Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into epiblast stem cells

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 66-71

  Han, Dong Wook ^a   Greber, Boris ^a   Wu, Guangming ^a   Tapia, Natalia ^a   Araúzo Bravo, Marcos J ^a   Ko, Kinarm ^b,c   Bernemann, Christof ^a   Stehling, Martin ^a   Schöler, Hans R ^a,d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR BIOMEDICINE   (Germany)

^b Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; MYC PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL FATE; CELL STRUCTURE; CHIMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EPIGENETICS; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MOUSE; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FEMALE; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GERM LAYERS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; KRUPPEL-LIKE TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; MALE; MICE; MICE, SCID; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-MYC; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SOXB1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TERATOMA; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 78650515020     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2136     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brons, I. G. et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191-195 (2007).
2. Tesar, P. J. et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196-199 (2007).
3. Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55-70 (2007).
4. Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313-317 (2007).
5. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006).
6. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318-324 (2007). (Pubitemid 47080337)
7. Evans, M. J. & Kaufman, M. H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154-156 (1981).
8. Gardner, R. L. & Rossant, J. Investigation of the fate of 4-5 day post-coitum mouse inner cell mass cells by blastocyst injection. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 52, 141-152 (1979).
9. Nakagawa, M. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 101-106 (2008).
10. Nichols, J. & Smith, A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487-492 (2009).
11. Rossant, J. Stem cells and early lineage development. Cell 132, 527-531 (2008).
12. Guo, G. et al. Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 136, 1063-1069 (2009).
13. Sridharan, R. et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364-377 (2009).
14. Greber, B. et al. Conserved and divergent roles of FGF signaling in mouse epiblast stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 215-226 (2010).
15. Xu, C. et al. Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 971-974 (2001).
16. Yeom, Y. I. et al. Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Development 122, 881-894 (1996).
17. Bao, S. et al. Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Nature 461, 1292-1295 (2009).
18. Chou, Y. F. et al. The growth factor environment defines distinct pluripotent ground states in novel blastocyst-derived stem cells. Cell 135, 449-461 (2008).
19. Johansson, B. M. & Wiles, M. V. Evidence for involvement of activin A and bone mor-phogenetic protein 4 in mammalian mesoderm and hematopoietic development. Mol Cell Biol 15, 141-151 (1995).
20. Yao, S. et al. Long-term self-renewal and directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in chemically defined conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6907-6912 (2006).
21. Hadjantonakis, A. K., Gertsenstein, M., Ikawa, M., Okabe, M. & Nagy, A. Non-invasive sex-ing of preimplantation stage mammalian embryos. Nat. Genet. 19, 220-222 (1998).
22. Han, D. W. et al. Epiblast stem cell subpopulations represent mouse embryos of distinct pregastrulation stages. Cell 143, 617-627 (2010).
23. Silva, J. et al. Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722-737 (2009).
24. Hayashi, K., Lopes, S. M., Tang, F. & Surani, M. A. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell 3, 391-401 (2008).
25. Hanna, J. et al. Metastable pluripotent states in NOD-mouse-derived ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 4, 513-524 (2009).
26. Hall, J. et al. Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Kruppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 5, 597-609 (2009).
27. Vierbuchen, T. et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463, 1035-1041 (2010).
28. Han, D. W. et al. Pluripotential reprogramming of the somatic genome in hybrid cells occurs with the first cell cycle. Stem Cells 26, 445-454 (2008).