The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 233-255

  Pickering, Lucy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038559425     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3587647     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1990). Teaching suprasegmentale to international teaching assistants using field-specific materials. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 195-214.
2. Ashton, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
3. Axelson, E. R., & Madden, C. G. (1994). Discourse strategies for ITAs across instructional contexts. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 153-186). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
4. Bailey, K. M. (1984). A typology of teaching assistants. In K. M. Bailey, F. Pialorski, & J. Zukowski/Faust (Eds.), Foreign teaching assistants in U.S. universities (pp. 110-130). Washington, DC: National Association of Foreign Student Advisers.
5. Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.
7. Byrd, P., & Constantinides, J. C. (1992). The language of teaching mathematics: Implications for training ITAs. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 163-167.
8. Chun, D. (1988). The neglected role of intonation in communicative competence and proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 72, 295-303.
9. Clennell, C. (1997). Raising the pedagogical status of discourse intonation teaching. English Language Teaching Journal, 51, 117-125.
10. Christophel, D. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
11. Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
13. Douglas, D., & Myers, C. (1989). TAs on TV: Demonstrating communication strategies for international teaching assistants. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 169-179.
14. Duranti, A. (1986). The audience as co-author. Text, 6, 239-247.
15. Educational Testing Service. (1996). SPEAK rater training guide. Princeton, NJ: Author.
16. Eisenstein, M. (1983). Native reactions to nonnative speech: A review of empirical research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 160-176.
17. Gilbert, J. (1993). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in North American English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Grant, L. (1993). Well said: Advanced English pronunciation. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
19. Green, G. (1989). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hewings, M. (1995). Tone choice in the English intonation of nonnative speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 251-265.
22. Hinofotis, F., & Bailey, K. (1980). American undergraduates' reactions to the communication skills of foreign teaching assistants. In J. Fisher, M. Clarke, & J. Schachter (Eds.), On TESOL '80: Building bridges (pp. 120-136). Washington, DC: TESOL.
23. Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. (1998). A survey of intonation systems. In D. Hirst & A. Di Cristo (Eds.), Intonation systems (pp. 1-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hoekje, B., & Williams, J. (1992). Communicative competence and the dilemma of international teaching assistant education. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 243-269.
25. Jacobson, W. (1986). An assessment of the communicative needs of non-native speakers of English in an undergraduate physics lab. English for Specific Purposes, 5, 173-187.
26. Jacoby, D., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 1-21.
27. Lane, L. (1993). Focus on pronunciation: Principles and practice for effective communication. New York: Longman.
28. Levis, J. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 37-64.
29. McChesney, B. J. (1994). The functional language of the U.S. TA during office hours. In C. G. Madden & C. L. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 134-152). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
30. Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73-97.
31. Nattinger, J., & DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Nevalainen, T. (1992). Intonational discourse types. Text, 12, 397-427.
33. Pica, T., & Long, M. (1986). The classroom linguistic and conversational performance of experienced and inexperienced teachers. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 85-98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
34. Pickering, L. (1999, March). Improving ITA presentations using prosodic analysis. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual TESOL Convention, New York.
35. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in English. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Pirt, G. (1990). Discourse intonation problems for nonnative speakers. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Papers in discourse intonation (pp. 145-155). Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham, English Language Research.
37. Rounds, P. L. (1987). Characterizing successful classroom discourse for NNS teaching assistant training. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 643-672.
38. Schuetze-Coburn, S., Shapley, M., & Weber, E. (1991). Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech, 34, 207-234.
39. Shaw, P. A. (1994). Discourse competence in a framework for ITA training. In C. G. Madden & C. L. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 27-51). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
40. Sinclair, J., & Brazil, D. (1982). Teacher talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Smith, J., Meyers, C., & Burkhalter, A. (1992). Communicate: Strategies for international teaching assistants. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
42. Tench, P. (1996). The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.
43. Thompson, S. (1994). Aspects of cohesion in monologue. Applied Linguistics, 15, 58-75.
44. Tyler, A. (1992). Discourse structure and the perception of incoherence in international teaching assistants' spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 713-729.
45. Tyler, A. (1995). The co-construction of cross-cultural miscommunication: Conflicts in perception, negotiation and enactment of participant role and status. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 129-152.
46. Tyler, A., & Davies, C. E. (1990). Cross-linguistic communication missteps. Text, 10, 385-411.
47. Tyler, A., Jefferies, A., & Davies, C. (1988). The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teachers' spoken discourse. World Englishes, 7, 101-110.
48. Vaissiere, J. (1983). Language-independent prosodic features. In A. Cutler & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements (pp. 53-66). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
49. Watt, D. (1997). The phonology and semology of intonation in English: An instrumental and systemic perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
50. Wennerstrom, A. (1994). Intonational meaning in English discourse. Applied Linguistics, 15, 399-421.
51. Wennerstrom, A. (1997). Discourse intonation and second language acquisition: Three genre based studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
52. Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1-25.
53. Wright, R., Frisch, S., & Pisoni, D. (1997). Research on spoken language processing (Progress Report No. 21). Bloomington: Indiana University, Speech Research Laboratory.
54. Yule, G. (1994). ITAs, interaction, and communicative effectiveness. In C. G. Madden & C. L. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 189-200). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.