Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-prognosis patients

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 219-225

  Verlinsky, Y ^a   Tur Kaspa, I ^a   Cieslak, J ^a   Bernal, A ^a   Morris, R ^a   Taranissi, M ^a   Kaplan, B ^a   Kuliev, Anver ^a  

^a REPRODUCTIVE GENETICS INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosomal disorders; FISH; Implantation rate; Preimplantation genetics diagnosis; Spontaneous abortion rate; Take home baby rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME DISORDER; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NIDATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCTION; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

EID: 23144438542     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60961-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cieslak J, Tur-Kaspa I, Ilkevitch Y et al. 2005 Developmental potential of embryos after one to three biopsy procedures for PGD. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (suppl. 2), 17 (abstract).
2. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munné S 1999 Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertility and Sterility 72, 837-844.
3. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. 2004 The beneficial effects of PGD for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10, 633-640.
4. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y 2004 Thirteen years' experience of preimplantation diagnosis: report of the Fifth International Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 229-235.
5. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Illewitch Y, Verlinsky Y 2003 Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis of age-related aneuploidies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 54-59.
6. Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L et al. 2000 Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Human Reproduction 15, 1781-1786.
7. Munné S, Magli C, Cohen J et al. 1999 Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Human Reproduction 14, 2191-2199.
8. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T 2000 Outcome of premplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertility and Sterility 73, 1209-1218.
9. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. 2003 Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7, 91-97.
10. Munné S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M 2004 Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 81-90.
11. PEPI 2005 Programs for epidemiologists. Latest version available from http://www.sagebrushpress.com/pepibook.html [accessed 23 June 2005].
12. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M et al. 2001 Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Human Reproduction 16, 1954-1958.
13. Verlinsky Y, Kuliev A 2004 Atlas of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, London and New York, p. 288.
14. Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Evsikov S et al., 2002 Nuclear transfer for full karyotyping and preimplantation diagnosis of translocations. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 5, 300-305.
15. Verlinsky Y, Munné S, Cohen J et al. 2004 Over a decade of preimplantation genetic diagnosis experience - A multi-center report. Fertility and Sterility 82, 292-294.