Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 151, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 272-288

  Mattler, Uwe ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Flanker compatibility effect; Focused attention; Humans; Information processing models; Lateralized motor readiness potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MOTOR SYSTEM; MUSCLE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0038235609     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1486-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Band GP, Boxtel GJ van (1999) Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychol 101:179-211
2. Berg P (1986) The residual after correcting event-related potentials for blink artifacts. Psychophysiology 23:354-364
3. Cohen A, Shoup RE (1993) Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task. Percept Psychophys 53:693-703
4. Coles MGH (1989) Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology physiology and cognition. Psychophysiology 26 251-269
5. Coles MGH, Gratton G, Bashore TR, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1985) A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous-flow model of human information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:529-553
6. Coles MGH, Gratton G, Donchin E (1988) Detecting early communication: using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biol Psychol 26:69-89
7. De Jong R, Liang CC, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:731-750
8. Eimer M (1995) Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:837-854
9. Eimer M, Schlaghecken F (1998) Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1737-1747
10. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a no-search task. Percept Psychophys 16:143-149
11. Eriksen CW, Schultz DW (1979) Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys 25:249-263
12. Eriksen CW, Coles MGH, Morris LR, O'Hara WP (1985) An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bull Psychon Soc 23:165-168
13. Flowers JH (1990) Priming effects in perceptual classification. Percept Psychophys 47:135-148
14. Flowers JH, Wilcox N (1982) The effect of flanking context on visual classification: the joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels. Percept Psychophys 32:581-591
15. Gehring WJ, Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1992) Probability effects on stimulus evaluation and response processes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:198-216
16. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Sirevaag EJ, Eriksen CW, Donchin E (1988) Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:331-344
17. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:480-506
18. Hommel B (1993) The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for temporal overlap. Psychol Res 55:280-290
19. Jasper HH (1958) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10:371-375
20. Kopp B, Mattler U, Goertz R, Rist F (1996a) N2 P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a no-go task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99:19-27
21. Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U (1996b) N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioural tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology 33:282-294
22. Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253-270
23. Kornblum S, Stevens, GT, Wipple A, Requin J (1999) The effects of irrelevant stimuli. 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:688-714
24. Miller JO (1988) Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychol 67:191-257
25. Miller JO (1991) The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle attentional focus visual transients and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions. Percept Psychophys 49:270-288
26. Miller JO, Hackley SA (1992) Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:195-209
27. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA (1983) Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways? Trends Neurosci 6:414-417
28. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113
29. Osman A, Bashore TR, Coles MGH, Donchin E, Meyer DE (1992) On the transmission of partial information: inferences from movement-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:217-232
30. Osman A, Moore CM, Ulrich R (1995) Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychol 90:111-127
31. Ratcliff R (1979) Group reaction time distributions and analysis of distribution statistics. Psychol Bull 86:446-461
32. Ridderinkhof KR (2002) Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. (Attention and performance, XIX) Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 494-519
33. Ridderinkhof KR, Molen MW van der, Bashore TR (1995) Limits on the application of additive factors logic: violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing, Acta Psychol 90:29-48
34. Smid HGOM, Mulder G, Mulder LJM (1990) Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychol 74:169-201
35. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643-662
36. Taylor DA (1977) Time course of context effects. J Exp Psychol Gen 106:404-426