Supervised learning events in the Foundation Programme: A UK-wide narrative interview study

BMJ Open

Volumn 4, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Rees, Charlotte E ^a   Cleland, Jennifer A ^b   Dennis, Ashley ^a   Kelly, Narcie ^c   Mattick, Karen ^c   Monrouxe, Lynn V ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; EMOTION; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATOR; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SUPERVISED LEARNING EVENT; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; NURSING EDUCATION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATION, NURSING; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FACULTY, NURSING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; NARRATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908149343     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005980     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. The UK Foundation Programme Curriculum, July 2012. http://www.foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/pages/foundation-doctors/training-and-assessment/fpcurriculum2012 (accessed Jun 2014).
2. Collins JP. Foundation for Excellence: An Evaluation of the Foundation Programme. Medical Education England; 2010. http://hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/321/2012/08/Foundation-for-excellence-report.pdf (accessed Jun 2014).
3. Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ 2010;341:c5064.
4. Tunstall P. Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: a typology. Br Educ Res J 1996;22:389-95.
5. Driessen E, Scheele F. What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research. Med Teach 2003;35:569-74.
6. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No 31. Med Teach 2007;9:855-71.
7. Nair BR, Alexander HG, McGrath BP, et al. The mini clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) for assessing clinical performance of international medical graduates. Med J Aust 2008;189:159-61.
8. Weller JM, Jones A, Merry AF, et al. Investigation of trainee and specialist reactions to the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia: implications for implementation. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:524-30.
9. van der Vleuten C. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1996;1:41-67.
10. Pereira EA, Dean BJ. British surgeons' experiences of mandatory online workplace-based assessment. J Royal Soc Med 2009;102:287-93.
11. Ryland I, Brown J, O'Brien M, et al. The portfolio: how was it for you? Views of F2 doctors from the Mersey Deanery Foundation Pilot. Clin Med 2006;6:378-80.
12. Weston PSJ, Smith CA. The use of mini-CEX in UK foundation training six years following its introduction: Lessons still to be learned and the benefit of formal teaching regarding its utility. Med Teach 2014;36:155-63.
13. Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wrag A, et al. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008;42:364-73.
14. Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA 2009;302:1316-26.
15. Pelgrim EAM, Kramer AWM, Mokkink HGA, et al. In-training assessment using direct observation of single-patient encounters: a literature review. Adv Health Sci Educ 2010;16:131-42.
16. Fernando N, Cleland JA, McKenzie H, et al. Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to Undergraduate Medical Students following formative mini-CEX assessments. Med Educ 2008;42:89-95.
17. Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, et al. Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Int Med 2004;19(5 Pt 2):558-56.
18. Yeates P, O'Neill P, Mann K, et al. Seeing the same thing differently: Mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments. Adv Health Sci Educ 2013;18:325-41.
19. Sinclair H, Cleland JA. Medical undergraduate students - who seeks formative feedback? Med Educ 2007;41:580-2.
20. Mattick K, Kelly N, Rees C. A window into the lives of junior doctors: narrative interviews exploring antimicrobial prescribing experiences. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2274-83.
21. Crotty M. The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage Publications, 2003.
22. Smith B, Sparkes AC. Contrasting perspectives on narrative selves and identities: an invitation to dialogue. Qual Res 2008;8:5-35.
23. Adler PA, Adler P. In: Baker SE, Edwards R, eds. How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. Review Paper. Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods, 2012. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how-many-interviews.pdf (accessed Sep 2014).
24. Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. "It's just a clash of cultures": emotional talk within medical students' narratives of professionalism dilemmas. Adv Health Sci Educ 2012;17:671-701.
25. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994:173-94.
26. Alvesson M, Karreman D. Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Hum Relat 2000;53:1125-49.
27. Riessman CK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.
28. Côté L, Turgeon J. Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Med Teach 2005;27:71-5.
29. Labov W, Waletzky J. Narrative analysis. Oral versions of personal experience. In: Helm J, ed. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, WA: American Ethnological Society, University of Washington Press, 1967:12-44.
30. Rees CE, Cleland J, Mattick K, et al. Supervised learning events qualitative evaluation project. Final Report to the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges; May 2013.
31. Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. "Is it alright if I-um-we unbutton your pyjama top now?" Pronominal use in bedside teaching encounters. Commun Med 2008;5:171-82.
32. Rees CE, Knight LV, Wilkinson CE. "Doctors being up there and we being down here": a metaphorical analysis of talk about student/doctor-patient relationships. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:725-37.
33. Rees CE, Knight LV, Cleland JA. Medical educators' metaphoric talk about their assessment relationship with students: "You don't want to sort of be the one who sticks the knife in them". Assess Eval Higher Educ 2009;34:455-67.
34. Wilkinson CE, Rees CE, Knight LV. "From the heart of my bottom": Negotiating humour in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res 2007;17:411-22.
35. Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Laughter for coping: Medical students narrating professionalism dilemmas. In: Figley C, Huggard P, Rees, CE, eds. First do no self-harm: understanding and promoting physician stress resilience. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013:67-87.
36. Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen E, et al. Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2009;43:874-82.
37. Cleland JA, Knight L, Rees C, et al. "Is it me or is it them?" Factors influencing assessors' failure to report underperformance in medical students. Med Educ 2008;42:800-9.
38. Chikwe J, de Souza AC, Pepper JR. No time to train surgeons. Brit Med J 2004;328:418-19.
39. Urqhuart LM, Rees CE, Ker JS. Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi-school study of medical students' narratives. Med Educ 2014;48:189-203.
40. Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA 2009;302:1330-1.
41. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, et al. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 2006;28:117-28.
42. Watling C, Lingard L. Toward meaningful evaluation of medical trainees: the influence of participants' perceptions of the process. Adv Health Sci Educ 2012;17:183-94.
43. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CPM, et al. Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Med Educ 2012;46:192-200.
44. Maxwell J. Using numbers in qualitative research. Qual Inq 2010;16:475-82.
45. Rees CE, Monrouxe LV, McDonald LA. Narrative, emotion and action: Analysing 'most memorable' professionalism dilemmas. Med Educ 2013;47:80-96.
46. Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess Eval High Educ 2013;38:698-712.