Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1205-1215

  Chavalarias, David ^a,b   Ioannidis, John P A ^c,d  

^a Centre de Recherche en Epistemologie Appliquee Ecole Polytechnique   (France)

^b De Paris Ile de France   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

^d TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Biomedical literature; Clustering; Directed clique; Mapping; Text mining

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RESPONSE VARIABLE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; HUMANS; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBMED; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 77956950113     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J.P. Ioannidis Why most published research findings are false PLoS Med 2 2005 e124
2. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, R. Kunz, G.E. Vist, Y. Falck-Ytter, H.J. Schunemann GRADE Working Group What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336 2008 995 998
3. D.L. Sackett Bias in analytic research J Chronic Dis 32 1979 51 63
4. D. Chavalarias, and J-P. Cointet Bottom-up scientific field detection for dynamical and hierarchical science mapping - methodology and case study Scientometrics 75 2008 37 50
5. G. Palla, I.J. Farkas, P. Pollner, I. Derényi, and T. Vicsek Directed network modules New J Physics 9 2007 186
6. Clusters & communities: overlapping dense groups in networks. Available at: http://www.cfinder.org
7. Chavalarias D, Cointet J-P. The reconstruction of science phylogeny. arXiv:0904.3154v2 [physics.soc-ph].
8. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M, Gephi: an open source software for exploring and maintaining networks. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2009. Available at: http://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/ view/154.
9. J.-P. Cointet, and D. Chavalarias Multi-level science mapping with asymmetric co-occurrence analysis: methodology and case study Networks and Heterogeneous Media 3 2008 267 276
10. MOMA. Module Mapping for large electronic corpora and social media. Available at: http://sciencemapping.com.
11. Pajek Wiki. Available at: http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php.
12. GraphViz Graph Visualization Software. Available at: http://www.graphviz. org/.
13. O. Kempthorne A simple approach to confounding and fractional replication in factorial experiments Biometrika 34 1947 255 272
14. E.H. Barnes Response bias and the MMPI J Consult Psychol 20 1956 371 374
15. P. Wallin Volunteer subjects as a source of sampling bias Am J Sociol 54 1949 539 544
16. P.G. Shinkman, and C.L. Kornblith Comment on observer bias in classical conditioning of the planarian Psychol Rep 16 1965 56
17. R.B. Zajonc, and E. Burnstein Structural balance, reciprocity, and positivity as sources of cognitive bias J Pers 33 1965 570 583
18. J.D. Snyder Race bias in hospitals. What the Civil Rights Commission found Hosp Manage 96 1963 52 54
19. A. Binder The Rorschach test: a perceptual bias Percept Mot Skills 18 1964 225 226
20. D. Blackwell, and J.L. Hodges Design for the control of selection bias Ann Math Statistics 28 1957 449 460
21. M. Callon, J. Courtial, and F. Laville Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research the case of polymer chemistry Scientometrics 22 1991 155 205
22. H. Qin Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis Library Trends 48 1999 133 159
23. P. Vineis History of bias Soz Prev Med 47 2002 156 161