Xist repression shows time-dependent effects on the reprogramming of female somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells

Stem Cells

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2642-2656

  Chen, Qi ^a,b   Gao, Shuai ^b   He, Wenteng ^b,c   Kou, Xiaochen ^b,c   Zhao, Yanhong ^b,c   Wang, Hong ^c   Gao, Shaorong ^b,c  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

^c TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

H3K27me3; iPSC; MacroH2A; Pre iPSC; X chromosome reactivation; Xist

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; CELL MEMBRANE PROTEIN; HISTONE H2A; ISOPROPYL THIOGALACTOSIDE; POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2; SHORT HAIRPIN RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; X INACTIVE SPECIFIC TRANSCRIPT 1 PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; LONG UNTRANSLATED RNA; XIST NON-CODING RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FEMALE; GENE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INDUCTION; GENE REPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; HISTONE MODIFICATION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SOMATIC CELL; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION; XIST GENE; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; TIME;

ANIMALS; ASCORBIC ACID; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FEMALE; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MALE; MICE; RNA, LONG NONCODING; TIME FACTORS; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 84908098607     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: 15494918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1775     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Penny GD, Kay GF, Sheardown SA et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 1996;379:131-137.
2. Marahrens Y, Panning B, Dausman J et al. Xist-deficient mice are defective in dosage compensation but not spermatogenesis. Genes Dev 1997;11:156-166.
3. Hernandez-Munoz I, Lund AH, van der Stoop P et al. Stable X chromosome inactivation involves the PRC1 polycomb complex and requires histone MACROH2A1 and the CULLIN3/SPOP ubiquitin E3 ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:7635-7640.
4. Schoeftner S, Sengupta AK, Kubicek S et al. Recruitment of PRC1 function at the initiation of X inactivation independent of PRC2 and silencing. EMBO J 2006;25:3110-3122.
5. Wutz A, Jaenisch R. A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. Mol Cell 2000; 5:695-705.
6. Minkovsky A, Patel S, Plath K. Concise review: Pluripotency and the transcriptional inactivation of the female mammalian X chromosome. Stem Cells 2012;30:48-54.
7. Avner P, Heard E. X-chromosome inactivation: Counting, choice and initiation. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:59-67.
8. Pullirsch D, Hartel R, Kishimoto H et al. The Trithorax group protein Ash2l and Saf-A are recruited to the inactive X chromosome at the onset of stable X inactivation. Development 2010;137:935-943.
9. Csankovszki G, Nagy A, Jaenisch R. Synergism of Xist RNA, DNA methylation, and histone hypoacetylation in maintaining X chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol 2001; 153:773-784.
10. Diaz-Perez SV, Ferguson DO, Wang C et al. A deletion at the mouse Xist gene exposes trans-effects that alter the heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome and the replication time and DNA stability of both X chromosomes. Genetics 2006;174: 1115-1133.
11. Boumil RM, Lee JT. Forty years of decoding the silence in X-chromosome inactivation. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:2225-2232.
12. Zhang LF, Huynh KD, Lee JT. Perinucleolar targeting of the inactive X during S phase: Evidence for a role in the maintenance of silencing. Cell 2007;129:693-706.
13. Csankovszki G, Panning B, Bates B et al. Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation. Nat Genet 1999;22:323-324.
14. Costanzi C, Stein P, Worrad DM et al. Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female preimplantation mouse embryos. Development 2000; 127:2283-2289.
15. Chadwick BP, Willard HF. Cell cycledependent localization of macroH2A in chromatin of the inactive X chromosome. J Cell Biol 2002;157:1113-1123.
16. Pasque V, Gillich A, Garrett N et al. Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming. EMBO J 2011;30: 2373-2387.
17. Pasque V, Halley-Stott RP, Gillich A et al. Epigenetic stability of repressed states involving the histone variant macroH2A revealed by nuclear transfer to Xenopus oocytes. Nucleus 2011;2:533-539.
18. Gao Y, Chen J, Li K et al. Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2013;12:453-469.
19. Costa Y, Ding J, Theunissen TW et al. NANOG-dependent function of TET1 and TET2 in establishment of pluripotency. Nature 2013;495:370-374.
20. Bagci H, Fisher AG. DNA demethylation in pluripotency and reprogramming: The role of tet proteins and cell division. Cell Stem Cell 2013;13:265-269.
21. Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K et al. X-Chromosome inactivation in cloned mouse embryos. Science 2000;290:1578-1581.
22. Bao S, Miyoshi N, Okamoto I et al. Initiation of epigenetic reprogramming of the X chromosome in somatic nuclei transplanted to a mouse oocyte. EMBO Rep 2005;6:748-754.
23. Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H et al. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 2001;293:95-97.
24. Nolen LD, Gao S, Han Z et al. X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos. Dev Biol 2005;279:525-540.
25. Mak W, Nesterova TB, de Napoles M et al. Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 2004; 303:666-669.
26. Okamoto I, Otte AP, Allis CD et al. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 2004;303:644-649.
27. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:55-70.
28. Kim DH, Jeon Y, Anguera MC et al. Xchromosome epigenetic reprogramming in pluripotent stem cells via noncoding genes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011;22:336-342.
29. Plath K, Mlynarczyk-Evans S, Nusinow DA et al. Xist RNA and the mechanism of X chromosome inactivation. Ann Rev Genet 2002;36:233-278.
30. Plath K, Lowry WE. Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:253-265.
31. Ohhata T, Wutz A. Reactivation of the inactive X chromosome in development and reprogramming. Cell Mol Life Sci 2013;70: 2443-2461.
32. Han DW, Greber B, Wu G et al. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into epiblast stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2011;13:66-71.
33. Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault DT et al. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:230-240.
34. Mansour AA, Gafni O, Weinberger L et al. The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming. Nature 2012;488:409-413.
35. Pasque V, Radzisheuskaya A, Gillich A et al. Histone variant macroH2A marks embryonic differentiation in vivo and acts as an epigenetic barrier to induced pluripotency. J Cell Sci 2012;125:6094-6104.
36. Boiani M, Eckardt S, Scholer HR et al. Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: Consequences for pluripotency. Genes Dev 2002;16:1209-1219.
37. Kang L, Wang J, Zhang Y et al. iPS cells can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos. Cell Stem Cell 2009;5:135-138.
38. Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:151-159.
39. Jiao J, Dang Y, Yang Y et al. Promoting reprogramming by FGF2 reveals that the extracellular matrix is a barrier for reprogramming fibroblasts to pluripotency. Stem Cells 2013;31:729-740.
40. Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Golipour A, David L et al. Functional genomics reveals a BMPdriven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:64-77.
41. Li R, Liang J, Ni S et al. A mesenchymalto- epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:51-63.
42. Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007;448:196-199.
43. Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007;448: 191-195.
44. Dejosez M, Zwaka TP. Pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Ann Rev Biochem 2012;81:737-765.
45. Silva J, Barrandon O, Nichols J et al. Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e253.
46. Gurdon JB. From nuclear transfer to nuclear reprogramming: The reversal of cell differentiation. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006;22:1-22.