Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy by testing 12 chromosomes

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 532-538

  Colls, Pere ^a   Goodall, N ^a   Zheng, X ^a   Munne S ^a  

^a Reprogenetics LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; FISH; Pregnancy rate; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 14; CHROMOSOME 15; CHROMOSOME 16; CHROMOSOME 17; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 20; CHROMOSOME 21; CHROMOSOME 22; CHROMOSOME 8; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EMBRYO; PREGNANCY RATE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SCREENING TEST; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

EID: 70449123725     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abdelhadi I, Colls P, Sandalinas M et al. 2003 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 226-231. (Pubitemid 36857154)
2. Agerholm IE, Hnida C, Crüger DG et al. 2008 Nuclei size in relation to nuclear status and aneuploidy rate for 13 chromosomes in donated four cells embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 25, 95-102.
3. Agerholm IE, Ziebe S, Williams B et al. 2005 Sequential FISH analysis using competitive displacement of labelled peptide nucleic acid probes for eight chromosomes in human blastomeres. Human Reproduction 20, 1072-1077. (Pubitemid 40667858)
4. Baart E, Van Opstal D, Los FJ et al. 2004 Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5. Human Reproduction 19, 685-693. (Pubitemid 38344536)
5. Chandley AC 1981 The origin of chromosomal aberrations in man and their potential for survival and reproduction in the adult human population. Annales de Génétique 24, 5-11.
6. Cohen J, Grifo J 2007 Multicenter trial of preimplantation genetic screening reported in the New England Journal of Medicine: an in-depth look at the findings. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 15, 365-366.
7. Cohen J, Wells D, Munné S 2007 Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertility and Sterility 87, 496-503. (Pubitemid 46389618)
8. Colls P, Escudero T, Cekleniak N et al. 2007 Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility using 'no result rescue'. Fertility and Sterility 88, 53-61.
9. Coulam CB, Jeyendram RS, Fiddler M, Pergament E 2007 Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 24, 37-41. (Pubitemid 46213650)
10. De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A 2001 Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis 21, 767-780.
11. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R et al. 2008 Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Human Reproduction 23, 2596-2608.
12. Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A et al. 2008 Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction 23, 481-492. (Pubitemid 351651197)
13. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y 2007 Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomal disorders on reproductive outcome. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 16, 9-10.
14. Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA 2008 Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplanation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility 89, 353-357.
15. Liu J, Tsai YL, Zheng XZ et al. 1998 Feasibility study of repeated fluorescent in-situ hybridization in the same human blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Molecular Human Reproduction 10, 972-977. (Pubitemid 28475253)
16. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferrareti AP et al. 2004 The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. Human Reproduction 19, 1163-1169. (Pubitemid 38618499)
17. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Van Echten-Arends J et al. 2007 Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age. New England Journal of Medicine 357, 9-17.
18. Munné S, Weier HU 1996 Simultaneous enumeration of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y in interphase cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 75, 263-270.
19. Munné S, Gianaroli L, Tur-Kaspa I et al. 2007 Sub-standard application of PGS may interfere with its clinical success. Fertility and Sterility 88, 781-784.
20. Munné S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M et al. 2004 Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 81-90. (Pubitemid 38100694)
21. Munné S, Marquez C, Magli C et al. 1998 Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Molecular Human Reproduction 4, 863-870.
22. Munné S, Magli C, Bahce M et al. 1998 Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22. Prenatal Diagnosis 18, 1459-1466.
23. Munné S, Marquez C, Reing A et al. 1998 Chromosomes abnormalities in embryos obtained after conventional in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility 69, 904-908. (Pubitemid 28193928)
24. Munné S, Dailey T, Sultan KM et al. 1998 The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Human Reproduction 10, 1014-1020.
25. Munné S, Grifo J, Cohen J, Weier HU 1994 Chromosome abnormalities in human arrested preimplantation embryos: a multiple-probe FISH study. American Journal of Human Genetics 55, 150-159.
26. Munné S, Weier HU, Stein J et al. 1993 A fast and efficient method for simultaneous X and Y in-situ hybridization of human blastomeres. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10, 82-90.
27. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society 2007. Guidelines for good practice in PGD: programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 16, 134-147.
28. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M et al. 2001 Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Human Reproduction 16, 1954-1958. (Pubitemid 32916228)
29. Simpson JL 2008 The randomized clinical trial in assessing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): necessary but not sufficient. Human Reproduction 23, 2179-2181.
30. Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al. 2004 Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 19, 2849-2858. (Pubitemid 40028958)
31. Velilla E, Escudero T, Munné S 2002 Blastomere fixation techniques and risk of misdiagnosis for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 4, 210-217.
32. Vollmer M, Wenzel F, DeGeyter C et al. 2000 Assessing the chromosome copy number in metaphase II oocytes by sequential fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10, 596-602. (Pubitemid 32066682)
33. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, Strobino B 1986 Cytogenetic abnormalities in spontaneous abortions of recognized conceptions. In: Porter IH, Willey A, editors Perinatal Genetics: Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Academic Press; 1986. p. 133-148.
34. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B et al. 2002 First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility 78, 543-549. (Pubitemid 35041586)
35. West JD, Gosden JR, Angell RR et al. 1987 Sexing the human pre-embryo by DNA-DNA in-situ hybridization. Lancet 13, 1345-1347.
36. Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A et al. 2003 FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y, in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Human Reproduction 18, 2575-2581.