Regularizing Mono- and Bi-Word Models for Word Alignment

IJCNLP 2011 - Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1313-1322

  Schoenemann, Thomas ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

GARBAGE COLLECTION; ITERATIVE SCHEMES; OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; SINGLE WORDS; TARGET WORDS; TWO SOURCES; WORD ALIGNMENT; WORD MODELING; WORD-BASED MODEL;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84907322786     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Y. Al-Onaizan, J. Curin, M. Jahr, K. Knight, J. Lafferty, I. D. Melamed, F. J. Och, D. Purdy, N. A. Smith, and D. Yarowsky. 1999. Statistical machine translation, Final report, JHU workshop. http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/ws99/.
2. L.E. Baum, T. Petrie, G. Soules, and N. Weiss. 1970. A maximization technique occuring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41(1):164-171.
3. T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, A. Bouchard-Côté, J. DeNero, and D. Klein. 2010. Painless unsupervised learning with features. In Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistisc (NAACL), Los Angeles, California, June.
4. D.P. Bertsekas. 1999. Nonlinear Programming, 2nd edition. Athena Scientific.
5. P.F. Brown, S.A. Della Pietra, V.J. Della Pietra, and R.L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):263-311, June.
6. J. DeNero, D. Gillick, J. Zhang, and D. Klein. 2006. Why generative phrase models underperform surface heuristics. In StatMT'06: Proceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 31-38, Morristown, NJ, USA, June.
7. Y. Deng and W. Byrne. 2005. HMM word and phrase alignment for statistical machine translation. In HLT-EMNLP, Vancouver, Canada, October.
8. A. Fraser and D. Marcu. 2007a. Getting the structure right for word alignment: LEAF. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Prague, Czech Republic, June.
9. A. Fraser and D. Marcu. 2007b. Measuring word alignment quality for statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 33(3):293-303, September.
10. K. Ganchev, J. Graça, J. Gillenwater, and B. Taskar. 2010. Posterior regularization for structured latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:2001-2049, July.
11. J. Graça, K. Ganchev, and B. Taskar. 2010. Learning tractable word alignment models with complex constraints. Computational Linguistics, 36, September.
12. S. Lacoste-Julien, B. Taskar, D. Klein, and M. Jordan. 2006. Word alignment via quadratic assignment. In Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, New York, New York, June.
13. P. Lambert, A.D. Gispert, R. Banchs, and J.B. Marino. 2005. Guidelines for word alignment evaluation and manual alignment. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39(4):267-285.
14. P. Liang, B. Taskar, and D. Klein. 2006. Alignment by agreement. In Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, New York, New York, June.
15. G.S. Mann and A. McCallum. 2007. Simple, robust, scalable semi-supervised learning via Expectation Regularization. In International Conference on Machine Learning, Corvallis, Oregon.
16. D. Marcu and W. Wong. 2002. A phrase-based, joint probability model for statistical machine translation. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July.
17. E. Matusov, R. Zens, and H. Ney. 2004. Symmetric word alignments for statistical machine translation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Geneva, Switzerland, August.
18. A. Mauser, S. Hasan, and H. Ney. 2009. Extending statistical machine translation with discriminative and trigger-based lexicon models. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Singapore, August.
19. D. Melamed. 2000. Models of translational equivalence among words. Computational Linguistics, 26(2):221-249.
20. n. Journal on Optimization Theory and Applications, 50(1), July.
21. R.M. Neal and G.E. Hinton. 1998. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In M.I. Jordan, editor, Learning in Graphical Models. MIT press.
22. F.J. Och and H. Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):19-51.
23. 0-norm. In Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), Portland, Oregon, June.
24. E. Sumita, Y. Akiba, T. Doi, A. Finch, K. Imamura, H. Okuma, M. Paul, M. Shimohata, and T. Watanabe. 2004. EBMT, SMT, Hybrid and more: ATR spoken language translation system. In International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation (IWSLT), Kyoto, Japan, September.
25. B. Taskar, S. Lacoste-Julien, and D. Klein. 2005. A discriminative matching approach to word alignment. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Vancouver, Canada, October.
26. K. Toutanova, H.T. Ilhan, and C.D. Manning. 2002. Extensions to HMM-based statistical word alignment models. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July.
27. S. Vogel, H. Ney, and C. Tillmann. 1996. HMM-based word alignment in statistical translation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 836-841, Copenhagen, Denmark, August.
28. Y.-Y. Wang and A. Waibel. 1998. Modeling with structures in statistical machine translation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Montreal, Canada, August.
29. R. Zens, E. Matusov, and H. Ney. 2004. Improved word alignment using a symmetric lexicon model. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Geneva, Switzerland, August.