A Retrospective Evaluation of the Perfecting Patient Care University Training Program for Health Care Organizations

American Journal of Medical Quality

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 30-38

  Morganti, Kristy Gonzalez ^a   Lovejoy, Susan ^a   Beckjord, Ellen Burke ^a,b   Haviland, Amelia M ^a,c   Haas, Ann C ^a   Farley, Donna O ^a  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

evaluation; outcomes; quality improvement; success; training

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MORALITY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE MORAL JUDGMENT;

EID: 84907969565     PISSN: 10628606     EISSN: 1555824X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1062860613483354     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
2. Oliver N Delbridge R Barton H. Lean production and manufacturing performance improvement in Japan, the UK and US, 1994-2001. Cambridge, England: ESRC Centre for Business Research; 2002.
3. Dentz J Nahmens I Mullens M. Applying lean production in factory homebuilding. Cityscape. 2009; 11(1):81-104.
4. Ferdousi F Ahmed A. How becoming lean can improve performance: a study on Bangladeshi garment industry. Production Inventory Manag J. 2010; 3(9):36-42.
5. Dumitrescu C Dumitrache M. The impact of lean Six Sigma on the overall results of companies. Economia: Seria Manage. 2011; 14: 535-544.
6. Zimina D Glenn B Pasquire C. Target value design: using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Construct Manag Econ. 2012; 30: 383-398.
7. Johnson JE Smith AL Mastro KA. From Toyota to the bedside: nurses can lead the lean way in health care reform. Nurs Adm Q. 2012; 36: 234-242.
8. McIntosh B Cookson G. Lean management in the NHS: fad or panacea. Br J Health Care Manage. 2012; 18: 130-135.
9. Auerbach AD Landefeld CS Shojania KG. The tension between needing to improve care and knowing how to do it. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 608-613.
10. Mittman BS. Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 897-901.
11. Solberg LI Kottke TE Brekke ML, et al. Failure of a continuous quality improvement intervention to increase the delivery of preventive services. A randomized trial. Eff Clin Pract. 2000; 3: 105-115.
12. Blumenthal D Kilo CM, et al. A report card on continuous quality improvement. Milbank Q. 1998; 76: 625-648.
13. Hall LW Headrick LA Cox KR Deane K Gay JW Brandt J. Linking health professional learners and health care workers on action-based improvement teams. Qual Manag Health Care. 2009; 18: 194-201.
14. Kaplan HC Brady PW Dritz MC, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2010; 88: 500-559.
15. Landon BE Wilson IB McInnes K, et al. Effects of a quality improvement collaborative on the outcome of care of patients with HIV infection: the EQHIV study. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 887-896.
16. Taylor SL Dy S Foy R, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20: 611-617.
17. Boonyasai RT Windish DM Chakraborti C Feldman LS Rubin HR Bass EB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007; 298: 1023-1037.
18. Henley E. A quality improvement curriculum for medical students. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002; 28: 42-48.
19. Canal DF Torbeck L Djuricich AM. Practice-based learning and improvement: a curriculum in continuous quality improvement for surgery residents. Arch Surg. 2007; 142: 479-482.
20. Djuricich AM Ciccarelli M Swigonski NL. A continuous quality improvement curriculum for residents: addressing core competency, improving systems. Acad Med. 2004; 79(10 suppl):S65-S67.
21. François P Vinck D Labarère J Reverdy T Peyrin JC. Assessment of an intervention to train teaching hospital care providers in quality management. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14: 234-239.
22. Kyrkjebø JM. Teaching quality improvement in the classroom and clinic: getting it wrong and getting it right. J Nurs Educ. 2006; 45: 109-116.
23. Kyrkjebø JM Hanssen TA Haugland B. Introducing quality improvement to pre-qualification nursing students: evaluation of an experiential programme. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10: 204-210.
24. Varkey P Reller MK Smith A Ponto J Osborn M. An experiential interdisciplinary quality improvement education initiative. Am J Med Qual. 2006; 21: 317-322.
25. Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative. PPC University. https://www.prhi.org/perfecting-patient-care/ppc-university. Accessed November 12, 2012.
26. Grunden N. The Pittsburgh Way to Efficient Healthcare: Improving Patient Care Using Toyota Based Methods. New York, NY: Productivity Press; 2008.
27. Farley DO Damberg CL Ridgely S, et al. Assessment of the National Patient Safety Initiative: Final Report, Evaluation Report IV. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2008.
28. Kirkpatrick DL. (1976) Evaluation. In: CraigRL, ed. Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (pp. 294-312). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29. Salas E Burke CS Bowers CA Wilson KA. Team training in the skies: does crew resource management (CRM) training work? Hum Factors. 2001; 43: 641-674.
30. Wile N. (2009). Kirkpatrick four level evaluation model. In HoffmanB, ed. Encyclopedia of educational technology. Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://eet.sdsu.edu/eetwiki/index.php/Kirkpatrick_four_level_evaluation_model. San Diego, CA: SDSU Department of Educational Technology.
31. Feldstein AC Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 34: 228-243.