Double venous drainage through the superior vena cava in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: A retrospective study

Croatian Medical Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 11-16

  Klokočovnik, Tomislav ^a   Levart, Tanja Kersnik ^a   Bunc, Matjaž ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CANNULATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE VEIN DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM APPENDAGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SLOVENIA; STERNOTOMY; SUPERIOR CAVA VEIN; THORACOTOMY; THORAX DRAINAGE; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THORACOTOMY; VENA CAVA, SUPERIOR;

EID: 84857824100     PISSN: 03539504     EISSN: 13328166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.11     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:596-7.
2. Gundry SR, Shattuck OH, Razzouk AJ. at al. Facile minimally invasive cardiac surgery via mini-sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1100-4.
3. von Segesser LK, Westaby S, Pomar J, Loisance D, Groscurth P, Turina M. Less invasive aortic valve surgery: rationale and technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:781-5.
4. Minale C, Reifschneider HJ, Schmitz E, Uckmann FP. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without sternotomy. Experience with the first 50 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14 suppl 1:S126-9.
5. Mokadam NA, Melford RE Jr, Maynard C, Goss JR, Stewart D, Reisman M. Prevalence and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease. J Card Surg. 2006-2011;26:1-8.
6. Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Reichart B. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;50:337-41.
7. Christiansen S, Stypmann J, Tjan TD, Wichter T, Van Aken H, Scheld HH, et al. Minimally-invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement-perioperative course and mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:647-52.
8. G rossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, Buttenheim PM, Esposito R, Baumann FG, et al. Minimally invasive port access surgery reduces operative morbidity for valve replacement in the elderly. Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2:212-5.
9. Bouchot O, Stevens LM, Marenchino R, Cartier R. Alternative to sternotomy: aortic valve replacement through right thoracotomy. Heart Surg Forum. 2006;9:E595-7.
10. Klokocovnik T. Aortic and mitral valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach. Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;25:166-9.
11. Klokocovnik T. Minimally invasive parasternal approach to tricuspid valve avoids repeat sternotomy. Tex Heart Inst J. 2000;27:55-6.
12. S vensson LG, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Kim KH, Pettersson GB, et al. Does right thoracotomy increase the risk of mitral valve reoperation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:677-82.
13. Brinster DR, Byrne M, Rogers CD, Baim DS, Simon DI, Couper GS, et al. Effectiveness of same day percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and moderate coronary disease ("hybrid approach"). Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1501-3.