Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: A 10-year experience

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 417-421

  Korach, A ^a   Shemin, R J ^b   Hunter, C T ^b   Bao, Y ^c   Shapira, O M ^a  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic valve; Blood transfusion; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GENDER; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AORTA VALVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ODDS RATIO; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955384931     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF. A minimally invasive approach to aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:596-97.
2. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministemotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:460-65.
3. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens T, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I et al. Minimally versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1599-604.
4. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results. Ann Surg 2004;240:529-34.
5. Shapira OM, O'Gara P, Roy-Cutter S, Lazar HL, Shemin RJ. Heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements in proximal aortic surgery. J Card Surg 2000;154:229-38.
6. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. (Internet). Available from: http://www.ctsnet.org/file/241 DataSpecs.pdf. [cited 2007; Jun 10].
7. Nair RU, Sharpe DA. Minimally invasive reversed Z sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1165-6.
8. Cuenca J, Rodriguez-Delgadillo MA, Valle JV, Campos V, Herrera JM, Rodriguez F et al. Is the femoral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14(Suppl 1):S111-4.
9. Hendrickson SC, Glower DD. A method of perfusion of the leg during cardiopulmonary bypass via femoral cannulation. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1807-8.
10. Sharoni R, Grossi EA, Saunders PC, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery in the elderly: a case-control study. Circulation 2003;108(Suppl 1):II43-7.
11. Farhat F, Lu Z, Lefevre M, Montagna P, Mikaeloff P, Jegaden O. Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement. J Card Surg 2003;18:396-01.
12. Massiello P, Coscini E, Panza A, Triumbari F, Preziosi G, Di Benedetto G. Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy. Cardiovasc Surg 2002;10:333-8.