Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Brown, Morgan L ^a   McKellar, Stephen H ^a   Sundt, Thoralf M ^a   Schaff, Hartzell V ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BONE INFECTION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; MINISTERNOTOMY; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STERNOTOMY; STROKE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 60949096825     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Walther T., Falk V., and Mohr F.W. Minimally invasive surgery for valve disease. Curr Probl Cardiol 31 (2006) 399-437
2. Cohn L.H., Adams D.H., Couper G.S., Bichell D.P., Rosborough D.M., Sears S.P., et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 226 (1997) 421-428
3. Aris A, Camara ML, Montiel J, Delgado LJ, Galan J, Litvan H. Ministernotomy versus median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 999;67:1583-7.
4. Bakir I., Casselman F.P., Wellens F., Jeanmart H., De Geest R., Degrieck I., et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 1599-1604
5. Bonacchi M., Prifti E., Giunti G., Frati G., and Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 460-465
6. Byrne J.G., Aranki S.F., Couper G.S., Adams D.H., Allred E.N., and Cohn L.H. Reoperative aortic valve replacement: partial upper hemisternotomy versus conventional full sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118 (1999) 991-997
7. Candaele S., Herijgers P., Demeyere R., Flameng W., and Evers G. Chest pain after partial upper versus complete sternotomy for aortic valve surgery. Acta Cardiol 58 (2003) 17-21
8. Chang Y.S., Lin P.J., Chang C.H., Chu J.J., and Tan P.P. "I" ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 68 (1999) 40-45
9. Christiansen S., Stypmann J., Tjan T.D., Wichter T., Van Aken H., Scheld H.H., et al. Minimally-invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement-perioperative course and mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 (1999) 647-652
10. Corbi P., Rahmati M., Donal E., Lanquetot H., Jayle C., Menu P., et al. Prospective comparison of minimally invasive and standard techniques for aortic valve replacement: initial experience in the first hundred patients. J Card Surg 18 (2003) 133-139
11. De Smet J.M., Rondelet B., Jansens J.L., Antoine M., De Canniere D., and Le Clerc J.L. Assessment based on EuroSCORE of ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 12 (2004) 53-57
12. Detter C., Deuse T., Boehm D.H., Reichenspurner H., and Reichart B. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50 (2002) 337-341
13. Dogan S., Dzemali O., Wimmer-Greinecker G., Derra P., Doss M., Khan M.F., et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis 12 (2003) 76-80
14. Doll N., Borger M.A., Hain J., Bucerius J., Walther T., Gummert J.F., et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization. Ann Thorac Surg 74 (2002) S1318-S1322
15. Ehrlich W., Skwara W., Klovekorn W., Roth M., and Bauer E.P. Do patients want minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17 (2000) 714-717
16. Farhat F., Lu Z., Lefevre M., Montagna P., Mikaeloff P., and Jegaden O. Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 18 (2003) 396-401
17. Imazeki T., and Irie Y. [Aortic valve replacement through a partial sternotomy. Japanese]. Kyobu Geka 59 (2006) 650-655
18. Lee J.W., Lee S.K., Choo S.J., Song H., and Song M.G. Routine minimally invasive aortic valve procedures. Cardiovasc Surg 8 (2000) 484-490
19. Leshnower B.G., Trace C.S., and Boova R.S. Port-access-assisted aortic valve replacement: a comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques. Heart Surg Forum 9 (2006) E560-E564
20. Liu J., Sidiropoulos A., and Konertz W. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 Suppl. 2 (1999) S80-S83
21. Mächler H.E., Bergmann P., Anelli-Monti M., Dacar D., Rehak P., Knez I., et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 67 (1999) 1001-1005
22. Masiello P., Coscioni E., Panza A., Triumbari F., Preziosi G., and Di Benedetto G. Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy. Cardiovasc Surg 10 (2002) 333-338
23. Mihaljevic T., Cohn L.H., Unic D., Aranki S.F., Couper G.S., and Byrne J.G. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg 240 (2004) 529-534
24. Stamou S.C., Kapetanakis E.I., Lowery R., Jablonski K.A., Frankel T.L., and Corso P.J. Allogeneic blood transfusion requirements after minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a risk-adjusted analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 76 (2003) 1101-1106
25. Suenaga E., Suda H., Katayama Y., et al. Comparison of limited and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 52 (2004) 286-291
26. Szwerc M.F., Benckart D.H., Wiechmann R.J., Savage E.B., Szydlowski G.W., Magovern Jr. G.J., et al. Partial versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 68 (1999) 2209-2213
27. Vanoverbeke H., Van Belleghem Y., Francois K., Caes F., Bove T., and Van Nooten G. Operative outcome of minimal access aortic valve replacement versus standard procedure. Acta Chir Belg 104 (2004) 440-444
28. Walther T., Falk V., Metz S., Diegeler A., Battellini R., Autschbach R., et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 67 (1999) 1643-1647
29. Bridgewater B., Steyn R.S., Ray S., and Hooper T. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a transverse sternotomy: a word of caution. Heart 79 (1998) 605-607
30. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conversation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris V.A., Ferraris S.P., Saha S.P., Hessel II E.A., Haan C.K., et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg 83 5 Suppl (2007) S27-S86
31. Ali I.M., El-shanafi S., Kinley E.C., and Clark V. Subtotal median sternotomy for heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17 (2000) 255-259
32. Tabata M., Umakanthan R., Khalpey Z., Aranki S.F., Couper G.S., Cohn L.H., et al. Conversion to full sternotomy during minimal-access cardiac surgery: reasons and results during a 9.5-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134 (2007) 165-169
33. Caffarelli A.D., and Robbins R.C. Will minimally invasive replacement ever really be important?. Curr Opin Cardiol 19 (2005) 123-127
34. Chitwood Jr. W.R. Current status of endoscopic and robotic mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 79 (2005) S2248-S2253