Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 67-80

  Egorov, Vladimir ^a   Kearney, Thomas ^b   Pollak, Stanley B ^c   Rohatgi, Chand ^d   Sarvazyan, Noune ^a   Airapetian, Suren ^a   Browning, Stephanie ^e   Sarvazyan, Armen ^a  

^a ARTANN Laboratories Inc   (United States)

^b RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^c Rockville Centre   (United States)

^d Breast Care Center and General Surgery Practice   (United States)

^e NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Diagnostic elastography; Malignancy detection; Tissue differentiation

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST MECHANICAL IMAGING; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BIOPSY; BREAST CYST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HARDNESS; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRESSURE; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 70349909852     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0369-2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ED Pisano C Gatsonis E Hendrick, et al. 2005 Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 1773 1783 10.1056/NEJMoa052911 10.1056/NEJMoa052911 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFKrtLnN 16169887 (Pubitemid 41549889)
2. P Skaane S Hofvind A Skjennald 2007 Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study Radiology 244 708 717 10.1148/radiol.2443061478 10.1148/radiol.2443061478 17709826 (Pubitemid 47292081)
3. American Cancer Society: breast cancer facts & Figs 2007-2008. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
4. A Altmann K Hellerhoff SH Heywang-Köbrunner 2006 Screening in women with increased breast cancer risk Breast Care 1 22 25 10.1159/000091116 10.1159/000091116 (Pubitemid 43340994)
5. WA Berg JD Blume JB Cormack, et al. 2008 Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2151 2163 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151 10.1001/jama.299.18. 2151 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlvFCnsrY%3D 18477782 (Pubitemid 351679706)
6. S Ely AN Vioral 2007 Breast cancer overview Plast Surg Nurs 27 128 133 17901821
7. Adhani AR, Ah-See ML, Makris A (2005) MRI in the detection and management of breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 239-252
8. FQ Vandermeer DA Bluemke 2007 Breast MRI: state of the art Cancer Invest 25 384 392 10.1080/07357900701360013 10.1080/07357900701360013 17882648 (Pubitemid 47454500)
9. S McDonald D Saslow MN Alciati 2004 Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature CA Cancer J Clin 54 345 361 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.345 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.345 15537577 (Pubitemid 40073991)
10. N Oestreicher E White CD Lehman, et al. 2002 Predictors of sensitivity of clinical breast examination (CBE) Breast Cancer Res Treat 76 73 81 10.1023/A:1020280623807 10.1023/A:1020280623807 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XntVKjurs%3D 12408378 (Pubitemid 35178630)
11. C Bancej K Decker A Chiarelli, et al. 2003 Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer J Med Screen 10 16 21 10.1258/096914103321610761 10.1258/ 096914103321610761 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3msVSitQ%3D%3D 12790311 (Pubitemid 36560963)
12. D Saslow J Hannan J Osuch, et al. 2004 Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting CA Cancer J Clin 54 327 344 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.327 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.327 15537576 (Pubitemid 40073990)
13. MB Barton R Harris SW Fletcher 1999 Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 282 1270 1280 10.1001/jama.282.13.1270 10.1001/jama.282.13.1270 1:STN:280: DyaK1MvksFSiuw%3D%3D 10517431 (Pubitemid 29468500)
14. JK Bobo NC Lee SF Thames 2000 Findings from 752, 081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998 J Natl Cancer Inst 92 971 976 10.1093/jnci/92.12.971 10.1093/jnci/92.12.971 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czitV2nsw%3D%3D 10861308
15. A Sarvazyan 1998 Mechanical imaging: a new technology for medical diagnostics Int J Med Inform 49 195 216 10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00040-9 10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00040-9 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvht12htw%3D%3D 9741894 (Pubitemid 28362440)
16. Egorov V, Sarvazyan A (2007) Breast tissue characterization by means of surface stress patterns analysis. Abstracts of 32nd International Symposium on Ultrasonic Imaging and Tissue Characterization, Arlington, p 45
17. V Egorov AP Sarvazyan 2008 Mechanical imaging of the breast IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28 9 1275 1287 10.1109/TMI.2008.922192 10.1109/TMI.2008.922192
18. Schnitt ST, Connolly JL (2004) Pathology breast disorders. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) Diseases of the breast. Wolters Kluwer Company, Philadelphia, pp 77-99
19. Schnitt ST, Guidi AJ (2004) Pathology of invasive breast cancer. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) Diseases of the breast. Wolters Kluwer Company, Philadelphia, pp 541-584
20. American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures (2007) American Cancer Society, Atlanta
21. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Princeton
22. R McGill JW Tukey WA Larsen 1978 Variations of box plots Am Stat 32 12 16 10.2307/2683468 10.2307/2683468
23. AK Gayen 1951 The frequency distribution of the product moment correlation coefficient in random samples of any size draw from non-normal universes Biometrika 38 219 247 1:STN:280:DyaG3M%2FnslKktg%3D%3D 14848124
24. TA Lasko JG Bhagwat KH Zou L Ohno-Machado 2005 The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics J Biomed Inform 38 404 415 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008 16198999 (Pubitemid 41405811)
25. JA Swets 1988 Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems Science 240 1285 1293 10.1126/science.3287615 10.1126/science.3287615 1:STN:280: DyaL1c3jsF2jtQ%3D%3D 3287615
26. Rish I (2001) An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. IBM Research Report RC 22230, Available online: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~isbell/ reading/papers/Rish.pdf Accessed 23 Sep 2008
27. S Kotsiantis P Pintelas 2005 Logitboost of simple Bayesian classifier. Computational intelligence in data mining Spec Issue Informatica J 29 1 53 59
28. P Domingos M Pazzani 1997 On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss Mach Learn 29 103 130 10.1023/A:1007413511361 10.1023/A:1007413511361
29. Sarvazyan AP (1998) Computerized palpation is more sensitive than human finger. In: Proceeding of 12th Int Symposium on Biomedical Measurements and Instrumentation. Dubrovnik-Croatia, pp 523-524
30. RE Weiss V Hartanto M Perrotti, et al. 2001 In vitro trial of the pilot prototype of the prostate mechanical imaging system. Urology 58 6 1059 1063 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01407-8 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01407-8 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnpvV2hsg%3D%3D 11744495 (Pubitemid 34017306)
31. TJ Kearney S Airapetian AP Sarvazyan 2004 Tactile breast imaging to increase the sensitivity of breast examination J Clin Oncol 22S 103
32. T Gathani D Bull J Green G Reeves V Beral the Million Women Study Collaborators 2005 Breast cancer histological classification: agreement between the Office for National Statistics and the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Breast Cancer Res 7 R1090 R1096 10.1186/bcr1352 10.1186/bcr1352 16457689
33. Sarvazyan AP (2001) Elastic properties of soft tissues. In: Levy M, Bass H, Stern R (eds) Handbook of elastic properties of solids, liquids and gases, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 107-127 (Chap 5)
34. AR Skovoroda AN Klishko DA Gusakyan, et al. 1995 Quantitative analysis of the mechanical characteristics of pathologically changed soft biological tissues Biophysics 40 1359 1364
35. TA Krouskop TM Wheeler F Kallel BS Garra T Hall 1998 Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression Ultrason Imaging 20 260 274 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3htlSqtA%3D%3D 10197347
36. Wellman P, Howe RH, Dalton E, Kern KA (1999) Breast tissue stiffness in compression is correlated to histological diagnosis. Technical Report, Harvard Biorobotics Laboratory, pp 1-15
37. A Itoh E Ueno E Tohno, et al. 2006 Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis Radiology 9 341 350 10.1148/radiol.2391041676 10.1148/radiol.2391041676
38. XF Zhang XM Liu XF Bao, et al. 2006 Application of real-time tissue elastography in diagnosis of breast cancer Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 35 444 447 16924712 (Article in Chinese)
39. A Thomas T Fischer H Frey R Ohlinger S Grunwald JU Blohmer, et al. 2006 Real-time elastography-an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28 335 340 10.1002/uog.2823 10.1002/uog.2823 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28ritVymsQ%3D%3D 16909438 (Pubitemid 44409062)
40. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Fink M (2006) MR-elastography is capable of increasing the specificity of MR-mammography-influence of rheology on the diagnostic gain. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Ultrasonic Measurement and Imaging of Tissue Elasticity, Snowbird, p 111
41. DM Regner GK Hesley NJ Hangiandreou, et al. 2006 Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging-clinical experience of multiple observers Radiology 238 425 437 10.1148/radiol.2381041336 10.1148/radiol.2381041336 16436810 (Pubitemid 43134355)
42. Barr RG, Grajo JR (2007) Initial results of real-time elasticity imaging in the evaluation of breast lesions. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Ultrasonic Measurement and Imaging of Tissue Elasticity, Santa Fe, p 94
43. Garra BS, Mobbs LM, Chant CM, Ophir J (2006) Clinical breast elastography: blinded reader performance and strategies for improving reader performance. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Ultrasonic Measurement and Imaging of Tissue Elasticity, Snowbird, p 60
44. ES Burnside TJ Hall AM Sommer, et al. 2007 Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging Radiology 245 401 410 10.1148/radiol.2452061805 10.1148/radiol.2452061805 17940302 (Pubitemid 47612520)
45. Svensson WE, Zaman N, Barrett NK, et al. (2007) Breast elasticity imaging aids patient management in the one stop breast clinic. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Ultrasonic Measurement and Imaging of Tissue Elasticity, Santa Fe, p 128
46. CS Kaufman L Jacobson B Bachman L Kaufman 2006 Digital documentation of the physical examination: moving the clinical breast exam to the electronic medical record Am J Surg 192 444 449 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.006 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.006 16978946 (Pubitemid 44344202)
47. M Tanter J Bercoff A Athanasiou, et al. 2008 Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging Ultrasound Med Biol 34 9 1373 1386 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.002 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.002 18395961
48. A Sarvazyan V Egorov JS Son CS Kaufman 2008 Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions Breast Cancer Basic Clin Res 1 91 99
49. W Liang W Lawrence CB Burnett, et al. 2003 Acceptability of diagnostic tests for breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 79 199 206 10.1023/A: 1023914612152 10.1023/A:1023914612152 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXktV2qurs%3D 12825854 (Pubitemid 36649169)
50. D Gur LP Wallace AH Klym, et al. 2005 Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice Radiology 235 396 401 10.1148/radiol.2352040422 10.1148/radiol.2352040422 15770039 (Pubitemid 40571074)