Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: Initial experience in solid breast masses

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Evans, Andrew ^a   Whelehan, Patsy ^a   Thomson, Kim ^b   McLean, Denis ^b   Brauer, Katrin ^b   Purdie, Colin ^b   Jordan, Lee ^b   Baker, Lee ^a   Thompson, Alastair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORTHOGONAL ROTATION; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; ULTRASOUND; ADOLESCENT; BREAST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROADENOMA; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 78649498473     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/bcr2787     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, Van De Vijver MJ, Van Voorthuisen AE. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 1999, 213:413-422.
2. Lister D, Evans AJ, Burrell HC, Blamey RW, Wilson ARM, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Kollias J. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps. Clin Radiol 1998, 53:490-492. 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80167-0, 9714387.
3. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995, 196:123-134.
4. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Wenkel E, Lux MP, Schrauder M, Koscheck T, Bautz W, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Bani MR. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol 2006, 60:398-404. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.002, 17030108.
5. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF, Truell JE, Price JG, Kortz AB, Clark DG. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993, 187:507-511.
6. Fleury E, Fleury JSV, Piato S, Roveda D. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression. Diagn Interv Radiol 2009, 15:96-103.
7. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006, 239:341-350. 10.1148/radiol.2391041676, 16484352.
8. Schaefer FKW, Heer I, Schaefer PJ, Mundhenke C, Osterholz S, Order BM, Hofheinz N, Hedderich J, Heller M, Jonat W, Schreer I. Breast ultrasound elastography - results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 2009,
9. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, Hesley GK, Sisney GA, Svensson WE, Fine JP, Jiang J, Hangiandreou NJ. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007, 245:401-410. 10.1148/radiol.2452061805, 17940302.
10. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, Morton MJ, Nordland MR, Meixner DD, Hall TJ, Farrell MA, Mandrekar JN, Harmsen WS, Charboneau JW. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging - clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006, 238:425-437. 10.1148/radiol.2381041336, 1761922, 16436810.
11. Chung SY, Moon WK, Choi JW, Cho N, Jang M, Kim KG. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography. Acta Radiol 2010, 51:9-14. 10.3109/02841850903273966, 19929254.
12. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004, 51:396-409. 10.1109/TUFFC.2004.1295425, 15139541.
13. Fink M, Tanter M. Multiwave imaging and super resolution. Phys Today 2010, 63:28-33.
14. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, Deffieux T, Gennisson J-L, Montaldo G, Muller M, Tardivon A, Fink M. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008, 34:1373-1386. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.002, 18395961.
15. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Fink M, Neuenschwander S. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - preliminary results. Radiology 2010, 256:297-303. 10.1148/radiol.10090385, 20505064.
16. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4., http://www.acr.org
17. National Research Ethics Service Approval for Medical Devices Research: Guidance for Researchers, Manufacturers, Research Ethics Committees and NHS R&D Offices. Version 2 2008, London: National Patient Safety Agency, National Research Ethics Service.
18. Medizinische Fakultät - Universität Ulm. , http://www.uni-ulm.de/med/fakultaet.html