Suprasegmental measures of accentedness

Social Dynamics in Second Language Accent

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 75-94

  Pickering, Lucy ^a   Baker, Amanda ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907561265     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. 1992. The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning 38, 561-593.
2. Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Venkatagiri, H. 1994. Syllable duration and pausing in the speech of Chinese ESL speakers. TESOL Quarterly 28, 807-812.
3. Backman, N.E. 1979. Intonation errors in second language pronunciation of eight Spanish speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4, 239-266.
4. Bradford, B. 1988. Intonation in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bradlow, A., & Bent, T. 2008. Perceptual adaptation to nonnative speech. Cognition 106, 707-729.
6. Brazil, D. 1985. The communicative value of intonation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, English Language Research.
7. Brazil. D. 1997. The communicative role of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Breiteneder, A., Pitzl, M., Majewski, S., & Klimpfinger, T. 2006. VIOCE recording: Methodological callenges in the compilation of a corpus of spoken ELF. Nordic Journal of English Studies 5(2), 161-187.
9. Cauldwell, R. 2003. Streaming speech: Listening and pronunciation for advanced learners of English. Birmingham: Speechinaction.
10. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D.M., Goodwin, J.M., & Griner, B. 2010. Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Chapelle, C., & Chung, Y. 2010. The promise of NLP and speech processing technologies in language assessment. Language Testing 27, 301-315.
12. Cheng, W. 2002. Indirectness in intercultural communication. Conference on the Pragmatics of Interlanguage. Munster University, Germany, 22-25 Spetember 2002.
13. Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. 2008. A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Cheng, W. & Warren, P. 2005.//→well i have a DIFferent//↘THINKing you know//: A corpus driven study of disagreement in Hong Kong business discourse. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Gotti (Eds.), Asian Business Discourse(s) (pp. 241-270). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
15. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. 1968. The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Chun, D. 1988. The neglected role of intonation in communicative competence and proficiency. Modern Language Journal 72, 295-303.
17. Chun, D. 2002. Discourse intonation in L2. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
18. de Bot, K. 1980. The role of feedback and feedforward in the teaching of pronunciation: An overview. System 8, 35-45.
19. Derwing, T.M., & Munro, M. 1997. Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1), 1-16.
20. Derwing, T. & Rossiter, M. 2003. ESL learners' perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System 30, 155-166.
21. Derwing, T.M., Rossiter, M.J., Munro, M.J., & Thomson, R.I. 2004. L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning 54, 655-679.
22. Deterding, D. 2005. Listening to estuary English in Singapore TESOL Quarterly 39(3), 425-440.
23. Edge, J., & Richards, K. 1998. May I see your warrant please? Justifying outcomes in qualitative research. Applied Linguistics 19, 334-356.
24. Field, J. 2005. Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly 39, 399-423.
25. Freed, B.F. 2000. Is fluency, like beauty, the eyes, of the beholder? In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 243-265). Ann Arbor, MI: the University of Michigan Press.
26. Gallego, J.C. 1990. The intelligibility of three nonnative English-speaking TAs: An analysis of student-reported communication breakdowns. Issues in Applied Linguistics 1, 219-237.
27. Gatbonton, E., Trofimovich, P., & Magid, M. 2005. Learners' ethnic group affiliation and L2 pronunciation accuracy: A sociolinguistic investigation. TESOL Quarterly 39(3), 489-512.
28. Guiora, A., Beit-Hallahmi, B., Brannon, R., Dull, C. & Scovel, T. (1972) The effects of experimentally induced changes in ego states on pronunciation ability in a second language: An exploratory study. Comprehensive Psychiatry 13, 421-428.
29. Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Gumperz, J. 1983. Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Gumperz, J. 1992. Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Gumperz, J., Kaltman, H., & O'Connor, M. 1984. Cohesion in spoken and written discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp.3-19). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Gut, U. 2007. Learner corpora in second language prosody rsearch and teaching. In J. Trouvain & U. Gut (Eds.), Non-native prosody (pp. 145-167). Berlin: Mouton.
34. Hahn, L.D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 38, 201-223.
35. Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Intonation and grammar in British English. Paris: Mouton.
36. Halliday, M.A.K. 1970. A course in spoken English: Intonation. London: Oxford University Press.
37. Hansen, J.G. 2006. Acquiring a non-native phonology. London: Continuum.
38. Hewings, M. 1995. Tone choice in the English intonation of nonnative speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics 33, 251-265.
39. Hincks, R., & Edlund, J. 2009. Promoting increased pitch variation in oral presentations with transient visual feedback. Language Learning & Technology 13(3), 32-50.
40. Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolin-guistics (pp. 269-285). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
41. Ingram, J.C.L., & Park, S.G. 1997. Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 343-370.
42. Iwashita, N. 2010. Features of oral proficiency in task performance by EFL and JFL learners. In M.T. Prior (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum, (pp. 32-47). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
43. Jenkins, J. 2000. The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Jenkins, J. 2002. A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation program syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics 23, 83-103.
45. Jenkins, J. 2005. Implementing an international approach to English pronunciation: The role of teacher attitudes and identity. TESOL Quarterly 39(3), 535-543. doi: 10.2307/3588493
46. Jenner, B. 1976. Interlanguage and foreign accent. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 1, 166-195.
47. Jilka, M. 2007. Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation. In J. Trouvain & U. Gut (Eds.), Non-native prosody. Phonetic description and teaching practice (pp. 77-96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
48. Jun, H.G., & Li, J. 2010. Factors in raters' perceptions of comprehensibility and accentedness. In J.M. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 53-66). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
49. Kachru, B.B. 1992. The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
50. Kang, O. 2010. ESL learners' attitudes toward pronunciation instruction. In J.M. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 105-118). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
51. Kang, O. 2012. Impact of rater characteristics and prosodic features of speaker accentedness on ratings of international teaching assistants' oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly 9(3), 249-269. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2011.642631
52. Kang, O., & Pickering, L. 2011. The role of objective measures of suprasegmental features in judgments of comprehensibility and oral proficiency in L2 spoken discourse. Speak Out! 44, 4-8.
53. Kang, O. & Rubin, D. 2009. Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28, 441-456.
54. Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. 2010. Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal 94, 554-566.
55. Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. 2008. Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review 64(3), 459-489. doi: 10.1353/cml.2008.0034
56. Koffi, E. 2012. Intelligibility assessment and the acoustic vowel space: An instrumental phonetic account of the production of lax vowel vowels by Somali speakers. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Sept. 2011. (pp. 216-232), Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
57. Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. 2004. Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System 32, 145-164.
58. Lai, E. 2002. Prosody and prosodic transfer in foreign language acquisition. Muenchen: LINCOM EUROPA.
59. Levis, J.M. 2005. Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly 39(3), 369-378.
60. Levis, J. & Pickering, L. 2004. Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology, System 32, 505-524.
61. Lima, E. 2012. A comparative study of the perception of ITAs and native and nonnative undergraduates. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Sept. 2011. (pp.54-64), Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
62. Lindemann, S. 2005. Who speaks "broken English"? US undergraduates' perceptions of non-native English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(2), 187-212.
63. Major, R.C., Fitzmaurice, S.F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. 2002. The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly 36(2), 173-190.
64. Matsuura, H. 2007. Intelligibility and individual learner differences in the EIL context. System 35(3), 293-304.
65. Mennen, I. 1998. Second language acquisition of intonation: The case of peak alignment, Chicago Linguistic Society 34, 327-341.
66. Mennen, I. 2007. Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. In J. Trouvain & U. Gut (Eds.) Non-native prosody. Phonetic description and teaching practice (pp. 53-76). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
67. Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45(1), 73-97.
68. Munro, M.J., & Derwing, T.M., 2001. Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, 451-468.
69. O'Connor, J.D. & Arnold, G.F. 1961. Intonation of colloquial English. London: Longman.
70. Ohara, Y. 2001. Finding one's voice in Japanese: A study of the pitch Levels of L2 users. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller and M. Teutsch-Dwyer (eds.) Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender (pp.231-254). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
71. Pennington, M. & Richards, J. 1988. Pronunciation revisited. TESOL Quarterly 20, 207-225.
72. Pickering, L. 1999. An analysis of prosodic systems in the classroom discourse of native speaker and non-native speaker teaching assistants. Unpublished dissertation, University of Florida.
73. Pickering, L. 2001. The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly 35, 233-255.
74. Pickering, L. 2004. The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes 23(1), 19-43.
75. Pickering, L. 2009. Intonation as a pragmatic resource in ELF interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 6(2): 235-255.
76. Pickering, L. & Litzenberg, J. 2011. Intonation as a pragmatic resource, revisited. In A. Archibald, A. Cogo & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Latest trends in ELF. Cambridge Scholars.
77. Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
78. Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. Pollock (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-312). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
79. Pike, K. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
80. Pirt, G. 1990. Discourse intonation problems for nonnative speakers. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Papers in discourse intonation (pp. 145-156). University of Birmingham: ELR.
81. Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. 1986. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Riggenbach, H. 1991. Towards an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversation. Discourse Processes 14, 423-441.
83. Rounds, P. 1987. Characterizing successful classroom discourse for NNS teaching assistant training. TESOL Quarterly 21, 643-672.
84. Sapir, E. 1921. Language. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
85. Sifakis, N.C., & Sougari, A.-M. 2005. Pronunciation issues and EIL pedagogy in the periphery: A survey of Greek state school teachers' beliefs. TESOL Quarterly 39(3), 467-488. doi: 10.2307/3588490
86. Sinclair, J. & Brazil, D. 1982. Teacher talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87. Tao, H. 1996. Units in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
88. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. 2006. Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1), 1-30.
89. Warren, M. 2004.//î so what have YOU been WORKing on REcently//: Compiling a specialized corpus of spoken business English. In U. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 115-140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
90. Weltens, B., & de Bot, K. 1984. Visual feedback of intonation II: Feedback delay and quality of feedback. Language and Speech 27, 79-88.
91. Wennerstrom, A. 1994. Intonational meaning in discourse: A study of non-native speakers. Applied Linguistics 15, 399-420.
92. Wennerstrom, A. 1997. Discourse intonation and second language acquisition: Three genre-based studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
93. Wennerstrom, A., 2000. The role of intonation in second language fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 102-127). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
94. Willems, N.J. 1982. English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris.