Port-access-assisted aortic valve replacement: A comparison of minimally invasive and conventional techniques

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 85-89

  Leshnower, Bradley G ^a   Trace, Candace S ^b   Boova, Robert S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTIC VALVE REPAIR; ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; OBESITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33751525673     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20051111     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akpinar B, Guden M, Sagbas E, et al. 2003. Combined radiofrequency modified maze and mitral valve procedure through a port access approach: early and mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:223-30.
2. Aris A. 1999. Reversed "C" ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1806-7.
3. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Le Bret E, et al. 1996. Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success [in French]. C R Acad Sci III 319:219-23.
4. Chitwood WR Jr. 2001. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: what is "port access"? Am Heart J 142:391-2.
5. Christiansen S, Stypmann J, Tjan TD, et al. 1999. Minimally-invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement - perioperative course and mid-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:647-52.
6. Citterio E, Manasse E, Pilato E, et al. 2001. Port-access cardiac surgery: clinical experience with first 50 cases. Ital Heart J 2:904-9.
7. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. 1997. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 9:331-6.
8. Cosgrove DM, Sabik JF. 1996. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 62:596-7.
9. Fann JI, Pompili MF, Stevens JH, et al. 1997. Port-access cardiac operations with cardioplegic arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 63:S35-9.
10. Galloway AC, Shemin RJ, Glower DD, et al. 1999. First report of the Port Access International Registry. Ann Thorac Surg 67:51-6; discussion 57-8.
11. Gillinov AM, Banbury MK, Cosgrove DM. 2000. Hemisternotomy approach for aortic and mitral valve surgery. J Card Surg 15:15-20.
12. Glower DD, Landolfo KP, Clements F, et al. 1998. Mitral valve operation via port access versus median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14(Suppl 1):S143-7.
13. Glower DD, Siegel LC, Frischmeyer KJ, et al. 2000. Predictors of outcome in a multicenter port-access valve registry. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1054-9.
14. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, et al. 2001. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 71:807-10.
15. Kaur S, Balaguer J, Vander Salm TJ. 1998. Improved myocardial protection in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery with the assistance of port-access technology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116:874-5.
16. Kort S, Applebaum RM, Grossi EA, et al. 2001. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: echocardiographic and clinical results. Am Heart J 142:476-81.
17. Machler HE, Bergmann P, Anelli-Monti M, et al. 1999. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: a prospective study in 120 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 67:1001-5.
18. McCreath BJ, Swaminathan M, Booth JV, et al. 2003. Mitral valve surgery and acute renal injury: port access versus median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 75:812-9.
19. Onnasch JF, Schneider F, Falk V, et al. 2002. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: a true benefit for the patient. J Card Surg 17:14-9.
20. Pompili MF, Stevens JH, Burdon TA, et al. 1996. Port-access mitral valve replacement in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1268-74.
21. Schroeyers P, Farhat F, Van Praet F, et al. 2000. Video-assisted port-access combined mitral valve and CABG surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 9:783-5.
22. Stevens JH, Burdon TA, Peters WS, et al. 1996. Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: a proposed surgical method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:567-73.
23. Svensson LG. 1997. Minimal-access "J" or "j" sternotomy for valvular, aortic, and coronary operations or reoperations. Ann Thorac Surg 64:1501-3.
24. Tripp HF, Glower DD, Lowe JE, et al. 2002. Comparison of port access to sternotomy in tricuspid or mitral/tricuspid operations. Heart Surg Forum 5:136-40.
25. Wheatley GH, Prince SL, Herbert MA, et al. 2004. Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution. Heart Surg Forum 7:E628-31.