Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: Comparison of Outcomes in Matched Sternotomy and PORT ACCESS Groups

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 131-135

  Brinkman, William T ^a,b   Hoffman, William ^c,d   Dewey, Todd M ^a,b   Culica, Dan ^b   Prince, Syma L ^b   Herbert, Morley A ^a   Mack, Michael J ^a,b   Ryan, William H ^b,c,d  

^a MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute   (United States)

^c The Heart Hospital   (United States)

^d PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL OF DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; HEART PERFUSION; HEART TAMPONADE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PORT ACCESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VENTILATOR; WOUND INFECTION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STERNUM; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953567574     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.055     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Shiono M., Sezai Y., Sezai A., Hata M., Iida M., and Negishi N. Long-term results of the cloth-covered Starr-Edwards ball valve. Ann Thorac Surg 80 (2005) 204-209
2. Liu J., Sidiropoulos A., and Konertz W. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 suppl 2 (1999) S80-S83
3. Mächler H.E., Bergmann P., Anelli-Monti M., et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 67 (1999) 1001-1005
4. Dogan S., Dzemali O., Wimmer-Greinecker G., et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis 12 (2003) 76-80
5. Detter C., Deuse T., Boehm D.H., Reichenspurner H., and Reichart B. Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50 (2002) 337-341
6. Kaur S., Balaguer J., and Vander Salm T.J. Improved myocardial protection in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery with the assistance of port-access technology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116 (1998) 874-875
7. Kort S., Applebaum R.M., Grossi E.A., et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: echocardiographic and clinical results. Am Heart J 142 (2001) 476-481
8. Tabata M., Aranki S.F., Fox J.A., Couper G.S., Cohn L.H., and Shekar P.S. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in left ventricular dysfunction. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 15 (2007) 225-228
9. Tabata M., Umakanthan R., Cohn L.H., et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33 (2008) 537-541
10. Minale C., Reifschneider H.J., Schmitz E., and Uckmann F.P. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without sternotomy. Experience with the first 50 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14 suppl 1 (1998) S126-S129
11. Wheatley III G.H., Prince S.L., Herbert M.A., and Ryan W.H. Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution. Heart Surg Forum 7 (2004) E628-E631
12. Gregoric I.D., Tamez D., Karabulut M.N., et al. Aortic valve implantation in the calf: a successful approach using Heartport cannulation and minimally invasive techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 10 (2001) 675-680
13. Mihaljevic T., Cohn L.H., Unic D., Aranki S.F., Couper G.S., and Byrne J.G. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg 240 (2004) 529-534
14. Bonacchi M., Prifti E., Giunti G., Frati G., and Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation?. A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 460-465
15. Candaele S., Herijgers P., Demeyere R., Flameng W., and Evers G. Chest pain after partial upper versus complete sternotomy for aortic valve surgery. Acta Cardiol 58 (2003) 17-21
16. Bakir I., Casselman F.P., Wellens F., et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006) 1599-1604
17. Christiansen S., Stypmann J., Tjan T.D., et al. Minimally-invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement-perioperative course and mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 (1999) 647-652