A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1499-1511

  Phan, Kevin ^a   Xie, Ashleigh ^a   Di Eusanio, Marco ^a,b   Yan, Tristan D ^a,c  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOLOGIC DISEASE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; KIDNEY FAILURE; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; PACEMAKER; PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION; PERICARDIAL EFFUSION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMONIA; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REOPERATION; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; REVIEW; STERNOTOMY; STERNUM; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WOUND INFECTION; AGED; AORTA VALVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; STERNOTOMY;

EID: 84908116834     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. D.M. Cosgrove 3rd, and J.F. Sabik Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations Ann Thorac Surg 62 1996 596 597
2. L.H. Cohn, D.H. Adams, and G.S. Couper Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair Ann Surg 226 1997 421 426 discussion 427-8
3. A. Korach, R.J. Shemin, C.T. Hunter, Y. Bao, and O.M. Shapira Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 51 2010 417 421
4. W.T. Brinkman, W. Hoffman, and T.M. Dewey Aortic valve replacement surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and PORT ACCESS groups Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 131 135
5. S. Dogan, O. Dzemali, and G. Wimmer-Greinecker Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial Ann Thorac Surg 12 2005 76 80
6. A. Aris, M.L. Camara, J. Montiel, L.J. Delgado, J. Galan, and H. Litvan Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study Ann Thorac Surg 67 1999 1583 1587 discussion 1587-8
7. H.E. Machler, P. Bergmann, and M. Anelli-Monti Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients Ann Thorac Surg 67 1999 1001 1005
8. M. Bonacchi, E. Prifti, G. Giunti, G. Frati, and G. Sani Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study Ann Thorac Surg 73 2002 460 465
9. M.A. Moustafa, A.A. Abdelsamad, G. Zakaria, and M.M. Omarah Minimal vs median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 15 2007 472 475
10. Ahangar AG, Charag AH, Wani ML, et al. Comparing aortic valve replacement through right anterolateral thoracotomy with median sternotomy. Int Cardiovasc Res J 7:90-4.
11. J. Calderon, P. Richebe, and J.P. Guibaud Prospective randomized study of early pulmonary evaluation of patients scheduled for aortic valve surgery performed by ministernotomy or total median sternotomy J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23 2009 795 801
12. M.L. Brown, S.H. McKellar, T.M. Sundt, and H.V. Schaff Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 670-9 e675
13. J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 2003 557 560
14. H. Balshem, M. Helfand, and H.J. Schunemann GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 401 406
15. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, and J. Tetzlaff The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration J Clin Epidemiol 62 2009 e1 e34
16. R. Sharony, E.A. Grossi, and P.C. Saunders Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement J Heart Valve Dis 13 2004 887 893
17. M. Tabata, S.F. Aranki, J.A. Fox, G.S. Couper, L.H. Cohn, and P.S. Shekar Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in left ventricular dysfunction Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 15 2007 225 228
18. E. Ruttmann, T.S. Gilhofer, and H. Ulmer Propensity score-matched analysis of aortic valve replacement by mini-thoracotomy J Heart Valve Dis 19 2010 606 614
19. J.H. Bang, J.W. Kim, and J.W. Lee Minimally invasive approaches versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matching study Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 45 2012 80 84
20. D.R. Johnston, F.A. Atik, and J. Rajeswaran Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144 2012 852-8 e853
21. M. Murzi, A.G. Cerillo, S. Bevilacqua, D. Gilmanov, P. Farneti, and M. Glauber Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41 2012 1242 1246
22. D. Gilmanov, S. Bevilacqua, and M. Murzi Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 837 843
23. M. Glauber, A. Miceli, and D. Gilmanov Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145 2013 1222 1226
24. B. Bridgewater, R.S. Steyn, S. Ray, and T. Hooper Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a transverse sternotomy: a word of caution Heart 79 1998 605 607
25. B.L. Frazier, M.J. Derrick, S.S. Purewal, L.R. Sowka, and S. Johna Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14 1998 S122 S125
26. J.G. Byrne, S.F. Aranki, G.S. Couper, D.H. Adams, E.N. Allred, and L.H. Cohn Reoperative aortic valve replacement: partial upper hemisternotomy versus conventional full sternotomy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118 1999 991 997
27. Y.S. Chang, P.J. Lin, C.H. Chang, J.J. Chu, and P.P. Tan "I" ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 68 1999 40 45
28. S. Christiansen, J. Stypmann, and T.D. Tjan Minimally-invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement - perioperative course and mid-term results Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 1999 647 652
29. J.S. Liu, A. Sidiropoulos, and W. Konertz Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 1999 S80 S83
30. M.F. Szwerc, D.H. Benckart, and R.J. Wiechmann Partial versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 68 1999 2209 2213
31. T. Walther, V. Falk, and S. Metz Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery Ann Thorac Surg 67 1999 1643 1647
32. W. Ehrlich, W. Skwara, W. Klovekorn, M. Roth, and E.P. Bauer Do patients want minimally invasive aortic valve replacement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17 2000 714 717
33. J.W. Lee, S.K. Lee, S.J. Choo, H. Song, and M.G. Song Routine minimally invasive aortic valve procedures Cardiovasc Surg 8 2000 484 490
34. C. Detter, T. Deuse, D.H. Boehm, H. Reichenspurner, and B. Reichart Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50 2002 337 341
35. N. Doll, M.A. Borger, and J. Hain Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization Ann Thorac Surg 74 2002 S1318 S1322
36. P. Masiello, E. Coscioni, A. Panza, F. Triumbari, G. Preziosi, and G. Di Benedetto Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy Cardiovasc Surg 10 2002 333 338
37. C. de Vaumas, I. Philip, and G. Daccache Comparison of minithoracotomy and conventional sternotomy approaches for valve surgery J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 17 2003 325 328
38. P. Corbi, M. Rahmati, and E. Donal Prospective comparison of minimally invasive and standard techniques for aortic valve replacement: initial experience in the first hundred patients J Card Surg 18 2003 133 139
39. F. Farhat, Z.Q. Lu, M. Lefevre, P. Montagna, P. Mikaeloff, and O. Jegaden Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement J Card Surg 18 2003 396 401
40. S.C. Stamou, E.I. Kapetanakis, R. Lowery, K.A. Jablonski, T.L. Frankel, and P.J. Corso Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-adjusted analysis Ann Thorac Surg 76 2003 1101 1106
41. J.M. De Smet, B. Rondelet, J.L. Jansens, M. Antoine, D. De Canniere, and J.L. Le Clerc Assessment based on EuroSCORE of ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 12 2004 53 57
42. T. Mihaljevic, L.H. Cohn, D. Unic, S.F. Aranki, G.S. Couper, and J.G. Byrne One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results Ann Surg 240 2004 529 534
43. E. Suenaga, H. Suda, and Y. Katayama Comparison of limited and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52 2004 286 291
44. A.L. Tyszka, R. Watanabe, and M.M. Cabral Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a comparison of results with the traditional technique Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 19 2004 34 41
45. H. Vanoverbeke, Y. Van Belleghem, K. Francois, F. Caes, T. Bové, and G. Van Nooten Operative outcome of minimal access aortic valve replacement versus standard procedure Acta Chir Belg 104 2004 440 444
46. G.H. Wheatley 3rd, S.L. Prince, M.A. Herbert, and W.H. Ryan Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution Heart Surg Forum 7 2004 E628 E631
47. I. Bakir, F.P. Casselman, and F. Wellens Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients Ann Thorac Surg 81 2006 1599 1604
48. B.G. Leshnower, C.S. Trace, and R.S. Boova Port-access-assisted aortic valve replacement: a comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques Heart Surg Forum 9 2006 E560 E564 discussion E564
49. S. Foghsgaard, T.A. Schmidt, and H.K. Kjaergard Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time Tex Heart Inst J 36 2009 293 297
50. A. Hiraoka, M. Kuinose, G. Chikazawa, T. Totsugawa, K. Katayama, and H. Yoshitaka Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery - comparison of port-access and conventional standard approach Circ J 75 2011 1656 1660
51. J.A. Fortunato Júnior, A.G. Fernandes, and J.R. Sesca Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: an alternative to the conventional technique Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 27 2012 570 582
52. T. Klokocovnik, T.K. Levart, and M. Bunc Double venous drainage through the superior vena cava in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a retrospective study Croat Med J 53 2012 11 16
53. F. Sansone, G. Punta, and F. Parisi Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for the aortic valve replacement: preliminary results Heart Lung Circ 21 2012 169 173
54. E. Mikus, S. Calvi, A. Tripodi, M. Lamarra, and M. Del Giglio Upper 'J' ministernotomy versus full sternotomy: an easier approach for aortic valve reoperation J Heart Valve Dis 22 2013 295 300
55. F.A. Paredes, S.J. Canovas, and O. Gil Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. A safe and useful technique beyond the cosmetic benefits Rev Esp Cardiol 66 2013 695 699
56. A.M. Pineda, O. Santana, J. Reyna, A. Sarria, G.A. Lamas, and J. Lamelas Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy J Heart Valve Dis 22 2013 50 55
57. A. Miceli, M. Murzi, and D. Gilmanov Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using right minithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.060 [Epub ahead of print]
58. J.S. Gammie, Y. Zhao, E.D. Peterson, S.M. O'Brien, J.S. Rankin, and B.P. Griffith J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 1401-8, 1410 e1401; discussion 1408-10
59. G.J. Murphy, B.C. Reeves, C.A. Rogers, S.I. Rizvi, L. Culliford, and G.D. Angelini Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery Circulation 116 2007 2544 2552
60. T. Walther, V. Falk, and F.W. Mohr Minimally invasive surgery for valve disease Curr Probl Cardiol 31 2006 399 437
61. L.G. Svensson, and R.S. D'Agostino Minimal-access aortic and valvular operations, including the "J/j" incision Ann Thorac Surg 66 1998 431 435