The role of motion direction selective extrastriate regions in reading: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Brain and Language

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 140-155

  Liederman, Jacqueline ^a   Fisher, Janet McGraw ^a   Schulz, Marcela ^a   Maxwell, Carolyn ^a   Théoret, Hugo ^b   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; Phonological processing; Reading; TMS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; PHONETICS; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0037380062     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00550-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anstis S., Verstraten F., Mather G. The motion aftereffect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2:1998;111-117.
2. Beckers G., Zeki S. The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. Brain. 118:1995;49-60.
3. Borsting E., Ridder W.H., Dudeck K., Kelley C., Matsui L., Motoyama J. The presence of a magnocellular defect depends on the type of dyslexia. Vision Research. 36:1996;1047-1053.
4. Cornelissen P.L., Hansen P.C., Hutton J.L., Evangelinou V., Stein J.F. Magnocellular visual function and children's single word reading. Vision Research. 38:1998;471-482.
5. Coslett H.B., Monsul N. Reading with the right hemisphere: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain and Language. 46:1994;198-211. (doi:10.1006/brln.l994/1012).
6. Culham J.C., Dukelow S.P., Vilis T., Hassard F.A., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. Journal of Neurophysiology. 81:1999;388-393.
7. Demb J.B., Boynton G.M., Best M., Heeger D.J. Psychophysical evidence for a magnooellular pathway deficit in dyslexia. Vision Research. 38:1998;1555-1559.
8. Demb J.B., Boynton G.M., Heeger D.J. Brain activity in visual cortex predicts individual differences in reading performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 94:1997;13363-13366.
9. Demb J.B., Boynton G.M., Heeger D.J. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia. The Journal of Neuroscience. 18:1998;6939-6951.
10. Eden G.F., Van Meter J.M., Rumsey J., Maisog J.M., Woods R.P., Zeffiro T.A. Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature. 382:1996;66-69.
11. Gaillard W.D., Pugliese M., Grandin C.B., Braniecki S.H., Kondapaneni P., Hunter K., Xu B., Petrella J.R., Balsamo L., Basso G. Cortical localization of reading in normal children: An fMRI language study. Neurology. 57:2001;47-54.
12. Galaburda A.M., Menard M.T., Rosen G.D. Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 913:1994;9010-9013.
13. Goodale M. Visual pathways supporting perception and action in the primate cerebral cortex. Current Biology. 3:1993;578-585.
14. Hallet M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature. 406:2000;147-150.
15. Hautzel H., Taylor J.G., Krause B.J., Schmitz N., Tellmann L., Ziemons K., Shah N.J., Herzog H., Muller-Gartner H.W. The motion aftereffect: More than area V5/MT? Evidence from 15O-butanol PET studies. Brain Research. 892:2001;281-292.
16. Hilgetag C., Théoret H., Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 4:2001;953-957.
17. Horwitz B., Rumsey J., Donahue B. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 98:1998;8939-8944.
18. Hotson J., Braun D., Herzberg W., Boman D. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of extrastriate cortex degrades human motion direction discrimination. Vision Research. 34:1994;2115-2123.
19. Howard R.J., Brammer M., Wright I., Woodruff P.W., Bullmore E.T., Zeki S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Current Biology. 6:1996;1015-1019.
20. Joseph, J. E., Eden, G. F., Jones, K., & Zeffiro, T. A. (1999, November). Co-localization of visual motion and phonological processing in lateral extrastriate cortex. Poster session presented at the Society for Neurosciences Annual Meeting, Miami, FL.
21. Livingstone M.S., Rosen G.D., Drislane F.W., Galaburda A.M. Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 88:1991;7943-7947.
22. Moore C., Price C.J. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. NeuroImage. 10:1999;181-192. (doi:10.1006/nimg.l999.0450).
23. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropyschologia. 9:1971;97-113.
24. Olson R., Forsberg H., Wise B., Rack J. Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. Reid Lyon G. Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. 1994;243-277 Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, Baltimore.
25. Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V., Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: Virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 10:2000;232-237.
26. Pascual-Leone A., Bartres-Faz D., Keenan J.P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Studying brain-behavior relationship by induction of "virtual lesions" Trans Royal Philosophical Society. 354:1999;1229-1238.
27. Paulesu E., Démonet J.F., Fazio F., McCrory E., Chanoine V., Brunswick N., Cappa S.F., Cossu G., Habib M., Frith C.D., Frith U. Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science. 291:2001;2165-2167.
28. Pennington B.F. Genetics of learning disabilities. Journal of Child Neurology. 10:1995;S69-S77.
29. Pirozzolo F.J., Rayner K. Handedness, cerebral specialization and saccadic eye movement latencies. Neuropsychologia. 18:1980;225-229.
30. Rayner K. Foveal and parafoveal cues in reading. Requin J. Attention and performance VII. 1978;149-161 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
31. Ridder W.H., Borsting E., Cooper M., McNeel B., Huang E. Not all dyslexics are created equal. Optometry and Vision Science. 74:1997;99-104.
32. Rumsey J.M., Nace K., Donohue B., Wise D., Maisog J.M., Andreason P. A positron emission tomographic study of impaired word recognition and phonological processing in dyslexic men. Archives of Neurology. 54:1997;562-573.
33. Shaywitz S.E., Shaywitz B.A., Pugh K.R., Fulbright R.K., Constable R.T., Mencl W.E., Shankweiler D.P., Liberman A.M., Skudlarski P., Fletcher J.M., Katz L., Marchione K.E., Lacadie C., Gatenby C., Gore J.C. Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 95:1998;2636-2641.
34. Stein J.F. The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia. 7:2001;12-36.
35. Steinman B.A., Steinman S.B., Lehmkule S. Transient visual attention is dominated by the magnocellular stream. Vision Research. 37:1997;17-23.
36. Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Willis-Owen C., McKinnell I.W., Richardson A.J., Stein J. Visual magnocellular impairment in adult developmental dyslexics. Neuro-Opthalmology. 20:1998;187-201.
37. Théoret, H., Kobayashi, M., Ganis, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2001, November). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of Area MT/V5 disrupts storage of the motion aftereffect. Poster session presented at the Society for Neurosciences Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
38. Tootell R.B., Reppas J.B., Dale A.M., Look R.B., Sereno M.I., Malach R., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature. 375:1995;139-141.
39. Trussell L.O. Cellular mechanisms for preservation of timing in central auditory pathways. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 7:1997;487-492.
40. Walsh V., Rushworth M. A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia. 37:1999;125-135.
41. Wassermann B. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 108:1998;1-16.
42. Witton C., Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Richardson A.J., Griffiths T.D., Rees A., Stein J.F., Green G.G.R. Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Current Biology. 8:1998;791-797.