Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1797-1804

  Kim, Solip ^a   Choi, Seon Hyeong ^a   Choi, Yoonjung ^a   Kook, Shin Ho ^a   Park, Hee Jin ^a   Chung, Eun Chul ^a  

^a School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast ultrasound; Shear wave elastography; Sonography; Technique

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; MEDICAL IMAGING; SCANNING; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR WAVES; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

BREAST; BREAST ULTRASOUND; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; ORTHOGONAL DIRECTIONS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; TECHNIQUE;

ELASTICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84907757438     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: 15509613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.10.1797     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239:341-350.
2. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007; 245:401-410.
3. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:2381-2389.
4. Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Doré CJ, et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:1023-1032.
5. Mun HS, Choi SH, Kook SH, Choi Y, Jeong WK, Kim Y. Validation of intra-and interobserver reproducibility of shearwave elastography: phantom study. Ultrasonics 2013; 53:1039-1043.
6. Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 129:89-97.
7. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256:297-303.
8. Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Pattern classification of ShearWave™ elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses. Acta Radiol 2011; 52:1069-1075.
9. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012; 262: 435-449.
10. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12:R104.
11. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:1015-1026.
12. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:883-892.
13. Marusky A, Almendro V, Polyak K. Intra-tumoral heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 2012; 12:323-334.
14. Polyak K, Vogt PK. Progress in breast cancer research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:2715-2717.
15. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press; 2005.
16. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW. Using realtime tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29:551-563.
17. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008; 9:111-118.
18. Egorov V, Kearney T, Pollak SB, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 118:67-80.
19. Chung SY, Moon WK, Choi JW, Cho N, Jang M, Kim KG. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography. Acta Radiol 2010; 51:9-14.
20. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:224-229.
21. Zhi H, Xiao X-y, Ou B, et al. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification? Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:3216-3221.
22. Lee EJ, Jung HK, Ko KH, Lee JT, Yoon JH. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses? Eur Radiol 2013; 23:1803-1811.
23. Rzymski P, Skórzewska A, Skibińska-Zielińska M, Opala T. Factors influencing breast elasticity measured by the ultrasound shear wave elastog-raphy: preliminary results. Arch Med Sci 2011; 7:127-133.
24. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, et al. Real-time elastography-an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28:335-340.
25. Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ. Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. Radiology 2011; 259:59-64.