Promoting reprogramming by FGF2 reveals that the extracellular matrix is a barrier for reprogramming fibroblasts to pluripotency

Stem Cells

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 729-740

  Jiao, Jiao ^a,b   Dang, Yujiao ^a   Yang, Yuanyuan ^a,c   Gao, Rui ^a   Zhang, Yu ^a   Kou, Zhaohui ^a   Sun, Xiao Fang ^c   Gao, Shaorong ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c GUANGZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Extracellular matrix; Fibroblast growth factor 2; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Reprogramming

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELLS, CULTURED; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; FIBROBLASTS; MICE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 84875774142     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1318     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663-676.
2. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007;448:313-317.
3. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007;448: 318-324.
4. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:55-70.
5. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007;131:861-872.
6. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 2008;451:141-146.
7. Kang L, Wang J, Zhang Y et al. iPS cells can support full-term development of tetraploid blastocyst-complemented embryos. Cell Stem Cell 2009;5:135-138.
8. Boland MJ, Hazen JL, Nazor KL et al. Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2009;461:91-94.
9. Zhao XY, Li W, Lv Z et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 2009;461:86-90.
10. Yoshida Y, Takahashi K, Okita K et al. Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009;5: 237-241.
11. Esteban MA, Wang T, Qin B et al. Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010;6:71-79.
12. Hong H, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T et al. Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway. Nature 2009;460: 1132-1135.
13. Kawamura T, Suzuki J, Wang YV et al. Linking the p53 tumour suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprogramming. Nature 2009;460: 1140-1144.
14. Li H, Collado M, Villasante A et al. The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming. Nature 2009;460:1136-1139.
15. Marion RM, Strati K, Li H et al. A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity. Nature 2009;460:1149-1153.
16. Utikal J, Polo JM, Stadtfeld M et al. Immortalization eliminates a roadblock during cellular reprogramming into iPS cells. Nature 2009; 460:1145-1148.
17. Niwa H, Ogawa K, Shimosato D et al. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 2009;460:118-122.
18. Greber B, Wu G, Bernemann C et al. Conserved and divergent roles of FGF signaling in mouse epiblast stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010;6:215-226.
19. Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I et al. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell selfrenewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 2003;115:281-292.
20. Li Z, Fei T, Zhang J et al. BMP4 signaling acts via dual-specificity phosphatase 9 to control ERK activity in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012;10:171-182.
21. Dvorak P, Dvorakova D, Koskova S et al. Expression and potential role of fibroblast growth factor 2 and its receptors in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2005;23:1200-1211.
22. Eiselleova L, Matulka K, Kriz V et al. A complex role for FGF-2 in self-renewal, survival, and adhesion of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2009;27:1847-1857.
23. Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007;448:191-195.
24. Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007;448:196-199.
25. Han DW, Greber B, Wu G et al. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into epiblast stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2011;13:66-71.
26. Chen J, Liu J, Han Q et al. Towards an optimized culture medium for the generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. J Biol Chem 2010;285:31066-31072.
27. Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG et al. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:151-159.
28. Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault DT et al. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2008;2:230-240.
29. Boiani M, Eckardt S, Scholer HR et al. Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: Consequences for pluripotency. Genes Dev 2002;16:1209-1219.
30. Kang L, Wu T, Tao Y et al. Viable mice produced from three-factor induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells through tetraploid complementation. Cell Res 2011;21:546-549.
31. Riboni L, Viani P, Bassi R et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor-induced proliferation of primary astrocytes. Evidence for the involvement of sphingomyelin biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 2001;276:12797-12804.
32. Brodsky B, Baum J. Structural biology: Modelling collagen diseases. Nature 2008;453:998-999.
33. Yamada KM. Cell surface interactions with extracellular materials. Annu Rev Biochem 1983;52:761-799.
34. Hanna J, Saha K, Pando B et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 2009;462:595-601.
35. Li R, Liang J, Ni S et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:51-63.
36. Samavarchi-Tehrani P, Golipour A, David L et al. Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2010;7:64-77.
37. Shafa M, Day B, Yamashita A et al. Derivation of iPSCs in stirred suspension bioreactors. Nat Methods 2012;9:465-466.
38. Fluri DA, Tonge PD, Song H et al. Derivation, expansion and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells in continuous suspension cultures. Nat Methods 2012;9:509-516.