Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 865-877

  Fisher, Cynthia D ^a   To, March L ^a,b  

^a BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Daily diary; Daily process research; Ecological momentary assessment; Experience sampling methodology; Multilevel research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866439535     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.1803     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andrews, L., Russell-Bennett, R., & Drennan, J. (2011). Capturing affective experiences using the SMS experience sampling (SMSES) method. International Journal of Market Research, 53, 1-27.
2. Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2011). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 108-123). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3. Beal, D. J. (2011). Industrial/organizational psychology. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 601-619). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4. Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 440-464.
5. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2009). Tailor-made single-item measures of doubly concrete constructs. International Journal of Advertising, 28, 607-621.
6. Berkman, E. T., Dickenson, J., Falk, E. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). Using SMS text messaging to assess moderators of smoking reduction: Validating a new tool for ecological measurement of health behaviors. Health Psychology, 30, 186-194.
7. Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2009). Daily performance at work: Feeling recovered in the morning as a predictor of day-level job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 67-93.
8. Black, A.C., Harel, O., & Matthews, G. (2011). Techniques for analyzing intensive longitudinal data with missing values. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 339-356). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9. Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362-387.
10. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
11. Bolger, N., Stadler, G., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2011). Power analysis for intensive longitudinal studies. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 285-301). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Conner, T. S., & Lehman, B. J. (2011). Getting started: Launching a study in daily life. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 89-107). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13. Courvoisier, D. S., Eid, M. Lischetzke, T., & Schreiber, W. H. (2010). Psychometric properties of a computerized mobile phone method for assessing mood in daily life. Emotion, 10, 115-124.
14. Cranford, J. A., Shrout, P. E., Iida, M., Rafaeli, E., Yip, T., & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917-929.
15. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662-676.
16. Fisher, C. D. (2003). Why do lay people believe that satisfaction and performance are correlated? Possible sources of a commonsense theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 753-777.
17. Fisher, C. D. (2007). Experience sampling methodology in organisational psychology. In A. I. Glendon, B. M. Thompson, & B. Myors (Eds.), Advances in organisational psychology: An Asia-Pacific perspective (pp. 403-425). Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
18. Fleeson, W. (2007). Using experience sampling and multilevel modeling to study person-situation interactionist approaches to positive psychology. In A. D. Ong, & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 501-514). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as "good" as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I, 1409-1422.
20. Foo, M. D., Uy, M. A., & Baron, R. A. (2009). How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs' affect and venture effort. Journal of Applied Psychology, I, 1086-1094.
21. Grech, M. R., Neal, A., Yeo, G., Humphreys, M., & Smith, S. (2009). An examination of the relationship between workload and fatigue within and across consecutive days of work: Is the relationship static or dynamic? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 231-242.
22. Green, A. S., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., Reis, H. T., & Rafaeli, E. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11, 87-105.
23. Gunthert, K. C., & Wenze, S. J. (2011). Daily diary methods. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 144-159). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24. Hamaker, E. L. (2011). Why researchers should think "within-person." In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 43-61). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641.
27. van Hooff, M. L. M., Geurts, S. A. E., Kompier, M. A. J., & Taris, T. W. (2007). How fatigued do you currently feel? Convergent and discriminant validity of a single-item fatigue measure. Journal of Occupational Health, 49, 224-234.
28. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Hoboken: Routledge Academic.
29. Hurlburt, R. T. (2006). Exploring inner experience: The descriptive experience sampling method. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
30. Intille, S. S. (2007). Technological innovations enabling automatic, context-sensitive ecological momentary assessment. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture (pp. 308-337). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31. Judge, T. A., Woolf, E. F., & Hurst, C. (2009). Is emotional labor more difficult for some than for others? A multilevel, experience-sampling study. Personnel Psychology, 62, 57-88.
32. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33. Klumb, P., Elfering, A., & Herre, C. (2009). Ambulatory assessment in industrial/organizational psychology: Fruitful examples and methodological issues. European Psychologist, 14, 120-131.
34. Kubiak, T., & Krog, K. (2011). Computerized sampling of experience and behavior. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 124-143). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35. Kuppens, P., Oravecz, Z., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). Feeling change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1042-1060.
36. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
37. McCabe, K. O., Mack, L., & Fleeson, W. (2011). A guide for data cleaning in experience sampling studies. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 321-338). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38. Mehl, M. R., & Conner, T. A. (Eds.), (2011). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39. Mitchell, T. R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Cronk, R. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The "rosy view." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421-448.
40. Moskowitz, D.S., & Sadikaj, G. (2011). Event-contingent recording. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 160-175). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 880-893.
42. Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771-785.
43. Nezlek, J. B. (2011). Multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. London: Sage.
44. Ohly, S., Sonnentag, W., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79-93.
45. Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94-120.
46. Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., & Eagle, N. (2009). Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods and Research, 37, 426-454.
47. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
48. Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3-8.
49. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934-960.
50. Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347-367.
51. Schwartz, J. E., Neale, J., Marco, C., Shiffman, S. S., & Stone, A. A. (1999). Does trait coping exist? A momentary assessment approach to the evaluation of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 360-369.
52. Schwarz, N. (2011). Why researchers should think "real-time." In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22-42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53. Schwarz, N., Kahneman, D., & Xu, J. (2009). Global and episodic reports of hedonic experiences. In R. F. Belli, F. P. Stafford, & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and time diary methods in life course research (pp. 157-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Shiffman, S. (2007). Designing protocols for ecological momentary assessment. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A.A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture (pp. 27-53). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55. Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2011). Psychometrics. In M. R. Mehl, & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302-320). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
56. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Solhan, M. B., Trull, T. J., Jahng, S., & Wood, P. K. (2009). Clinical assessment of affective instability: Comparing EMA indices, questionnaire reports, and retrospective recall. Psychological Assessment, 21, 425-436.
58. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389-408.
59. Stone, A. A., & Broderick, J. E. (2009). Protocol compliance in real-time data collection studies. In R. F. Belli, F. P. Stafford, & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and time diary methods in life course research (pp. 243-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2002). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 236-243.
61. Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397-423.
62. Uy, M. A., Foo, M.-D., & Aguinis, H. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 31-54.
63. Wanous, J. P., Reicher, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
64. Warren, C.R., & Landis, R. S. (2007). One is the loneliest number: A meta-analytic investigation on single-item measures. Ergometrika, 4, 32-53.
65. West, S. G., & Hepworth, J. T. (1991). Statistical issues in the study of temporal data: Daily experiences. Journal of Personality, 59, 610-662.
66. Wilhelm, P., & Schoebi, D. (2007). Assessing mood in daily life: Structural validity, sensitivity to change, and reliability of a short-scale to measure three basic dimensions of mood. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 258-267.
67. Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695-719.