Conflict adaptation: It is not what you expect

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1993-2007

  Duthoo, Wout ^a   Notebaert, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Conflict adaptation; Congruency sequence effect; Expectancy

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; CONFLICT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; STUDENT; TIME PERCEPTION; UNIVERSITY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; STUDENTS; TIME PERCEPTION; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84866345678     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676655     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aarts, E., & Roelofs, A. (2011). Attentional control in anterior cingulate cortex based on probabilistic cueing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 716-727.
2. Akçay, Ç and Hazeltine, E. 2007. Feature-overlap and conflict monitoring: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14: 742-748.
3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S. and Cohen, J. D. 2001. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108: 624-652.
4. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R. and Burgess, G. C. 2007. "Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control". In Variation in working memory, Edited by: Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A. and Towse, J. N. 76-106. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. Bugg, J. M. and Chanani, S. 2011. List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from the picture-word Stroop. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5: 930-936.
6. Chen, S. and Melara, R. D. 2009. Sequential effects in the Simon task: Conflict adaptation or feature integration?. Brain Research, 1297: 89-100.
7. Correa, Á, Rao, A. and Nobre, A. C. 2009. Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus-response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21: 1461-1472.
8. De Pisapia, N. and Braver, T. S. 2006. A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing, 69: 1322-1326.
9. Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Thomas, K. M., Worden, M. S., Tottenham, N.Martinez, A. 2003. Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 20: 2135-2141.
10. Dutzi, I. B. and Hommel, B. 2009. The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research, 73: 425-435.
11. Duyck, W., Anseel, F., Szmalec, A., Mestdagh, P., Tavernier, A. and Hartsuiker, R. J. 2008. Improving accuracy in detecting acoustic onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 1317-1326.
12. Egner, T. 2007. Congruency effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7: 380-390.
13. Egner, T., Ely, S., & Grinband, J. (2010). Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 154. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00154
14. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. and Donchin, E. 1992. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121: 480-506.
15. Hommel, B. 1998. Event fi{ligature}les: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5: 183-216.
16. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. 2001. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 849-878.
17. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W. and Vu, K.-P. L. 2004. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68: 1-17.
18. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W. III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A. and Carter, C. S. 2004. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303: 1023-1026.
19. Kunde, W. and Wühr, P. 2006. Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34: 356-367.
20. Mayr, U., Awh, E. and Laurey, P. 2003. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 450-452.
21. Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I. and De Geus, E. J. 2006. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?. Memory & Cognition, 34: 1260-1272.
22. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F. and Liefooghe, B. 2006. Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13: 112-117.
23. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E. and Melis, A. 2001. Sequential analysis of a Simon task-Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65: 170-184.
24. Notebaert, W. and Verguts, T. 2006. Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13: 1078-1084.
25. Notebaert, W. and Verguts, T. 2007. Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33: 1256-1260.
26. Remington, R. J. 1969. Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82: 250-257.
27. Schlaghecken, F., & Martini, P. (2012). Context, not conflict, drives cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 272-278.
28. Stevens, M., Lammertyn, J., Verbruggen, F. and Vandierendonk, A. 2006. Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods, 38: 280-286.
29. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H. and Sommer, W. 2002. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28: 1345-1363.
30. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M. and Botvinick, M. M. 2005. The conflict-adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5: 467-472.
31. Verguts, T. and Notebaert, W. 2008. Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review, 115: 518-525.
32. Verguts, T. and Notebaert, W. 2009. Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13: 252-257.
33. Wendt, M. and Kiesel, A. 2011. Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18: 910-916.
34. Wühr, P. 2005. Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12: 282-288.
35. Wühr, P. and Kunde, W. 2008. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 872-883.