Painless unsupervised learning with features

NAACL HLT 2010 - Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 582-590

  Berg Kirkpatrick, Taylor ^a   Bouchard Côté, Alexandre ^a   De Nero, John ^a   Klein, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINATIVE TRAINING; EM ALGORITHMS; GENERATIVE MODEL; GRADIENT BASED; GRAMMAR INDUCTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS; MULTINOMIALS; PART OF SPEECH; TRAINING METHODS; WORD ALIGNMENT; WORD SEGMENTATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LOGISTICS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84858386605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. N. F. Ayan, B. Dorr, and C. Monz. 2005. Combining word alignments using neural networks. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
2. N. Bernstein-Ratner. 1987. The phonology of parent-child speech. K. Nelson and A. van Kleeck.
3. M. Bisani and H. Ney. 2008. Joint-sequence models for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion.
4. A. Bouchard-Côté, P. Liang, D. Klein, and T. L. Griffiths. 2008. A probabilistic approach to language change. In Neural Information Processing Systems.
5. P. F. Brown, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, and R. L. Mercer. 1994. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics.
6. S. F. Chen. 2003. Conditional and joint models for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In Eurospeech.
7. S. B. Cohen and N. A. Smith. 2009. Shared logistic normal distributions for soft parameter tying in unsuper-vised grammar induction. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological).
9. J. DeNero and D. Klein. 2007. Tailoring word alignments to syntactic machine translation. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. D. Elworthy. 1994. Does Baum-Welch re-estimation help taggers? In Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. S. Goldwater and T. L. Griffiths. 2007. A fully Bayesian approach to unsupervised part-of-speech tagging. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. S. Goldwater, T. L. Griffiths, and M. Johnson. 2006. Contextual dependencies in unsupervised word segmentation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics/Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. A. Haghighi and D. Klein. 2006. Prototype-driven learning for sequence models. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. A. Haghighi, J. Blitzer, J. DeNero, and D. Klein. 2009. Better word alignments with supervised ITG models. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. M. Johnson and S. Goldwater. 2009. Improving non-parametric Bayesian inference: Experiments on unsu-pervised word segmentation with adaptor grammars. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. M. Johnson, T. L. Griffiths, and S. Goldwater. 2007. Adaptor grammars: a framework for specifying compositional nonparametric Bayesian models. In Neural Information Processing Systems.
17. M. Johnson. 2007. Why doesnt EM find good HMM POS-taggers? In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing/Computational Natural Language Learning.
18. D. Klein and C. D. Manning. 2004. Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. P. Liang and D. Klein. 2009. Online EM for unsuper-vised models. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. P. Liang, B. Taskar, and D. Klein. 2006. Alignment by agreement. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. D. C. Liu, J. Nocedal, and C. Dong. 1989. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming.
22. M. P. Marcus, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the penn treebank. Computational Linguistics.
23. B. Merialdo. 1994. Tagging English text with a probabilistic model. Computational Linguistics.
24. R. Neal and G. E. Hinton. 1998. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In Learning in Graphical Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. H. Ney and S. Vogel. 1996. HMM-based word alignment in statistical translation. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
26. F. J. Och and H. Ney. 2000. Improved statistical alignment models. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. R. Salakhutdinov, S. Roweis, and Z. Ghahramani. 2003. Optimization with EM and expectation-conjugate-gradient. In International Conference on Machine Learning.
28. N. A. Smith and J. Eisner. 2005. Contrastive estimation: Training log-linear models on unlabeled data. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
29. N. A. Smith and M. Johnson. 2007. Weighted and probabilistic context-free grammars are equally expressive. Computational Linguistics.
30. I. G. Varea, F. J. Och, H. Ney, and F. Casacuberta. 2002. Refined lexicon models for statistical machine translation using a maximum entropy approach. In Association for Computational Linguistics.
31. N. Xue, F-D Chiou, and M. Palmer. 2002. Building a large-scale annotated Chinese corpus. In International Conference on Computational Linguistics.