Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: Technical aspects

Human Reproduction

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3181-3185

  Magli, M Cristina ^a   Montag, Markus ^b   Kster, Maria ^b   Muzi, Luigi ^a   Geraedts, Joep ^c   Collins, John ^d   Goossens, Veerle ^e   Handyside, Alan H ^f,g   Harper, Joyce ^h,i   Repping, Sjoerd ^j   Schmutzler, Andreas ^k   Vesela, Katerina ^l   Gianaroli, Luca ^a  

^a SISMER   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology ESHRE   (Belgium)

^f London Bridge Fertility   (United Kingdom)

^g ILLUMINA INC   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^l Sanatorium Repromeda   (Czech Republic)

more..

Author keywords

aneuploidy; array CGH; biopsy; oocyte; polar body

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LASER; MECHANICAL PROBE; OOCYTE;

EID: 80054931755     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der295     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Handyside A, Staessen C, Harper J, Schmutzler A, Collins J, Goossens V et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Hum Reprod 2011; (In press).
2. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munne S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril 1999;72:837-844. (Pubitemid 29505447)
3. Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Crippa A, Lappi M, Feliciani E, Gianaroli L. First meiosis errors in immature oocytes generated by stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril 2006;86:629-635. (Pubitemid 44306998)
4. Magli MC, Lappi M, Ferraretti AP, Capoti A, Ruberti A, Gianaroli L. Impact of oocyte cryopreservation on embryo development. Fertil Steril 2010; 93:510-516.
5. Montag M, van der Ven K, van der Ven H. Polar body biopsy. In: Harper J (ed). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, 2009, 166-174.
6. Montag MMK, Nikolov A, van der Ven H. Time-lapse based evaluation of human oocytes from ICSI up to the pronuclear stage. Hum Reprod 2010; 25i:180.
7. Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2185-2191. (Pubitemid 24012822)
8. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Velilla E, Walmsley R, Sadowy S, Cohen J, Sable D. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:91-97. (Pubitemid 36874416)