Monte-carlo modeling of the central carbon metabolism of lactococcus lactis: Insights into metabolic regulation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Murabito, Ettore ^a   Verma, Malkhey ^a   Bekker, Martijn ^b   Bellomo, Domenico ^c   Westerhoff, Hans V ^a,b,c   Teusink, Bas ^c   Steuer, Ralf ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^e HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRUCTOSE 1,6 BISPHOSPHATE; GLUCOSE; PYRUVATE KINASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; FRUCTOSE BISPHOSPHATE; FRUCTOSE-1,6-DIPHOSPHATE;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; CARBON METABOLISM; ENZYME KINETICS; GLYCOLYSIS; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; METABOLIC REGULATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PROBABILITY; STARVATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; METABOLISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FRUCTOSEDIPHOSPHATES; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD;

EID: 84907545960     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106453     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Teusink B, Smid EJ (2006) Modelling strategies for the industrial exploitation of lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 46-56.
2. Teusink B, Bachmann H, Molenaar D (2011) Systems biology of lactic acid bacteria: a critical review. Microb Cell Fact 10 Suppl 1: S11.
3. Hoefnagel MHN, Starrenburg MJC, Martens DE, Hugenholtz J, Kleerebezem M, et al. (2002) Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria, the combined approach: kinetic modelling, metabolic control and experimental analysis. Microbiology 148: 1003-1013.
4. Hoefnagel MHN, van der Burgt A, Martens DE, Hugenholtz J, Snoep JL (2002) Time dependent responses of glycolytic intermediates in a detailed glycolytic model of Lactococcus lactis during glucose run-out experiments. Mol Biol Rep 29: 157-161.
5. Oliveira AP, Nielsen J, Förster J (2005) Modeling Lactococcus lactis using a genome-scale flux model. BMC Microbiol 5: 39.
6. Oddone GM, Mills DA, Block DE (2009) A dynamic, genome-scale flux model of Lactococcus lactis to increase specific recombinant protein expression. Metab Eng 11: 367-381.
7. Andersen AZ, Carvalho AL, Neves AR, Santos H, Kummer U, et al. (2009) The metabolic pH response in Lactococcus lactis: an integrative experimental and modelling approach. Comput Biol Chem 33: 71-83.
8. Lall R, Donohue TJ, Marino S, Mitchell JC (2011) Optimizing ethanol production selectivity. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 53: 13631373.
9. Oh E, Lu M, Park C, Park C, Oh HB, et al. (2011) Dynamic modeling of lactic acid fermentation metabolism with Lactococcus lactis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21: 162-169.
10. Levering J, Musters MWJM, Bekker M, Bellomo D, Fiedler T, et al. (2012) Role of phosphate in the central metabolism of two lactic acid bacteria - A comparative systems biology approach. FEBS J 279: 1274-1290.
11. Garrigues C, Loubiere P, Lindley ND, Cocaign-Bousquet M (1997) Control of the shift from homolactic acid to mixed-acid fermentation in Lactococcus lactis: predominant role of the NADH/NAD+ ratio. J Bacteriol 179: 5282-5287.
12. Neves AR, Ramos A, Shearman C, Gasson MJ, Almeida JS, et al. (2000) Metabolic characterization of Lactococcus lactis deficient in lactate dehydrogenase using in vivo 13C-NMR. Eur J Biochem 267: 3859-3868.
13. Neves AR, Ventura R, Mansour N, Shearman C, Gasson MJ, et al. (2002) Is the glycolytic flux in Lactococcus lactis primarily controlled by the redox charge? kinetics of NAD(+) and NADH pools determined in vivo by 13C NMR. J Biol Chem 277: 28088-28098.
14. Neves AR, Pool WA, Kok J, Kuipers OP, Santos H (2005) Overview on sugar metabolism and its control in Lactococcus lactis - the input from in vivo NMR. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 531-554.
15. Voit E, Neves AR, Santos H (2006) The intricate side of systems biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 9452-9457.
16. Voit EO, Almeida J, Marino S, Lall R, Goel G, et al. (2006) Regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis: an unfinished systems biological case study. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 153: 286-298.
17. Papagianni M, Avramidis N, Filiousis G (2007) Glycolysis and the regulation of glucose transport in Lactococcus lactis spp. lactis in batch and fed-batch culture. Microb Cell Fact 6: 16.
18. Heijnen JJ (2005) Approximative kinetic formats used in metabolic network modeling. Biotechnol Bioeng 91: 534-545.
19. Bulik S, Grimbs S, Huthmacher C, Selbig J, Holzhuetter HG (2009) Kinetic hybrid models composed of mechanistic and simplified enzymatic rate laws - A promising method for speeding up the kinetic modelling of complex metabolic networks. FEBS J 276: 410-424.
20. Wang L, Hatzimanikatis V (2006) Metabolic engineering under uncertainty. I: framework development. Metab Eng 8: 133-141.
21. Wang L, Hatzimanikatis V (2006) Metabolic engineering under uncertainty-II: analysis of yeast metabolism. Metab Eng 8: 142-159.
22. Wang L, Birol I, Hatzimanikatis V (2004) Metabolic control analysis under uncertainty: framework development and case studies. Biophys J 87: 3750-3763.
23. Gross T, Feudel U (2006) Generalized models as a universal approach to the analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 73: 016205.
24. Steuer R, Gross T, Selbig J, Blasius B (2006) Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 11868-11873.
25. Steuer R, Nesi AN, Fernie AR, Gross T, Blasius B, et al. (2007) From structure to dynamics of metabolic pathways: application to the plant mitochondrial TCA cycle. Bioinformatics 23: 1378-1385.
26. Tran LM, Rizk ML, Liao JC (2008) Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks. Biophys J 95: 5606-5617.
27. Tan Y, Rivera JGL, Contador CA, Asenjo JA, Liao JC (2011) Reducing the allowable kinetic space by constructing ensemble of dynamic models with the same steady-state flux. Metab Eng 13: 60-75.
28. Murabito E, Smallbone K, Swinton J, Westerhoff HV, Steuer R (2011) A probabilistic approach to identify putative drug targets in biochemical networks. J R Soc Interface 8: 880-895.
29. Girbig D, Grimbs S, Selbig J (2012) Systematic analysis of stability patterns in plant primary metabolism. PLoS One 7: e34686.
30. Murabito E (2013) Targeting breast cancer metabolism: A metabolic control analysis approach. Curr Synthetic Sys Biol 1: 104.
31. Notebaart RA, van Enckevort FHJ, Francke C, Siezen RJ, Teusink B (2006) Accelerating the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 296.
32. Novák L, Loubiere P (2000) The metabolic network of Lactococcus lactis: distribution of (14)Clabeled substrates between catabolic and anabolic pathways. J Bacteriol 182: 1136-1143.
33. Liebermeister W, Uhlendorf J, Klipp E (2010) Modular rate laws for enzymatic reactions: thermodynamics, elasticities and implementation. Bioinformatics 26: 1528-1534.
34. Feist AM, Henry CS, Reed JL, Krummenacker M, Joyce AR, et al. (2007) A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol Syst Biol 3: 121.
35. Burns J, Cornish-Bowden A, Groen A, Heinrich R, Kacser H, et al. (1985) Control analysis of metabolic systems. Trends Biochem Sci 10: 16.
36. Heinrich R, Schuster S (1996) The Regulation Of Cellular Systems. Chapman & Hall, New York.
37. Gutenkunst RN, Waterfall JJ, Casey FP, Brown KS, Myers CR, et al. (2007) Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comput Biol 3: 1871-1878.
38. Steuer R, Junker BH (2009) Computational models of metabolism: Stability and regulation in metabolic networks. Advances in Chemical Physics (ed Stuart A Rice).John Wiley & Sons 142.
39. Koebmann BJ, Andersen HW, Solem C, Jensen PR (2002) Experimental determination of control of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82: 237-248.
40. Solem C, Koebmann BJ, Jensen PR (2003) Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase has no control over glycolytic flux in Lactococcus lactis MG1363. J Bacteriol 185: 1564-1571.
41. Koebmann B, Solem C, Jensen PR (2005) Control analysis as a tool to understand the formation of the las operon in Lactococcus lactis. FEBS J 272: 2292-2303.
42. Solem C, Koebmann B, Yang F, Jensen PR (2007) The las enzymes control pyruvate metabolism in Lactococcus lactis during growth on maltose. J Bacteriol 189: 6727-6730.
43. Koebmann BJ, Westerhoff HV, Snoep JL, Nilsson D, Jensen PR (2002) The glycolytic flux in Escherichia coli is controlled by the demand for ATP. J Bacteriol 184: 3909-3916.
44. Rosenfeld N, Elowitz MB, Alon U (2002) Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. J Mol Biol 323: 785-793.
45. Bluethgen N (2010) Transcriptional feedbacks in mammalian signal transduction pathways facilitate rapid and reliable protein induction. Mol Biosyst 6: 1277-1284.
46. Xu YF, Amador-Noguez D, Reaves ML, Feng XJ, Rabinowitz JD (2012) Ultrasensitive regulation of anapleurosis via allosteric activation of PEP carboxylase. Nat Chem Biol 8: 562-568.
47. van Heerden J, Wortel M, Bruggeman F, Heijnen J, Bollen Y, et al. (2014) Lost in transition: Startup of glycolysis yields subpopulations of nongrowing cells. Science 343: 1245114ff.
48. Soh KC, Miskovic L, Hatzimanikatis V (2012) From network models to network responses: integration of thermodynamic and kinetic properties of yeast genomescale metabolic networks. FEMS Yeast Res 12: 129-143.
49. Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T (2000) A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat Biotechnol 18: 326-332.
50. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson B (2010) What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 28: 245-248.
51. Grimbs S, Selbig J, Bulik S, Holzhuetter HG, Steuer R (2007) The stability and robustness of metabolic states: identifying stabilizing sites in metabolic networks. Mol Syst Biol 3: 146.
52. Rohwer JM, Hanekom AJ, Crous C, Snoep JL, Hofmeyr JHS (2006) Evaluation of a simplified generic bi-substrate rate equation for computational systems biology. Syst Biol (Stevenage) 153: 338-341.
53. Jönsson M, Saleihan Z, Nes IF, Holo H (2009) Construction and characterization of three lactate dehydrogenase-negative Enterococcus faecalis V583 mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 4901-4903.
54. Wouters JA, Frenkiel H, de Vos WM, Kuipers OP, Abee T (2011) Cold shock proteins of lactococcus lactis MG1363 are involved in cryoprotection and in the production of cold-induced proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 5171-5178.
55. Alexeeva S, de Kort B, Sawers G, Hellingwerf KJ, de Mattos MJ (2000) Effects of limited aeration and of the arcAB system on intermediary pyruvate catabolism in escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 182: 4934-4940.
56. Mavrovouniotis ML, Stephanopoulos G, Stephanopoulos G (1990) Computeraided synthesis of biochemical pathways. Biotechnol Bioeng 36: 1119-1132.
57. Mavrovouniotis ML (1991) Estimation of standard Gibbs energy changes of biotransformations. J Biol Chem 266: 14440-14445.