Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Late conversion to full sternotomy doubles operative time

Texas Heart Institute Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 293-297

  Foghsgaard, Signe ^b   Schmidt, Thomas Andersen ^b   Kjaergard, Henrik K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Aortic valve surgery; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Heart valve diseases surgery; Heart valve prosthesis implantation methods; Intraoperative period; Postoperative complications; Sternum surgery; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

CARDIOPLEGIC AGENT; HTK SOLUTION;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA BALLOON; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLADDER CANCER; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; BRAIN INFARCTION; CARDIAC PATIENT; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART PERFUSION; HEART PROTECTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERICARDIAL EFFUSION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; SCORING SYSTEM; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMIC MYCOSIS; WOUND INFECTION;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; DENMARK; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STERNUM; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 69749120305     PISSN: 07302347     EISSN: 15266702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cooley DA. Antagonist's view of minimally invasive heart valve surgery. J Card Surg 2000;15(1):3-5. (Pubitemid 32436500)
2. Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Reichart B. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;50(6):337-341 (Pubitemid 35477415)
3. Masiello P, Coscioni E, Panza A, Triumbari F, Preziosi G, Di Benedetto G. Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10(4):333-338 (Pubitemid 35299932)
4. Sharony R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, Schwartz CF, Ribakove GH, Baumann FG, et al. Propensity score analysis of a sixyear experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13(6):887-893
5. Estrera AL, Reardon MJ. Current approaches to minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15(2):91-95 (Pubitemid 30142737)
6. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg 2004;240(3):529-534 (Pubitemid 39121347)
7. Hearn CJ, Kraenzler EJ, Wallace LK, Starr NJ, Sabik JF, Cosgrove DM. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: anesthetic considerations. Anesth Analg 1996;83(6):1342-1344 (Pubitemid 26418831)
8. Benjamini Y, Braun H. John W. Tukey's contributions to multiple comparisons. Ann Statist 2002;30(6):1576-1594
9. Vanoverbeke H, Van Belleghem Y, Francois K, Caes F, Bove T, Van Nooten G. Operative outcome of minimal access aortic valve replacement versus standard procedure. Acta Chir Belg 2004;104(4):440-444 (Pubitemid 39277711)
10. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81(5):1599-1604 (Pubitemid 350030018)
11. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73(2):460-466 (Pubitemid 34117390)
12. Candaele S, Herijgers P, Demeyere R, Flameng W, Evers G. Chest pain after partial upper versus complete sternotomy for aortic valve surgery. Acta Cardiol 2003;58(1):17-21. (Pubitemid 36433066)
13. Farhat F, Lu Z, Lefevre M, Montagna P, Mikaeloff P, Jegaden O. Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and mini sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2003;18(5):396-403. (Pubitemid 37176810)
14. Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacif ico AD. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86(6):845-857 (Pubitemid 14209268)
15. Ammar R, Porat E, Eisenberg DS, Uretzky G. Utility of spiral CT in minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14 Suppl 1:S130-3. (Pubitemid 28480270)