Erratum: Subsidiary Initiatives in the Institutional Environment [Manag Int Rev, DOI 10.1007/s11575-013-0191-2];Subsidiary Initiatives in the Institutional Environment

Management International Review

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 757-778

  Hamprecht, Julia ^a   Schwarzkopf, Jan ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Climate change; Institutional duality; Institutional theory; Subsidiaries

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907860637     PISSN: 09388249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0203-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Ambos, T., Andersson, U., & Birkinshaw, J. (2010). What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? Journal of International Business Studies,41(2), 1099–1118.
2. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 548–570.
3. Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: the importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science,14(1), 510–527.
4. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 717–736.
5. Birkinshaw, J. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal,18(3), 207–229.
6. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review,32(4), 946–967.
7. Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal,47(2), 747–760.
8. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies,32(1), 439–458.
9. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment,13(1), 209–222.
10. Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. The Academy of Management Review,18(3), 397–428.
11. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal,18(8), 407–423.
12. Forsgren, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (1999). Accounting for the strengths of MNC subsidiaries: the case of foreign-owned firms in Denmark. International Business Review,8(2), 181–196.
13. Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal,37(4), 350–382.
14. Greenpeace (2007). Car manufacturers put the brakes on climate law. http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/car-manufacturers-put-the-brakes-on-climate-law. Accessed on 13 December 2010.
15. Greenpeace (2009). Erleben, was stagniert! Hamburg, Germany: Greenpeace. http://www.greenpeace.de/fileadmin/gpd/user_upload/themen/verkehr/IAAFlugblatt_2009.pdf. Accessed on 14 December 2010.
16. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. The Academy of Management Journal,49(2), 27–48.
17. Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. (2005). The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies,36(4), 322–340.
18. Hoffmann, V. H., Trautmann, T., & Hamprecht, J. (2009). Regulatory uncertainty: a reason to postpone investments? Not necessarily. Journal of Management Studies,46(9), 1227–1253.
19. Howard-Grenville, J., & Hoffman, A. J. (2003). The importance of cultural framing to the success of social initiative in business. Academy of Management Executive,17(1), 70–84.
20. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies,37(6), 838–849.
21. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review,20(4), 1015–1152.
22. Kawulich, B, B. (2005) Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum on Qualitative Social Research, 6(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/466/997. Accessed on 18 May 2010.
23. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal,45(2), 215–233.
24. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of MNCs: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review,33(4), 994–1007.
25. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review,24(1), 64–81.
26. Levy, D. L., & Kolk, A. (2002). Strategic responses to global climate change: conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry. Business and Politics,4(3), 275–300.
27. Levy, D. L., & Rothenberg, S. (2002). Heterogeneity and change in environmental strategy: technological and political responses to climate change in the global automobile industry. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 173–193). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal,75(1), 1–23.
29. Manning, P. K. (1982). Analytic induction. In P. K. Manning & R. B. Smith (Eds.), A handbook of social science methods (pp. 273–302). Cambridge: Ballinger.
30. Mayring, P, (2002) Einführung in die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz.
31. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology,83(3), 340–363.
32. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review,16(1), 145–179.
33. Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research. Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
34. Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: how social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research In Organizational Behavior,22(2), 237–281.
35. Ratiu, C., & Molz, R. (2010). Multinationals and corporate environmental strategies: fostering subsidiary initiative. In R. Molz et al. (Eds.), The multinational enterprise in developing countries: local versus global logic (pp. 179–193). London: Routledge.
36. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal,22(3), 237–250.
37. Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Tihanyi, L. (2004). A model of the global and institutional antecedents of high-level corporate environmental performance. Business & Society,43(1), 6–36.
38. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal,41(4), 681–697.
39. Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal,26(1), 159–180.
40. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,19(6), 729–753.
41. Steenkamp, J.-B., & Geyskens, I. (2012). Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: a test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40(2), 252–270.
42. Tallman, S., & Chacar, A. S. (2011). Knowledge accumulation and dissemination in MNEs: a practice-based framework. Journal of Management Studies,48(2), 278–304.
43. UNFCCC (2010). Advance unedited version. Draft decision -/CP.16. Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term cooperative action under the convention. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf. Accessed on 7 March 2011.
44. Wan, W. P., & Hillman, A. J. (2006). One of these things is not like the others: what contributes to dissimilarity among MNE subsidiaries’ political strategy? Management International Review,46(1), 85–110.
45. Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: a stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics,86(2), 155–169.