Cognitive biases and design effects in experimental auctions: An application to GM rice with health benefits

China Agricultural Economic Review

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 413-432

  De Steur, Hans ^a   Vanhonacker, Filiep ^a   Feng, Shuyi ^b   Shi, Xiaoping ^b   Verbeke, Wim ^a   Gellynck, Xavier ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

China; Cognitive bias; Design effect; Experimental auctions; Genetically modified rice; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908190787     PISSN: 1756137X     EISSN: 17561388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/CAER-08-2013-0116     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alavi, S., Bugusu, B., Cramer, G., Dary, O., Lee, T.-C., Martin, L., McEntire, J. andWailes, E. (2008), Rice Fortification in Developing Countries: ACritical Review of the Technical and Economic Feasibility, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.
2. Blancquaert, D., Storozhenko, S., Loizeau, K., De Steur, H., De Brouwer, V., Viaene, J., Ravanel, S., Rebeille, F., Lambert, W. and Van Der Straeten, D. (2010), "Folates and folic acid: from fundamental research towards sustainable health", Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 14-35.
3. Brown, T.C. (2005), "Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 367-379.
4. Brown, T.C. and Gregory, R. (1999), "Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters", Ecological Economics, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 323-335.
5. Buda, R. and Zhang, Y. (2000), "Consumer product evaluation: the interactive effect of message framing, presentation order, and source credibility", Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 229-242.
6. Chavalarias, D. and Ioannidis, J. (2010), "Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 63 No. 11, pp. 1205-1215.
7. Cherry, T., Frykblom, P., Shogren, J., List, J. and Sullivan, M. (2004), "Laboratory testbeds and non-market valuation: the case of bidding behavior in a second-price auction with an outside option", Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 285-294.
8. Corrigan, J.R. and Rousu, M.C. (2006a), "The effect of initial endowments in experimental auctions", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 448-457.
9. Corrigan, J.R. and Rousu, M.C. (2006b), "Posted prices and bid affiliation: evidence from experimental auctions", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 88 No. 4, pp. 1078-1090.
10. Corrigan, J.R., Depositario, D.P.T., Nayga, R.M., Wu, X. and Laude, T.P. (2009), "Comparing openended choice experiments and experimental auctions: an application to golden rice", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 91 No. 3, pp. 837-853.
11. Crowne, D.P. and Marlowe, D. (1960), "A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology", Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 349-354.
12. De Groote, H., Kimenju, S. and Morawetz, U. (2011), "Estimating consumer willingness to pay for food quality with experimental auctions: the case of yellow versus fortified maize meal in Kenya", Agricultural Economics, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 1-16.
13. De Steur, H., Feng, S., Xiaoping, S. and Gellynck, X. (2014), "Consumer preferences for micronutrient strategies in China. A comparison between folic acid supplementation and folate biofortification", Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 1410-1420.
14. De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Feng, S., Rutsaert, P. and Verbeke, W. (2012b), "Determinants of willingness-to-pay for GM rice with health benefits in a high-risk region: Evidence from experimental auctions for folate biofortified rice in China", Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 87-94.
15. De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Blancquaert, D., Lambert, W., Van Der Straeten, D. and Qaim, M. (2012a), "Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of multi-biofortified rice in China", New Biotechnology, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 432-442.
16. De Steur, H., Gellynck, X., Storozhenko, S., Liqun, G., Lambert, W., Van Der Straeten, D. and Viaene, J. (2010), "The health benefits of folate biofortified rice in China", Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 554-556.
17. Demont, M., Rutsaert, P., Ndour, M., Verbeke,W., Seck, P.A. and Tollens, E. (2013), "Experimental auctions, collective induction and choice shift: willingness-to-pay for rice quality in Senegal", European Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 261-286.
18. Demont, M., Zossou, E., Rutsaert, P., Ndour, M., Van Mele, P. and Verbeke, W. (2012), "Consumer valuation of improved rice parboiling technologies in Benin", Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 63-70.
19. Depositario, D.P.T., Nayga, R.M., Wu, X. and Laude, T.P. (2009), "Effects of information on consumers' willingness to pay for golden rice", Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 457-476.
20. Drichoutis, A., Lazaridis, P. and Nayga, R.M. (2008), "The role of reference prices in experimental auctions", Economics Letters, Vol. 99 No. 3, pp. 446-448.
21. Drichoutis, A., Nayga, R.M. and Lazaridis, P. (2011), "The role of training in experimental auctions", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93 No. 2, pp. 521-527.
22. Ehrhart, K.-M., Ott, M. and Abele, S. (2008), "Auction fever: theory and experimental evidence", SFB 504 Discussion Paper Series No. 08-27, Mannheim University, Mannheim.
23. Eysenck, S., Eysenck, H. and Barrett, P. (1985), "A revised version of the psychoticism scale", Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 21-29.
24. Fisher, R. (1993), "Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning", The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 303-315.
25. Fox, J.A. (1995), "Determinants of consumer acceptability of bovine somatotropine", Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 51-62.
26. Fox, J.A., Hayes, D.J. and Shogren, J.F. (2002), "Consumer preferences for food irradiation: how favorable and unfavorable descriptions affect preferences for irradiated pork in experimental auctions", The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 75-95.
27. Hanemann, W.M. (1991), "Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?", American Economic Review, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 635-647.
28. Harrison, G., Harstad, R. and Rutström, E. (2004), "Experimental methods and elicitation of values", Experimental Economics, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 123-140.
29. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Ealgy, A.H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M.J. and Merrill, L. (2009), "Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 135 No. 4, pp. 555-588.
30. Hobbs, J., Sanderson, K. and Haghiri, M. (2006), "Evaluating willingness-to-pay for Bison attributes: an experimental auction approach", Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 269-287.
31. Hoffman, E., Menkhaus, D., Chakravarti, D., Field, R. and Whipple, G. (1993), "Using laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research: a case study of new packaging for fresh beef", Marketing Science, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 318-338.
32. Horowitz, J.K. and McConnell, K.E. (2002), "A review of WTA/WTP studies", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 426-447.
33. Hu, W., Zhong, F. and Ding, Y. (2006), "Actual media reports on GM foods and Chinese consumers' willingness to pay for GM soybean oil", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 376-390.
34. Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F., Rousu, M.C. and Tegene, A. (2003), "Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food labels in a market with diverse information: evidence from experimental auctions", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 481-502.
35. Jaeger, S.R., Lusk, J.L., House, L.O., Valli, C., Moore, M., Morrow, B. and Bruce Traill, W. (2004), "The use of non-hypothetical experimental markets for measuring the acceptance of genetically modified foods", Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 701-714.
36. Koszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006), "A model of reference-dependent preferences", Quarterly Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 121 No. 4, pp. 1133-1165.
37. Ku, G., Malhotra, D. and Murnighan, J.K. (2005), "Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: a study of auction fever in live and internet auctions", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 96 No. 2, pp. 89-103.
38. Leggett, C., Kleckner, N., Boyle, K., Duffield, J. and Mitchell, R. (2003), "Social desirability bias in contingent valuation surveys administered through in-person interviews", Land Economics, Vol. 79 No. 4, pp. 561-575.
39. Li, Z. and Hao, L. (2008), "National neural tube defects prevention program in China", Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. S196-S204.
40. List, J.A. (2002), "Preference reversals of a different kind: the 'more is less' phenomenon", American Economic Review, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 1636-1643.
41. List, J.A. and Shogren, J.F. (1999), "Price information and bidding behavior in repeated second-price auctions", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 81 No. 4, pp. 942-949.
42. Lusk, J.L. and Fox, J.A. (2003), "Value elicitation in retail and laboratory environments", Economics Letters, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 27-34.
43. Lusk, J.L. and Hudson, D. (2004), "Willingness-to-pay estimates and their relevance to agribusiness decision making", Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 152-169.
44. Lusk, J.L. and Norwood, F.B. (2009), "Direct versus indirect questioning: an application to the well-being of farm animals", Social Indicators Research, Vol. 96 No. 3, pp. 551-565.
45. Lusk, J.L. and Rousu, M.C. (2006), "Market price endogeneity and accuracy of value elicitation mechanisms", in List, J. (Ed.), Using Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Edward Elger Publishing, Hants.
46. Lusk, J.L. and Shogren, J.F. (2007), Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Lusk, J.L., Feldkamp, T. and Schroeder, T.C. (2004), "Experimental auction procedure: impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 389-405.
48. Lusk, J.L., Fox, J.A., Schroeder, T.C., Mintert, J. and Koohmaraie, M. (2001), "In-store valuation of steak tenderness", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 83 No. 3, pp. 539-550.
49. Lusk, J.L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M. and Taulman, L. (2005), "A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 28-44.
50. Malhotra, D., Ku, G. and Murnighan, J.K. (2008), "When winning is everything", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 5, pp. 78-86.
51. Norwood, F.B. and Lusk, J.L. (2011), "Social desirability bias in real, hypothetical, and inferred valuation experiments", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93 No. 2, pp. 528-534.
52. Noussair, C., Ruffieux, B. and Robin, S. (2004), "Revealing consumers' willingness to pay: a comparison of the BDM mechanism and the vickrey auction", Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 725-741.
53. Nunes, J.C. and Boatwright, P. (2004), "Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 41 No. 41, pp. 457-466.
54. Parkhurst, G., Shogren, J. and Dickinson, D. (2004), "Negative values in vickrey auctions", Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 86 No. 1, pp. 222-235.
55. Plott, C.R. and Zeiler, K. (2005), "The willingness to pay - willingness to accept gap, the 'endowment effect', subject misconceptions and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations", American Economic Review, Vol. 95 No. 3, pp. 530-545.
56. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), "Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903.
57. Prelec, D. (1990), "A "pseudo-endowment" effect and its implications for some recent nonexpected utility models", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 247-259.
58. Roosen, J., Fox, J.A., Hennessy, D. and Schreiber, A. (1998), "Consumers' valuation of insecticide use restrictions: an application to apples", Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 367-384.
59. Rousu, M.C., Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F. and Tegene, A. (2004), "Estimating the public value of conflicting information: the case of genetically modified foods", Land Economics, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 125-135.
60. Rousu, M.C., Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F. and Tegene, A. (2007), "Effects and value of verifiable information in a controversial market: evidence from lab auctions of genetically modified food", Economic Inquiry, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 409-432.
61. Rozin, P. and Royzman, E.B. (2001), "Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion", Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 296-320.
62. Rutström, E. (1998), "Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design", International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 427-441.
63. Shogren, J.F., Fox, J.A., Hayes, D.J. and Roosen, J. (1999), "Observed choices for food safety in retail, survey and auction markets", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 81 No. 5, pp. 1192-1199.
64. Shogren, J.F., Margolis, M., Koo, C. and List, J.A. (2001b), "A random nth price auction", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 46, pp. 409-421.
65. Shogren, J.F., Cho, S., Koo, C., List, J.A., Park, C., Polo, P. and Wilhelmi, R. (2001a), "Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA", Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 97-100.
66. Smith, S.M. and Petty, R.E. (1996), "Message framing and persuasion: a message process analysis", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 257-268.
67. Stein, A.J., Sachdev, H.P.S. and Qaim, M. (2006), "Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of golden rice", Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 24 No. 10, pp. 1200-1201.
68. Storozhenko, S., De Brouwer, V., Volckaert, M., Navarrete, O., Blancquaert, D., Zhang, G.-F., Lambert, W. and Van Der Straeten, D. (2007), "Folate fortification of rice by metabolic engineering", Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 25 No. 11, pp. 1277-1279.
69. Tegene, A., Huffman, W.E., Rousu, M.C. and Shogren, J.F. (2003), The Effects of Information on Consumer Demand for Biotech Foods: Evidence from Experimental Auctions. ERS/USDA Research Briefs Technical Bulletin No 1903, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
70. Umberger, W.J. and Feuz, D.M. (2004), "The usefulness of experimental auctions in determining consumers' willingness to pay for quality differentiated products", Review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 170-185.
71. Zhang, L., Ren, A., Li, Z., Hao, L., Tian, Y. and Li, Z. (2006), "Folate concentrations and folic acid supplementation among women in their first trimester of pregnancy in a rural area with a high prevalence of neural tube defects in Shanxi, China", Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, Vol. 76 No. 6, pp. 461-466.