Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions

European Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2381-2389

  Scaperrotta, Gianfranco ^a   Ferranti, Claudio ^a   Costa, Claudia ^a   Mariani, Luigi ^a   Marchesini, Monica ^a   Suman, Laura ^a   Folini, Cristina ^a   Bergonzi, Silvana ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breast ultrasound; Non palpable breast lesions; Sonoelastography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; B SCAN; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST LESION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; NON PALPABLE BREAST LESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SONOELASTOGRAPHY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 54049139588     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1032-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blohmer JU, Oellinger H, Schmidt C, Hufnagl P, Felix R, Lichtenegger W (1999) Comparison of various imaging methods with particular evaluation of color Doppler sonography for planning surgery of breast tumors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 262:159-171
2. Schroeder RJ, Bostanjoglo M, Rademaker J, Maeurer J, Felix R (2003) Role of power Doppler techniques and ultrasound contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of focal breast lesions. Eur Radiol 13:68-79
3. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196:123-134
4. Tardivon AA, Guinebretiere JM, Dromain C, Vanel D (2002) Imaging and management of nonpalpable lesions of the breast. Eur J Radiol 42:2-9
5. Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Coerkamp EG (2000) Ultrasound variables and their prognostic value in a population of 1,103 patients with 272 breast cancers. Eur Radiol 10:1562-1568
6. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th edn. ACR, Reston, VA. Available at: http://www.acr.org
7. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yadzi Y, Li X (1991) Elastosonography: A quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imag 13:11-134
8. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, Spratt SR, Zuurbier RA, Magnant CM, Pennanen MF (1997) Elastography of breast lesions: Initial clinical results. Radiology 202:79-86
9. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsamura T (2006) Breast disease: Clinical application of US Elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341-350
10. Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, Baldassarre S (2005) Elastosonografia nella caratterizzazione delle lesioni nodulari della mammella/Elastosonography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: Preliminary report. Radiol Med 110:69-76
11. Thomas A, Kummel S, Fritzsche F, Warm M, Ebert B, Hamm B, Fischer T (2006) Real-time sonoelastography performed in addition to B-Mode ultrasound and mammography: Improved differentiation of breast lesions? Acad Radiol 13:1496-1504
12. Locatelli M, Rizzatto G, Aiani L, Martegani A, Baldassarre S, Giuseppetti GM, Bulzacchi A, Di Maggio C, Della Sala SW, Mangialavori G, Monno P, Lattanzio E, Scaperrotta G, Floriani I (2007) Characterization of breast lesions with real-time sonoelastography: Results from the Italian Multicenter clinical trial. Eur Radiol 17(Suppl 1):200 (ECR 2007 - Book of abstracts)
13. Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJT (1987) Aberrations of normal development and involution (ANDI): A new perspective on pathogenesis and nomenclature of benign breast disorders. Lancet 2:1316-1319
14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29-36
15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843
16. Hiltawsky KK, Kruger M, Starke C, Heuser L, Ermert H, Jensen A (2001) Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: Clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:1461-1469
17. Konofagou EE (2004) Quo vadis elasticity imaging? Ultrasonics 42:331-336
18. Ueno E, Iboraki P (2004) Clinical application of US elastography in the diagnosis of breast disease. European Congress of Radiology, Vienna
19. Sarvazyan AP, Skovoroda AR, Emelianov SY et al (1995) Biophysical bases of elasticity imaging. Acoustical Imaging 21:223-240
20. Walz M, Teubner J, Georgi M et al (1993) Elasticity of benign and malignant breast lesion: Imaging, application and results in clinical and general practice. 8th International Congress on the Ultrasonic Examination of the breast
21. Sewell CW (1995) Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 33(6):1067-1080
22. Tardivon AA, Delignette A, Lemery S, Baratte B, Levy L, David P, Le Mouel A, Balu-Maestro C, Scheffer B (2006) Ultrasound elastography: results of a French multicentric prospective study about 345 breast lesions. Eur Radiol 16(Suppl 1):213