Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging

Radiology

Volumn 245, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 401-410

  Burnside, Elizabeth S ^a   Hall, Timothy J ^a   Sommer, Amy M ^a   Hesley, Gina K ^b   Sisney, Gale A ^a   Svensson, William E ^c   Fine, Jason P ^d   Jiang, Jinfeng ^a   Hangiandreou, Nicholas J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 35349031710     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2452061805     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Poplack SP, Carney PA, Weiss JE, Titus-Ernstoff L, Goodrich ME, Tosteson AN. Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services. Radiology 2005;234:79-85.
2. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134.
3. Bruening W, Launders J, Pinkney N, Kostinsky H, Schoelles K, Turkelson C. Effectiveness of noninvasive diagnostic tests for breast abnormalities: comparative effectiveness review no. 2 (prepared by ECRI Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-02-0019). Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006.
4. Doyley MM, Bamber JC, Fuechsel F, Bush NL. A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: system development and performance evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1347-1357.
5. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997;202:79-86.
6. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:427-435.
7. Hiltawsky KM, Kruger M, Starke C, Heuser L, Ermert H, Jensen A. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1461-1469.
8. Insana MF, Pellot-Barakat C, Sridhar M, Lindfors KK. Viscoelastic imaging of breast tumor microenvironment with ultrasound. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004;9:393-404.
9. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341-350.
10. Lerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ. "Sonoelasticity" images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:231-239.
11. Lubinski MA, Emelianov Y, O'Donnell M. Adaptive strain estimation using retrospective processing. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1999;46:97-107.
12. Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Nightingale RW, Trahey GE. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:625-634.
13. O'Donnell M, Skovoroda A, Shapo B, Emelianov S. Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1994;41:314-325.
14. Ophir J, Alam SK, Garra B, et al. Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1999;213:203-233.
15. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991;13:111-134.
16. Ophir J, Kallel F, Varghese T. Elastography: a systems approach. Int J Imaging Syst Tech 1997;8:89-103.
17. Pesavento A, Lorenz A, Ermet H. System for real-time elastography. Elect Lett 1999;35:941-942.
18. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging - clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006;238:425-437.
19. Skovoroda A, Emelianov S, O'Donnell M. Tissue elasticity reconstruction based on ultrasonic displacement and strain images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1995;42:747-765.
20. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Hall T. The elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998;20:260-274.
21. Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, Kern KA, Howe RD. Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch Surg 2001;136:204-208.
22. Hangiandreou NJ, Meixner DM, Hesley GK. Ultrasound strain image data obtained in breast masses: preliminary quantitative analysis [abstr]. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:S178.
23. Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, Baldassarre S. Elastosonography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report. Radiol Med (Torino) 2005;110:69-76.
24. Zhu Y, Hall TJ. A modified block matching method for real-time freehand strain imaging. Ultrason Imaging 2002;24:161-176.
25. Jiang J, Hall T, Sommer A. A novel performance descriptor for ultrasonic strain imaging: a preliminary study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006;53:1088-1102.
26. Jiang J, Hall TJ, Sommer AM. A novel image formation method for ultrasound strain imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33(4):643-652.
27. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2004.
28. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998;18:110-121.
29. Zhou X, Obuchowski N, McClish D. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York, NY: Wiley, 2002.
30. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ. Initial clinical experience with ultrasound strain imaging for the evaluation of breast masses [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2003; 213.
31. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179:463-468.
32. Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:691-695.
33. Hall TJ, Svensson W, Von Behren P. Lesion size ratio for differentiating breast masses. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Book of Abstracts, 2003; 87-88.
34. Landini L, Sarnelli R, Salvadori M, Squartini F. Orientation and frequency-dependence of backscatter coefficient in normal and pathologic breast tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987;13:77-83.