Speed discrimination predicts word but not pseudo-word reading rate in adults and children

Brain and Language

Volumn 138, Issue , 2014, Pages 27-37

  Main, Keith L ^a,b,c   Pestilli, Franco ^a   Mezer, Aviv ^a   Yeatman, Jason ^a   Martin, Ryan ^d   Phipps, Stephanie ^a   Wandell, Brian ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Dorsal stream; Magnocellular pathway; Reading; Speed discrimination

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST DETECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; HUMAN; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; READING RATE; SPEED DISCRIMINATION; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL INFORMATION; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE; WORD RECOGNITION; AGE; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907835282     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Akutsu H., Legge G.E., Ross J.A., Schuebel K.J. Psychophysics of reading - X. Effects of age-related changes in vision. Journal of Gerontology 1991, 46:325-331.
2. Balota D.A., Chumbley J.I. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:340-357.
3. Benassi M., Simonelli L., Giovagnoli S., Bolzani R. Coherence motion perception in developmental dyslexia: A meta-analysis of behavioral studies. Dyslexia 2010, 16(4):341-357.
4. Ben-Yehudah G., Sackett E., Malchi-Ginzberg L., Ahissar M. Impaired temporal contrast sensitivity in dyslexics is specific to retain-and-compare paradigms. Brain 2001, 124:1381-1395.
5. Boden C., Giaschi D. M-stream deficits and reading-related visual processes in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133(2):346-366.
6. Boets B., Vandermosten M., Cornelissen P., Wouters J., Ghesquiere P. Coherent motion sensitivity and reading development in transition from prereading to reading stage. Child Development 2011, 82(3):854-869.
7. Boets B., Wouters J., van Wieringen A., Ghesquiere P. Coherent motion detection in preschool children at family risk for dyslexia. Vision Research 2006, 46:527-535.
8. Borsting E., Ridder W.H., Dudeck K., Kelley C., Matsui L., Motoyama J. The presence of a magnocellular defect depends on the type of dyslexia. Vision Research 1996, 36(7):1047-1053.
9. Bouma H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research 1973, 13:762-782.
10. Bouwhuis D., Bouma H. Visual word recognition of three letter words as derived from the recognition of the constituent letters. Perception and Psychophysics 1979, 25:12-22.
11. Braddick O.J., O'Brien J.M.D., Wattam-Bell J., Atkinson J., Hartley T., Turner R. Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion. Perception 2001, 30(1):61-72.
12. Braddick O.J., O'Brien J.M.D., Wattam-Bell J., Atkinson J., Turner R. Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain. Current Biology 2000, 10(12):731-734.
13. Braet W., Humphreys G.W. Case mixing and the right parietal cortex: Evidence from rTMS. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 168:265-271.
14. Broadbent D.E. Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review 1967, 74:1-15.
15. Brunn J.L., Farah M.J. The relation between spatial attention and reading: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:59-75.
16. Buchel C., Josephs O., Rees G., Turner R., Frith C., Friston K.J. The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. Brain 1998, 121:1281-1294.
17. Cattell J.M. The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind 1886, 11:63-65.
18. Chawla D., Phillips J., Buechel C., Edwards R., Friston K.J. Speed-dependent motion-sensitive responses in V5: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 1998, 7:86-96.
19. Chouake T., Levy T., Javitt D.C., Lavidor M. Magnocellular training improves visual word recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6(14):1-6.
20. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review 1993, 100:589-608.
21. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
22. Cornelissen P.L., Bradley L., Fowler S., Stein J. What children see affects how they spell. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1994, 34:296-304.
23. Cornelissen P.L., Hansen P.C. Motion detection, letter position encoding, and single word reading. Annals of Dyslexia 1998, 48:155-188.
24. Cornelissen P.L., Hansen P.C., Gilchrist I., Cormack F., Essex J., Frankish C. Coherent motion detection and letter position encoding. Vision Research 1998, 38(14):2181-2191.
25. Cornelissen P.L., Hansen P.C., Hutton J.L., Evangelinou V., Stein J.F. Magnocellular visual function and children's single word reading. Vision Research 1998, 38(3):471-482.
26. Cornelissen P.L., Richardson A., Mason A., Fowler S., Stein J. Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls. Vision Research 1995, 35(10):1483-1494.
27. Culham J., He S., Dukelow S., Verstraten F.A.J. Visual motion and the human brain: What has neuroimaging told us?. Acta Psychologica 2001, 107(1-3):69-94.
28. De Luca M., Spinelli D., Zoccolotti P. Eye movement patterns in reading as a function of visual field defects and contrast sensitivity loss. Cortex 1996, 32:491-502.
29. Dehaene S., Cohen L., Sigman M., Vinckier F. The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:335-341.
30. Déjerine J. Anatomie des centres nerveux 1895, Vol. 1. Rueff et Cie, Paris.
31. Demb J.B., Boynton G.M., Best M., Heeger D.J. Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia. Vision Research 1998, 38(11):1555-1559.
32. Demb J.B., Boynton G.M., Heeger D.J. Brain activity in visual cortex predicts individual differences in reading performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1997, 94(24):13363-13366.
33. Demb J.B., Boynton G.M., Heeger D.J. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18(17):6939-6951.
34. DeYoe E.A., Van Essen D.C. Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 1988, 11:219-226.
35. Eden G.F., VanMeter J.W., Rumsey J.M., Maisog J.M., Woods R.P., Zeffiro T.A. Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature 1996, 382(6586):66-69.
36. Edwards V.T., Giaschi D.E., Dougherty R.F., Edgell D., Bjornson B.H., Lyons C., et al. Psychophysical indexes of temporal processing abnormalities in children with developmental dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004, 25(3):321-354.
37. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1993, Chapman & Hall, New York.
38. Evans B.J.W., Drasdo N., Richards I.L. An investigation of some sensory and refractive visual factors in dyslexia. Vision Research 1994, 34(14):1913-1926.
39. Farmer M.E., Klein R.M. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1995, 2(4):460-493.
40. Felmingham K.L., Jakobson L.S. Visual and visuomotor performance in dyslexic children. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 106:467-474.
41. Field G.D., Sampath A.P., Rieke F. Retinal processing near absolute thresholds: From behavior to mechanism. Annual Review of Physiology 2005, 67:491-514.
42. Fischer B., Hartnegg K. Stability of gaze control in dyslexia. Strabismus 2000, 119-122.
43. Forster K.I., Chambers S.M. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1973, 12:627-635.
44. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15(1):20-25.
45. Grainger J., Grainer J.P., Farioli F., Van Assche E., van Heuven W. Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:865-884.
46. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
47. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe. Neuron 1998, 21:191-202.
48. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Hendler T., Malach R. The dynamics of object selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:837-843.
49. Gross-Glenn K., Skottun B.C., Glenn W., Kushch A., Lingua R., Dunbar M., et al. Contrast sensitivity in dyslexia. Visual Neuroscience 1995, 12(1):153-163.
50. Handler S.M., Fierson W.M. Joint technical report-learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics 2011, 127(3):E818-E856.
51. Hansen P.C., Stein J.F., Orde S.R., Winter J.L., Talcott J.B. Are dyslexics' visual deficits limited to measures of dorsal stream function?. NeuroReport 2001, 12(7):1527-1530.
52. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111(3):662-720.
53. Haug B.A., Baudewig J., Paulus W. Selective activation of human cortical area V5A by rotating a visual stimulus in fMRI: Implication of attentional mechanisms. NeuroReport 1998, 9:611-614.
54. Hayduk S., Bruck M., Cavanagh P. Low-level visual processing skills of adults and children with dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1996, 13(7):975-1015.
55. Hinton G.E., Shallice T. Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review 1991, 98:74-95.
56. Howard R.J., Brammer M., Wright I., Woodruff P.W., Bullmore E.T., Zeki S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Current Biology 1996, 6:1015-1019.
57. Howes D.H., Solomon R.L. Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1951, 41:401-410.
58. Humphreys G.W., Evett L.J., Quinlan P.T. Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology 1990, 22(4):517-560.
59. Johnston J.C., McClelland J.L. Visual factors in word perception. Perception and Psychophysics 1973, 14:365-370.
60. Kevan A., Pammer K. Making the link between dorsal stream sensitivity and reading. Neuroreport 2008, 19(4):467-470.
61. Konen C.S., Kastner S. Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:224-231.
62. Kriegeskorte N., Sorger B., Naumer M., Schwarzbach J., van den Boogert E., Hussy W., Goebel R. Human cortical object recognition from a visual motion flowfield. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:1451-1463.
63. Kronbichler M., Hutzler F., Wimmer H. Dyslexia: Verbal impairments in the absence of magnocellular impairments. Neuroreport 2002, 13(5):617-620.
64. Legge G., Pelli D.G., Rubin G.S., Schleske M.M. Psychophysics of reading I. Normal vision. Vision Research 1984, 25:239-252.
65. Lehmkuhle S., Garzia R.P., Turner L., Hash T., Baro J.A. A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine 1993, 328:989-996.
66. Lehmkuhle S. Neurological basis of visual processes in reading. Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities 1993, 77-94. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D.M. Willows, R. Kruk, E. Corcos (Eds.).
67. Leigh R.J., Zee D.S. The neurology of eye movements 1999, Oxford University Press, New York.
68. Lennerstrand G., Ygge J., Jacobson C. Control of binocular eye movements in normals and dyslexics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1993, 682:231-239.
69. Levy T., Walsh V., Lavidor M. Dorsal stream modulation of visual word recognition in skilled readers. Vision Research 2010, 50(9):883-888.
70. Liederman J., Fisher J., Schulz M., Maxwell C., Theoret H., Pascual-Leone A. The role of motion direction selective extrastriate areas in reading. Brain and Language 2003, 85:140-155.
71. Lovegrove W.J., Heddle M., Slaghuis W. Reading-disability - Spatial-frequency specific deficits in visual information store. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18(1):111-115.
72. Lovegrove W., Martin F., Bowling A., Blackwood M., Badcock D., Paxton S. Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading-disability. Neuropsychologia 1982, 20(3):309-315.
73. Martin F., Lovegrove W. The effects of field size and luminance on contrast sensitivity differences between specifically reading disabled and normal-children. Neuropsychologia 1984, 22(1):73-77.
74. Martin F., Lovegrove W. Flicker contrast sensitivity in normal and specifically disabled readers. Perception 1987, 16(2):215-221.
75. Mason M. From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographics regularity. Memory and Cognition 1978, 6(5):568-581.
76. Mason M. Reading-ability and the encoding of item and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1980, 6(1):89-98.
77. Mason A., Cornelissen P., Fowler S., Stein J. Contrast sensitivity, ocular dominance and specific reading-disability. Clinical Vision Sciences 1993, 8(4):345-353.
78. Maunsell J.H.R., Newsome W.T. Visual processing in monkey extra-striate cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1987, 10:363-401.
79. McCandliss B.D., Cohen L., Dehaene S. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(7):293-299.
80. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
81. Merigan W.H., Byrne C.E., Maunsell J.H.R. Does primate motion perception depend on the magnocellular pathway?. Journal of Neuroscience 1991, 11:3422-3429.
82. Merigan W.H., Katz L.M., Maunsell J.H.R. The effects of parvocellular lateral geniculate lesions on the acuity and contrast of macaque monkeys. The Journal of Neuroscience 1991, 11(4):994-1001.
83. Merigan W.H., Maunsell J.H.R. Macaque vision after magnocellular lateral geniculate lesions. Visual Neuroscience 1990, 5:347-352.
84. Merigan W.H., Nealey T.A., Maunsell J.H.R. Visual effects of lesions of cortical area V2 in macaques. Journal of Neuroscience 1993, 13(7):3180-3191.
85. Monsell S., Doyle M.C., Haggard P.N. Effects of word frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118(1):43-71.
86. Morrison R.E. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:667-682.
87. Newsome W.T., Pare E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). The Journal of Neuroscience 1988, 8:2201-2211.
88. Olulade O.A., Napoliello E.M., Eden G.F. Abnormal visual motion processing is not a cause of dyslexia. Neuron 2013, 79(1):180-190.
89. Owsley C. Aging and vision. Vision Research 2011, 51(13):1610-1622.
90. Pavlidis G.T. Do eye movements hold the key to dyslexia?. Neuropsychologia 1981, 19:57-64.
91. Peressotti F., Grainger J. Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception and Psychophysics 1995, 57(6):875-890.
92. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K.E. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
93. Poblano A., de Caballero B.C., Castillo I., Cortes V. Electro-oculographic recordings reveal reading deficiencies in learning disabled children. Archives of Medical Research 1996, 27:509-512.
94. Posner M.I., Walker J.A., Friedrich F.J., Rafal R.D. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. The Journal of Neuroscience 1984, 4:1863-1874.
95. Purpura K., Kaplan E., Shapley R.M. Background light and the contrast gain of primate P and M retinal ganglion cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1988, 85(12):4534-4537.
96. Ramus F., Ahissar M. Developmental dyslexia: The difficulties of interpreting poor performance, and the importance of normal performance. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2012, 29(1-2):104-122.
97. Ramus F., Rosen S., Dakin S.C., Day B.L., Castellote J.M., White S., et al. Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain 2003, 126:841-865.
98. Rayner K., Inhoff A.W., Morrison R.E., Slowiaczek M.L., Bertera J.H. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:167-179.
99. Rayner K., Well A.D., Pollatsek A., Betrtera J.H. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics 1982, 31:537-550.
100. Reicher G.M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81(2):275-280.
101. Ridder W.H., Borsting E., Banton T. All developmental dyslexic subtypes display an elevated motion coherence threshold. Optometry and Vision Science 2001, 78(7):510-517.
102. Riddoch J., Humphreys G., Cleton P., Fery P. Interaction of attentional and lexical processes in neglect dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990, 7:479-517.
103. Rubino C.A., Minden H.A. An analysis of eye-movements in children with a reading disability. Cortex 1990, 7:479-517.
104. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effects and some tests and enhancements of the model. Psychological Review 1982, 89:60-94.
105. Schiller P.H., Logothetis N.K., Charles E.H. Function of the colour-opponent and broad-band channels of the visual system. Nature 1990, 343(6253):68-70.
106. Schlaggar B.L., McCandliss B.D. Development of neural systems for reading. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:475-503.
107. Schulte-Körne G., Bartling J., Deimel W., Remschmidt H. Motion-onset VEPs in dyslexia. Evidence for visual perceptual deficit. Neuroreport 2004, 15(6):1075-1078.
108. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
109. Selfridge O.G. Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. Proceedings of the symposium on mechanisation of thought processes 1959, 511-529. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, England. D.V. Blake, A.M. Uttley (Eds.).
110. Shapley R. Visual sensitivity and parallel retinocortical channels. Annual Review of Psychology 1990, 41:635-658.
111. Shapley R., Perry V.H. Cat and monkey retinal ganglion-cells and their visual functional roles. Trends in Neurosciences 1986, 9(5):229-235.
112. Skottun B.C. On the conflicting support for the magnocellular-deficit theory of dyslexia - Response to Stein, Talcott and Walsh (2000). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4(6):211-212.
113. Slaghuis W.L., Ryan J.F. Spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity, coherent motion, and visible persistence in developmental dyslexia. Vision Research 1999, 39(3):651-668.
114. Solan H.A., Hansen P.C., Shelley-Tremblay J., Ficarra A. Coherent motion threshold measurements for M-cell deficit differ for above- and below-average readers. Optometry 2003, 74(11):727-734.
115. Solomon R.L., Postman L. Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952, 43:195-201.
116. Stein J. The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia 2001, 7:12-36.
117. Stein J.F., Fowler M.S. Unstable binocular control in dyslexic children. Journal of Research in Reading 1993, 16:30-45.
118. Stein J.F., Walsh V. To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences 1997, 20:147-151.
119. Szwed M., Ventura P., Querido L., Cohen L., Dehaene S. Reading acquisition enhances early visual processes of contour integration. Developmental Science 2012, 1:139-149.
120. Talcott J.B., Gram A., Van Ingelghem M., Witton C., Stein J.F., Toennessen F.E. Impaired sensitivity to dynamic stimuli in poor readers of a regular orthography. Brain and Language 2003, 87(2):259-266.
121. Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Assoku E.L., Stein J.F. Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: Evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(7):935-943.
122. Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Willis-Owen C., McKinnell I.W., Richardson A.J., Stein J.F. Visual magnocellular impairment in adult developmental dyslexics. Neuro-Ophthalmology 1998, 20(4):187-201.
123. Talcott J.B., Witton C., Hebb G.S., Stoodley C.J., Westwood E.A., France S.J., et al. On the relationship between dynamic visual and auditory processing and literacy skills; results from a large primary-school study. Dyslexia 2002, 8(4):204-225.
124. Talcott J.B., Witton C., McLean M.F., Hansen P.C., Rees A., Green G.G.R., et al. Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000, 97(6):2952-2957.
125. Tootell R.B.H., Reppas J.B., Kwong K.K., Malach R., Born R.T., Brady T.J., et al. Functional-analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15(4):3215-3230.
126. Torgesen J.K., Wagner R.K., Rashotte C.A., Rose E., Lindamood P., Conway T., et al. Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91(4):579-593.
127. Vaina L.M., Lemay M., Bienfang D.C., Choi A.Y., Nakayama K. Intact "biological motion" and "structure from motion" perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study. Visual Neuroscience 1990, 5:353-369.
128. Vidyasagar T.R., Pammer K. Dyslexia: A deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14(2):57-63.
129. Watson A.B., Pelli D.G. Quest - A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics 1983, 33(2):113-120.
130. Wechsler D. Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence 1999, The Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace & Company, New York.
131. Wheeler D.D. Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1970, 1(1):59-85.
132. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 221-243.
133. Whitney C., Cornelissen P. Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading 2005, 28:274-301.
134. Williams M.J., Stuart G.W., Castles A., McAnally K.I. Contrast sensitivity in subgroups of developmental dyslexia. Vision Research 2003, 43(4):467-477.
135. Wilmer J.B., Richardson A.J., Chen Y., Stein J.F. Two visual motion processing deficits in developmental dyslexia associated with different reading skills deficits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16(4):528-540.
136. Witton C., Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Richardson A.J., Griffiths T.D., Rees A., et al. Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Current Biology 1998, 8(14):791-797.
137. Yeatman J.D., Rauschecker A.M., Wandell B.A. Anatomy of the visual word form area: Adjacent cortical circuits and long-range white matter connections. Brain and Language 2013, 125:146-155.