, E.J., Cleveland, D., et al., 2012. Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 1819-1827.
39. Lee, S., Chung, H., Kim, S., Lee, I., 2013. The genotoxic effect of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles on early growth of buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum. Water Air Soil Pollut., 224, 1668.
40. Asli, S., Neumann, P.M., 2009. Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide nanoparticles can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport. Plant Cell Environ., 32, 577-5584.
41. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. J. Environ. Monit., 13, 822-828.
42. Ardakani, A.S., 2013. Toxicity of silver, titanium and silicon nanoparticles on the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, and growth parameters of tomato. Nematology, 15, 671-677.
43. Jośko, I., Oleszczuk, P., 2013. Influence of soil type and environmental conditions on ZnO, TiO2 and Ni nanoparticles phytotoxicity. Chemosphere, 92, 91-99.
44. 2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 104, 83-91.
45. Gao, F.Q., Hong, F.H., Liu, C., Zheng, L., et al., 2006. Mechanism of nano-anatase TiO2 on promoting photosynthetic carbon reaction of spinach-inducing complex of rubisco-rubisco activase. Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 111, 239-253.
46. Gao, F., Liu, C., Qu, C., Zheng, L., et al., 2008. Was improvement of spinach growth by nano-TiO2 treatment related to the changes of rubisco activase? Biometals, 21, 211-217.
47. Fujishima, A., 2005. Discovery and applications of photocatalysis - creating a comfortable future by making use of light energy (interview). Japan. Nanonet. Bullet., 44.
48. 2 nanoparticles in wheat (Triticum aestivum spp.): influence of diameter and crystal phase. Sci. Total Environ., 431, 197-208.
49. Wang, Q., Ebbs, S.D., Chen, Y.S., Ma, X.M., 2013. Trans-generational impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on tomato plants. Metallomics, 5, 753-759.
50. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7315-7320.
51. Morales, M.I., Rico, C.M., Hernandez-Viezcas, J.A., Nunez, J.E., et al., 2013. toxicity assessment of cerium oxide nanoparticles in cilantro (Coriandrum sativum L.) plants grown in organic soil. J. Agric. Food Chem., 61, 6224-6230.
52. 2 nanoparticles with plants in hydroponic culture. Chemosphere, 91, 512-520.
53. 2, heat shock protein, and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano., 6, 9615-9622.
54. Rico, C.M., Morales, M.I., McCreary, R., Castillo-Michel, H., et al., 2013. Cerium oxide nanoparticles modify the antioxidative stress enzyme activities and macromolecule composition in rice seedlings. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 14110-14118.
55. Rico, C.M., Morales, M.I., Barrios, A.C, McCreary, R., et al., 2013. Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on the quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. J. Agric. Food Chem., 61, 11278-11285.
56. Wang, Q., Ma, X.M., Zhang, W., Pei, H.C., Chen, Y.S., 2012. The impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its implications for food safety. Metallomics, 4, 1105-1112.
57. 3 nanoparticles on photosynthetic characteristic of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.): foliar spray versus soil amendment. Acta Physiol. Plant, 35, 3365-3375.
58. Ghafariyan, M.H., Malakouti, M.J., Dadpour, M.R., Stroeve, P., Mahmoudi, M., 2013. Effects of magnetite nanoparticles on soybean chlorophyll. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10645-10652.
59. Pradhan, S., Patra, P., Das, S., Chandra, S., et al., 2013. Photochemical modulation of biosafe manganese nanoparticles on Vigna radiata: a detailed molecular, biochemical, and biophysical study. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 13122-13131.
60. 4) nanoparticles on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita mixta) plants. Nanotoxicology, 5, 30-42.
61. Sanchez-Alcala, I., del Campillo, M.C., Barron, V., Torrent, J., 2012. Pot evaluation of synthetic nanosiderite for the prevention of iron chlorosis. J. Sci. Food Agric., 92, 1964-1973.
62. Dimkpa, C.O., Britt, D.W., Anderson, A.J., 2011. Disinfection by nanoparticles, in: Manoj, K.R, Andreescu, S, Ding, H. (Eds.), Nanotechnology for Environmental Decontamination, Mcgraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, USA, 448.
63. Lamsal, K., Kim, S.-W., Jung, J.H., Kim, Y.S., et al., 2011. Effects of silver nanoparticles against powdery mildews on cucumber and pumpkin. Mycobiology, 39, 26-232.
64. He, L., Liu, Y., Mustapha, Z., Lin, M., 2012. Antifungal activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum. Microbiol. Res., 166, 207-215.
65. Kairyte, K., Kadys, A., Luksiene, Z., 2013. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of photoactivated ZnO nanoparticles in suspension. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol., 128, 78-84.
66. Jayaseelan, C., Rahuman, A.A., Kirthi, A.V., Marimuthu, S., et al., 2012. Novel microbial route to synthesize ZnO nanoparticles using Aeromonas hydrophila and their activity against pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Spectrochim. ACTA A Mol. Biomol. Spectr., 90, 78-84.
67. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Britt, D.W., Anderson, A.J., 2013. Antifungal activity of ZnO nanoparticles and their interactive effect with a biocontrol bacterium on growth antagonism of the plant pathogen, Fusarium graminearum. BioMetals, 26, 913-924.
68. Savi, G.D., Vitorino, V., Bortoluzzi, A.J., Scussel, V.M., 2013. Effect of zinc compounds on Fusarium verticillioides growth, hyphae alterations, conidia, and fumonisin production. J. Sci. Food Agric., 93, 3395-3402.
69. Ingle, A.P., Duran, N., Rai, M., 2014. Bioactivity, mechanism of action, and cytotoxicity of copper-based nanoparticles: a review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98, 1001-1009.
70. Maurer-Jones, M.A., Gunsolus, I.L., Murphy, C.J., Haynes, C.L., 2013. Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Anal. Chem., 85, 3036-3049.
71. Rousk, J., Ackermann, K., Curling, S.F., Jones, D.L., 2012. Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate CuO and ZnO to soil bacterial communities. PLoS ONE, 7, e34197. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034197
72. 2) engineered nanoparticles on soil microbial biomass and their distribution in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 60, 87-94.
73. Pawlett, M., Ritz, K., Dorey, R.A., Rocks, S., et al. 2013. The impact of zero-valent iron nanoparticles upon soil microbial communities is context dependent. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 20, 1041-1049.
74. Mirzajani, F., Askari, H., Hamzelou, S., Farzaneh, M., Ghassempour, A., 2013. Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. and its rhizosphere bacteria. Ecotoxicol. Env. Safety, 88, 48-54.
75. Gitipour, A., El Badawy, A., Arambewela, M., Miller, B., et al., 2013. The impact of silver nanoparticles on the composting of municipal solid waste. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 14385-14393.
76. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1659-1664.
77. 4 nanoparticles combined with stimulating indigenous microbes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 19, 784-793.
78. He, S.Y., Feng, Y.Z., Ren, H.X., Zhang, Y., et al., 2011. The impact of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles on the soil bacterial community. J. Soil Sediment., 11, 1408-1417.
79. Shah, V., Belozerova, I., 2009. Influence of metal nanoparticles on the soil microbial community and germination of lettuce seeds. Water Air Soil Pollut., 197, 143-148.
80. Karunakaran, G., Suriyaprabha, R., Manivasakan, P., Yuvakkumar, R., et al., 2013. Effect of nanosilica and silicon sources on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, soil nutrients and maize seed germination. IET Nanobiotechnol., 7, 70-77.
81. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles towards Sinorhizobium meliloti, a symbiotic alfalfa associated bacterium: use of advanced microscopic and spectroscopic techniques. J. Hazard. Mater., 241, 379-386.
82. 2 particles on soil nutrient contents and PGPR. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 13, 678-685.
83. Dhas, S.P., Shiny, P.J., Khan, S.S., Mukherjee, A., Chandrasekaran, N., 2013. Toxic behavior of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles on environmental microorganisms. J. Basic Microbiol. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201200316
84. Jiang, W., Mashayekhi, H., Xing, B.S., 2009. Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano- and micro-scaled oxide particles. Environ. Pollut., 157, 1619-1625.
85. 3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 1603-1608.
86. Gajjar, P., Pettee, B., Britt, D.W., Huang, W., et al., 2009. Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J. Biol. Eng., 3, 9.
87. Calder, A.J., Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Britt D.W., et al., 2012. Soil components mitigate the antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles towards a beneficial soil bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6. Sci. Total Environ., 429, 215-222.
88. Dimkpa, C.O., Calder, A., Britt, D.W., McLean, J.E., Anderson, A.J., 2011. Responses of a soil bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 to commercial metal oxide nanoparticles compared with their metal ions. Environ. Pollut., 159, 1749-1756.
89. Dimkpa, C.O., Calder, A., Huang, W., Merugu, S., et al., 2011. Interaction of silver nanoparticles with an environmentally beneficial bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis. J. Hazard. Mater., 188, 428-435.
90. Dimkpa, C.O., Zeng, J., McLean, J.E., Britt, D.W., et al., 2012. Production of indole-3-acetic acid via the indole-3-acetamide pathway in the plant-beneficial bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is inhibited by ZnO nanoparticles but enhanced by CuO nanoparticles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78, 1404-1410.
91. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Britt, D.W., Anderson, A.J., 2012. CuO and ZnO nanoparticles differently affect the secretion of fluorescent siderophores in the beneficial root colonizer Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6. Nanotoxicology, 6, 635-642.
92. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Britt, D.W., Johnson, W.P., et al., 2012. Nano-specific inhibition of pyoverdine siderophore production in Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 by CuO nanoparticles. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 25, 1066-1074.
93. Fang, T., Watson, J.-L., Goodman, J., Dimkpa, C.O., et al., 2013. Does doping with aluminum alter the effects of ZnO nanoparticles on the metabolism of soil pseudomonads? Microbiol. Res., 168, 91-98.
94. Priester, J.H., Ge, Y., Mielke, R.E., Horst, A.M., et al., 2012. Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 2451-2456.
95. Allard, P., Darnajoux, R., Phalyvong, K., Bellenger, J.-P., 2013. Effects of tungsten and titanium oxide nanoparticles on the diazotrophic growth and metals acquisition by Azotobacter vinelandii under molybdenum limiting condition. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2061-2068.
96. Cherchi, C., Gu, A., 2010. Impact of titanium dioxide nanomaterials on nitrogen fixation rate and intracellular nitrogen storage in Anabaena variabilis. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8302-8307.
97. Choi, O., Hu, Z.Q., 2008. Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 4583-4588.
98. Yang, Y., Quensen, J., Mathieu, J., Wang, Q., et al., 2014. Pyrosequencing reveals higher impact of silver nanoparticles than Ag+ on the microbial community structure of activated sludge. Water Res., 48, 317-325.
99. Yuan, Z., Li, J., Cui, L., Xu B., et al., 2013. Interaction of silver nanoparticles with pure nitrifying bacteria. Chemosphere, 90, 1404-1411.
100. Radniecki, T.S., Stankus, D.P., Neigh, A., Nason, J.A., Semprini, L., 2011. Influence of liberated silver from silver nanoparticles on nitrification inhibition of Nitrosomonas europaea. Chemosphere, 85, 43-49.
101. Yang, Y., Wang, J., Xiu, Z.M., Alvarez, P.J.J., 2013. Impacts of silver nanoparticles on cellular and transcriptional activity of nitrogen-cycling bacteria. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 32, 1488-1494.
102. Liang, Z., Das, A., Hu, Z., 2010. Bacterial response to a shock load of nanosilver in an activated sludge treatment system. Water Res., 44, 5432-5438.
103. Wu, D., Shen, Y., Ding, A., Mahmood, Q., et al., 2013. Effects of nanoscale zero-valent iron particles on biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal and microorganisms in activated sludge. J. Hazard. Mater., 262, 649-655.
104. Feng, Y., Cui, X., He, S., Dong, G., et al., 2013. The role of metal nanoparticles in influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi effects on plant growth. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 9496-9504.
105. Gillespie, A.W., Farrell, R.E., Walley, F.L., Ross, A.R.S., et al., 2011. Glomalin-related soil protein contains non-mycorrhizal-related heat-stable proteins, lipids and humic materials. Soil Biol. Biochem., 43, 766-777.
106. Keller, A.A., Wang, H., Zhou, D., Lenihan, H.S., et al., 2010. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1962-1967.
107. 2 on the agronomically-relevant Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Sci. Total Environ., 466, 503-512.
108. Cline, G.R., Reid, C.P.P., Powell, P.E., Szaniszlo, P.J., 1984. Effects of a hydroxamate siderophore on iron absorption by sunflower and sorghum. Plant Physiol., 76, 36-39.
109. Jin, C.W., Li, G.X., Yu, X.H., Zheng, S.J., 2010. Plant Fe status affects the composition of siderophore-secreting microbes in the rhizosphere. Ann. Bot., 105, 835-841.
110. Vansuyt, G., Robin, A., Briat, J.F., Curie, C., Lemanceau, P., 2007. Iron acquisition from Fe-pyoverdine by Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 20, 441-447.
111. Dimkpa, C.O., Merten, D., Svatoš, A., Büchel, G., Kothe, E., 2009. Metal-induced oxidative stress impacting plant growth in contaminated soil is alleviated by microbial siderophores. Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 154-162.
112. Höfte, M., Buysens, S., Koedam, N., Cornelis, P., 1993. Zinc affects siderophore-mediated high-affinity iron uptake systems in the rhizosphere Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2. Biometals, 6, 85-91.
113. Rossbach, S., Wilson, T.L., Kukuk, M.L., Carty, H.A., 2000. Elevated zinc induces siderophore biosynthesis genes and a zntA-like gene in Pseudomonas fluorescens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 191, 61-70.
114. Braud, A., Hoegy, F., Jezequel, K., Lebeau, T., Schalk, I.J., 2009. New insights into the metal specificity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyoverdine-iron uptake pathway. Environ. Microbiol., 11, 1079-1091.
115. Zheng, X., Chen, Y.G., Wu, R., 2011. Long-term effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewater and bacterial community shift in activated sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 7284-7290.
116. Santimano, M.C., Kowshik, M., 2013. Altered growth and enzyme expression profile of ZnO nanoparticles exposed non-target environmentally beneficial bacteria. Environ. Monit. Assess., 185, 7205-7214.
117. Kim, S., Sin, H., Lee, S., Lee, I., 2013. Influence of metal oxide particles on soil enzyme activity and bioaccumulation of two plants. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 23, 1279-1286.
118. Peyrot, C., Wilkinson, K.J., Desrosiers, M., Sauve, S., 2014. Effects of silver nanoparticles on soil enzyme activities with and without added organic matter. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 33, 115-125.
119. Chao, W.S., Gu, Y.-Q., Pautot, V., Bray, E.A., Walling, L.L., 1999. Leucine aminopeptidase RNAs, proteins and activities increase in response to water deficit, salinity and the wound signals, systemin, methyl jasmonate, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol., 120, 979-992.
120. Pautot, V., Holzer, F.M., Reisch, B., Walling, L.L., 1993. Leucine aminopeptidase: An inducible component of the defense response in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90, 9906-9910.
121. Morones, J.R., Elechiguerra, J.L., Camacho, A., Holt, K., et al., 2005. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 16, 2346-2353.
122. Applerot, G., Lellouche, J., Lipovsky, A., Nitzan, Y., et al., 2012. Understanding the antibacterial mechanism of CuO nanoparticles: revealing the route of induced oxidative stress. Small, 8, 3326-3337.
123. McQuillan, J.S., Infante, G.H., Stokes, E., Shaw, A.M., 2012. Silver nanoparticle enhanced silver ion stress response in Escherichia coli K12. Nanotoxicology, 6, 857-866.
124. Yang, W., Shen, C., Ji, Q., An, H., et al., 2009. Food storage material silver nanoparticles interfere with DNA replication fidelity and bind with DNA. Nanotechnology, 20, 085102.
125. +-induced silver stress response in Escherichia coli: a full transcriptomic profile. Nanotoxicology. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2013.870243
126. Mirzajani, F., Askari, H., Hamzelou, S., Schober, Y., et al., 2014. Proteomics study of silver nanoparticles toxicity on Bacillus thuringiensis. Ecotoxicol. Env. Safety, 100, 122-130.
127. Zhao, J., Wang, Z., Dai, Y., Xing, B., 2013. Mitigation of CuO nanoparticle-induced bacterial membrane damage by dissolved organic matter. Water Res., 47, 4169-4178.
128. Haichar, F.Z., Marol, C., Berge, O., Rangel-Castro, J.I., et al., 2008. Plant host habitat and root exudates shape soil bacterial community structure. ISME J., 2, 1221-1230.
129. Yang, C.H., Crowley, D.E., 2000. Rhizosphere microbial community structure in relation to root location and plant iron nutritional status. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 345-351.
130. Jin, C.W., He, Y.F., Tang, C.X., Wu, P., Zheng, S.J., 2006. Mechanism of microbially enhanced Fe acquisition in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Plant Cell Environ., 29, 888-897.
131. Martineau, N., McLean, J.E., Dimkpa, C.O., Britt, D.W., Anderson, A.J., 2014. Components from wheat roots modify the bioactivity of ZnO and CuO NPs in a soil bacterium. Environ. Pollut. 187, 65-72.
132. 2 nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ., 408, 1766-1768.
133. Joshi, N., Ngwenya, B.T., French, C.E., 2012. Enhanced resistance to nanoparticle toxicity is conferred by overproduction of extracellular polymeric substances. J. Hazard. Mater., 241-242, 363-370.
134. Ha, J.Y., Gelabert, A., Spormann, A.M., Brown, G.E., Jr., 2010. Role of extracellular polymeric substances in metal ion complexation on Shewanella oneidensis: batch uptake, thermodynamic modeling, ATR-FTIR, and EXAFS study. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, 1-15.