Academic achievements post school entry as related to motivation, precursor competencies, and relationship qualities;Die herausbildung erster leistungsprofile nach schuleintritt: Zusammenhänge zu motivation, vorläuferkompetenzen und beziehungsqualitäten

Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 267-280

  Harwardt Heinecke, Elena ^a   Milatz, Anne ^a   Ahnert, Lieselotte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Conflict tendency; Gender differences; Motivation; Precursor competence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907925167     PISSN: 0342183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2378/peu2014.art21d     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ahnert, L. &Harwardt, E. (2008). Die Beziehungserfahrungen der Vorschulzeit und ihre Bedeutung für den Schuleintritt. Empirische Pädagogik, 22, 145 - 159.
2. Ahnert, L., Harwardt-Heinecke, E., Kappler G., Eckstein-Madry, T. &Milatz, A. (2012). Student-teacher relationships and classroom climate in first grade: How do they relate to students' stress regulation? Attachment &Human Development, 14, 249 - 263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.673277
3. Ahnert, L., Milatz, A., Kappler, G., Schneiderwind, J. &Fischer, R. (2013). The impact of teacher-child relationships on child cognitive performance as explored by a priming paradigm. Developmental Psychology, 49, 554 - 567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031283
4. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M. K. &Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade two. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 699 - 713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699
5. Baker, L. &Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452 - 477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
6. Becker, M., McElvany, N. &Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 773 - 785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
7. Birch, S. H. &Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children's interpersonal behaviors and the teacher-child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934 - 946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.934
8. Bryk, A. S. &Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Bus, A. G. &van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 403 - 414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.403
10. Butler, R. (1999). Information seeking and achievement motivation in middle childhood and adolescence: The role of conceptions of ability. Developmental Psychology, 35, 146 - 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.146
11. Carr, M., Steiner, H., Kyser, B. &Biddlecomb, B. (2008). A comparison of predictors of early emerging gender differences in mathematics competency. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 61 - 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.04.005
12. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, ... Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology,43, 1428 - 1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
13. Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Willows, D., Schuster, B., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z. &Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250 - 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
14. Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M. &Schmitt, M. (2010). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden Lehrbuch; mit Online-Materialien. Weinheim: Beltz.
15. Else-Quest, N., Hyde, J. &Linn, M. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103 - 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018053
16. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. &Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272 - 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
17. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S. &Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3 - 13.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
18. Hamre, B. K. &Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's outcomes through eigth grade. Child Development, 72, 625 - 638.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
19. Hannover, B. &Kessels, U. (2011). Sind Jungen die neuen Bildungsverlierer? Empirische Evidenz für Geschlechterdisparitäten zuungunsten von Jungen und Erklärungsansätze. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 89 - 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000039
20. Harwardt, E., Krause, S. &Kloss, A.-K. (2006). Ratings on students' motivation to achieve. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
21. Hasselhorn, M. (2005). Lernen im Altersbereich zwischen 4 und 8 Jahren: Individuelle Voraussetzungen, Entwicklung, Diagnostik und Förderung. In T. Guldimann &B. Hauser (Hrsg.), Bildung 4- bis 8-jähriger Kinder (S. 77-88). Münster: Waxmann.
22. Hasselhorn, M. &Grube, D. (2008). Individuelle Voraussetzungen und Entwicklungsbesonderheiten des Lernens im Vorschul- und frühen Schulalter. Empirische Pädagogik, 22, 113 - 126.
23. Hu, L. &Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1 - 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24. Hughes, J. &Kwok, O. M. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers' engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 39 - 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.39
25. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E. &Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139 - 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
26. Jansen, H., Mannhaupt, G., Marx, H. &Skowronek, H. (2002). Bielefelder Screening zur Früherkennung von Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
27. Kautter, H., Storz, L. &Munz, W. (2000). SBL I. Schultestbatterie zur Erfassung des Lernstandes in Mathematik, Lesen und Schreiben I. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH.
28. Kesner, J. E. (2000). Teacher characteristics and the quality of child-teacher relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 133 - 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00043-6
29. Klieme, E., Artelt, C., Hartig, J., Jude, N., Köller, O., Prenzel, M., ... Stanat, P. (2010). PISA 2009 - Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt. Münster: Waxmann.
30. Krajewski, K. (2003). Vorhersage von Rechenschwäche in der Grundschule. Hamburg: Kovac.
31. Krajewski, K. &Schneider, W. (2006). Mathematische Vorlüuferfertigkeiten im Vorschulalter und ihre Vorhersagekraft für die Mathematikleistungen bis zum Ende der Grundschulzeit. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 53, 246 - 262.
32. Krajewski, K., Schneider, W. &Nieding, G. (2008). Zur Bedeutung von Arbeitsgedächtnis, Intelligenz, phonologischer Bewusstheit und früher Zahlen-Mengen-Kompetenz beim Übergang vom Kindergarten in die Grundschule. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 55, 100 - 113.
33. Kraus, J. (1998). Spaßpädagogik. Sackgassen deutscher Schulpolitik. München: Universitas.
34. Küspert, P. &Schneider, W. (2008). Hören, lauschen, lernen - Sprachspiele für Vorschulkinder (6. Aufl.). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &Ruprecht.
35. Lachance, J. A. &Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2006). A longitudinal analysis of sex differences in math and spatial skills in primary school age children. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 195 - 216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.12.001
36. Lepola, J., Salonen, P. &Vauras, M. (2000). The development of motivational orientations as a function of divergent reading careers from pre-school to the second grade. Learning and Instruction, 10, 153 - 177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00024-9
37. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H. &Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184 - 196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
38. Lynch, M. &Cicchetti, D. (1997). Children's relationships with adults and peers: An examination of elementary and junior high school students. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 81 - 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00031-3
39. Lynn, R. &Mikk, J. (2009). Sex differences in reading achievement. TRAMES, 13, 3 - 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.1.01
40. McElvany, N., Kortenbruck, M. &Becker, M. (2008). Lesekompetenz und Lesemotivation. Entwicklung und Mediation des Zusammenhangs durch Leseverhalten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22, 207 - 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.207
41. Middleton, J. A. &Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65 - 88. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/749630
42. Milatz, A., Glüer, M., Harwardt-Heinecke, E., Kappler, G. &Ahnert, L. (2014). The student-teacher relationship scale revisited: Testing factorial structure, measurement invariance and validity criteria in German speaking samples. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 357 - 368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.003
43. Möller, K. (2002). Anspruchsvolles Lernen in der Grundschule - Am Beispiel naturwissenschaftlich-technischer Inhalte. Pädagogische Rundschau, 56, 411 - 435.
44. Morgan, P. L. &Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165 - 183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300203
45. Murray, C., Waas, G. A. &Murray, K. M. (2008). Child race and gender as moderators of the association between teacher-child relationships and school adjustment. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 562 - 578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20324
46. Niklas, F. &Schneider, W. (2012). Die Anfänge geschlechtsspezifischer Leistungsunterschiede in mathematischen und schriftsprachlichen Kompetenzen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44, 123 - 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/ a000064
47. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19, 139 - 158. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/10573560308222
48. Palermo, F., Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A. &Reiser, M. (2007). Preschoolers' academic readiness: What role does the teacher-child relationship play? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 407 - 422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.04.002
49. Pianta, R. C. (1997). Adult-child relationship processes and early schooling. Early Education and Development, 8, 11 - 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0801-2
50. Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10314-000
51. Pianta, R. C. (2001). STRS. Student-teacher relationship scale. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
52. Pianta, R. C. &Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 57, 61 - 80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219925706
53. Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S. &Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 295 - 312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519
54. Pianta, R. C. &Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children's success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33, 444 - 458.
55. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer Software, Version 2.14.0]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
56. Robinson, J. P. &Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 268 - 302. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372249
57. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1 - 36.
58. Schneider, W. (1994). Geschlechtsunterschiede beim Schriftspracherwerb: Befunde aus den Münchner Längsschnittstudien LOGIK und SCHOLASTIK. In S. Richter &H. Brügelmann (Hrsg.), Mädchen lernen anders lernen Jungen. Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede beim Schriftspracherwerb (S. 71 - 82). Bottinghofen am Bodensee: Libelle.
59. Schneider, W. &Berger, N. (2012). Why phonological awareness is causally important in the acquisition of reading and spelling. In S. Suggate &E. Reese (Eds.), Contemporary debates in early childhood (pp. 216 - 226). London: Routledge.
60. Stipek, D. &Miles, S. (2008). Effects of aggression on achievement: Does conflict with the teacher make it worse? Child Development, 79, 1721 - 1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01221.x
61. Van Luit, J. E. H., van de Rijt, B. A. M. &Hasemann, K. (2001). Osnabrücker Test zur Zahlenbegriffsentwicklung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
62. Weinert, F. E. &Helmke, A. (1997). Entwicklung im Grundschulalter. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
63. Weinert, F. E. &Schneider, W. (Eds.). (1999). Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich longitudinal study. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.