The congruency sequence effect 3.0: A critical test of conflict adaptation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Duthoo, Wout ^a   Abrahamse, Elger L ^a   Braem, Senne ^a   Boehler, C Nico ^a   Notebaert, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISODIC MEMORY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FLANKER TASK; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908400604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110462     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch D.M., Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624-652.
2. Verguts T, Notebaert W (2008) Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychol Rev 115: 518-525.
3. Verguts T, Notebaert W (2009) Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 252-257.
4. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen 121: 480-506.
5. Egner T (2007) Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 7: 380-390.
6. Egner T (2008) Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 380-390.
7. Stürmer B, Leuthold H, Soetens E., Schröter H, Sommer W (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28: 1345-1363.
8. Notebaert W, Verguts T (2008) Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition 106: 1071-1080.
9. Kerns JG, Cohen JD, MacDonald A.W., Cho RY, Stenger VA, et al. (2004) Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303: 1023-1026.
10. Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S (2004) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306: 443-447.
11. Mayr U, Awh E, Laurey P (2003) Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat Neurosci 6: 450-452.
12. Hommel B (1998) Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Vis cogn 5: 183-216.
13. Hommel B, Proctor RW, Vu KPL (2004) A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol Res 68: 1-17.
14. Akçay C, Hazeltine E (2007) Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychon Bull Rev 14: 742-748.
15. Akçay Ç, Hazeltine E (2011) Domain-specific conflict adaptation without feature repetitions. Psychon Bull Rev 18: 505-511.
16. Notebaert W, Verguts T (2006) Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychon Bull Rev 13: 1078-1084.
17. Ullsperger M, Bylsma LM, Botvinick MM (2005) The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 5: 467-472.
18. Wühr P (2005) Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 282-288.
19. Chen S, Melara RD (2009) Sequential effects in the Simon task: Conflict adaptation or feature integration? Brain Res 1297: 89-100.
20. Nieuwenhuis S, Stins JF, Posthuma D, Polderman TJC, Boomsma DI, et al. (2006) Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming? Mem Cognit 34: 1260-1272.
21. Duthoo W, Notebaert W (2012) Conflict adaptation: It is not what you expect. Q J Exp Psychol 65: 1993-2007.
22. Mordkoff JT (2012) Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation. Psychon Bull Rev 19: 750-757.
23. Schmidt JR (2013) Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychon Bull Rev 20: 615-630.
24. Schmidt JR, Besner D (2008) The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 514-523.
25. Schmidt JR, De Houwer J (2011) Now you see it, now you don9t: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) 138: 176-186.
26. Stevens M, Lammertyn J, Verbruggen F., Vandierendonck A (2006) Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS windows platform. Behav Res Methods 38: 280-286.
27. Duyck W, Anseel F, Szmalec A., Mestdagh P, Tavernier A, et al. (2008) Improving accuracy in detecting acoustic onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34: 1317-1326.
28. Severens E, Lommel S Van, Ratinckx E, Hartsuiker RJ (2005) Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychol (Amst) 119: 159-187.
29. Mayr U, Awh E (2009) The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychol Res 73: 794-802.
30. Mattler U (2003) Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials. Exp Brain Res 151: 272-288.
31. Holmes AJ, Pizzagalli DA (2008) Response conflict and frontocingulate dysfunction in unmedicated participants with major depression. Neuropsycho-logia 46: 2904-2913.
32. Duthoo W, Braem S, Houtman F., Schouppe N, Santens P, et al. (2013) Dopaminergic medication counteracts conflict adaptation in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology 27: 556-561.
33. Schmidt JR, De Houwer J (2012) Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task? Q J Exp Psychol 65: 408-425.
34. Duthoo W, Wühr P, Notebaert W (2013) The hot-hand fallacy in cognitive control: Repetition expectancy modulates the congruency sequence effect.
35. Bugg JM (2014) Conflict-triggered top-down control: Default mode, last resort, or no such thing? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 40: 567-587.
36. Schlaghecken F, Martini P (2012) Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38: 272-278.
37. Verguts T, Notebaert W, Kunde W., Wühr P (2011) Post-conflict slowing: Cognitive adaptation after conflict processing. Psychon Bull Rev 18: 76-82.