A hybrid and integrated approach to evaluate and prevent disasters

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1475-1489

  Ishizaka, Alessio ^a   Labib, Ashraf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

analytic hierarchy process; Bhopal gas disaster; crisis tree analysis; mathematical programming; risk management

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DISASTERS; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

BHOPAL GAS DISASTER; CRISIS TREE ANALYSIS; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING MODELS; OPTIMAL ALLOCATION; PROBLEM STRUCTURING; SAFETY INVESTMENTS;

DISASTER PREVENTION;

DISASTERS; FORESTRY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84906851718     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2013.59     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Ahmed R, Koo J, Jeong Y and Heo G (2011). Design of safetycritical systems using the complementarities of success and failure domains with a case study. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96(1): 201-209.
2. Ahn B and Choi S (2007). ERP system selection using a simulationbased AHP approach: A case of Korean homeshopping company. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59(3): 322-330. (Pubitemid 351334695)
3. Akarte M, Surendra N, Ravi B and Rangaraj N (2001). Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society 52(5): 511-522. (Pubitemid 34404700)
4. Apostolakis G and Lemon D (2005). A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Analysis 25(2): 361-376. (Pubitemid 40664364)
5. Aro P et al (1985). The Report of the ICFTU-ICEF Mission to Study the Causes and Effects of the Methyl Isocyanate Gas Leak at the Union Carbide Pesticide Plant in Bhopal. ICFTU-ICEF: Brussels/Geneva.
6. Banuelas R and Antony J (2006). Application of stochastic analytic hierarchy process within a domestic appliance manufacturer. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58(1): 29-38.
7. Bertolini M and Bevilacqua M (2006). A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91(7): 839-848.
8. Bogard W (1989). The Bhopal Tragedy: Language, Logic, and Politics in the Production of a Hazard. Westview Press: San Francisco, CA.
9. Cagno E, Caron F, Mancini M and Ruggeri F (2000). Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 67(3): 275-284. (Pubitemid 30555827)
10. Carnero C (2006). An evaluation system of the setting up of predictive maintenance programmes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91(8): 945-963.
11. Cassels J (1993). The Uncertain Promise of Law: Lessons from Bhopal. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.
12. Chen L and Cai J (2003). Using vector projection method to evaluate maintainability of mechanical system in design review. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 81(2): 147-154.
13. Chouhan T (2005). The unfolding of Bhopal disaster. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 18(4-6): 205-208. (Pubitemid 41360433)
14. Corporation R (2007). System Analysis Reference: Reliability, Availability and Optimization. ReliaSoft Publishing: Tucson, AZ.
15. Cox L (2002). Risk Analysis Foundations, Models, and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston/Dordrecht/London.
16. Elliott M (2010). Selecting numerical scales for pairwise comparisons. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 95(7): 750-763.
17. Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P and Veitch B (2009a). Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 87(5): 283-292.
18. Ferdous R, Khan F, Veitch B and Amyotte P (2009b). Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 87(4): 217-226.
19. Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P and Veitch B (2011). Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: Uncertainty handling formulations. Risk Analysis 31(1): 86-107.
20. Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P and Veitch B (2012). Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25(1): 8-19.
21. Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P and Veitch B (2013). Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: An innovative approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 91(1-2): 1-18.
22. Fukuyama H and Weber W (2002). Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53(9): 992-1003. (Pubitemid 34964225)
23. Gallucci R (2012). 'What-me worry? Why so serious?': A personal view on the Fukushima nuclear reactor accidents. Risk Analysis 32(9): 1444-1450.
24. Ghodsypour S and O'Brien C (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57: 199-212. (Pubitemid 128400944)
25. Gupta J (2002). The Bhopal gas tragedy: Could it have happened in a developed country? Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 15(1): 1-4. (Pubitemid 34060675)
26. Ha J and Seong P (2004). A method for risk-informed safety significance categorization using the analytic hierarchy process and Bayesian belief networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83(1): 1-15.
27. Ha J and Seong P (2009). A human-machine interface evaluation method: A difficulty evaluation method in information searching (DEMIS). Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94(10): 1557-1567.
28. Ho W and Emrouznejad A (2009). Multi-criteria logistics distribution network design using SAS/OR. Expert Systems with Applications 36(3, Part 2): 7288-7298.
29. Ho W, Lee C and Ho G (2010). Multiple criteria optimization of contemporary logistics distribution network problems. OR Insight 23(1): 27-43.
30. Ishizaka A and Labib A (2009). Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations. OR Insight 22(4): 201-220.
31. Ishizaka A, Balkenborg D and Kaplan T (2011). Does AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62(10): 1801-1812.
32. Joshua S and Garber N (1992). A causal analysis of large vehicle accidents through fault-tree analysis. Risk Analysis 12(2): 173-188.
33. Karydas D and Gifun J (2006). A method for the efficient prioritization of infrastructure renewal projects. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 91(1): 84-99. (Pubitemid 41277082)
34. Khakzad N, Khan F and Amyotte P (2011). Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96(8): 925-932.
35. Khakzad N, Khan F and Amyotte P (2012). Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 104: 36-44.
36. Khakzad N, Khan F and Amyotte P (2013a). Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 91(1-2): 46-53.
37. Khakzad N, Khan F and Amyotte P (2013b). Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 109(0): 5-17.
38. Kletz T (2001). Learing from Accidents. Gulf Professional Publishing: Oxford.
39. Kokangul A and Susuz Z (2009). Integrated analytical hierarch process and mathematical programming to supplier selection problem with quantity discount. Applied Mathematical Modelling 33(3): 1417-1429.
40. Lee C and Kwak N (1999). Information resource planning for a health-care system using an AHP-based goal programming method. Journal of the Operational Research Society 50(12): 1191-1198. (Pubitemid 32082824)
41. Lees F (1996). Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford.
42. Leung L, Lam K and Cao D (2005). Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process. Journal of the Operation Research Society 57(6): 682-691.
43. Li H, Apostolakis G, Gifun J, Van Schalkwyk W, Leite S and Barber D (2009). Ranking the risks from multiple hazards in a small community. Risk Analysis 29(3): 438-456.
44. Li X, Beullens P, Jones D and Tamiz M (2008). An integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in China. Journal of the Operation Research Society 60(3): 330-338.
45. Lindell M and Perry R (1990). Effects of the Chernobyl accident on public perceptions of nuclear plant accident risks. Risk Analysis 10(3): 393-399. (Pubitemid 20317406)
46. Linkov I et al (2006). Multicriteria decision analysis: A comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments. Risk Analysis 26(1): 61-78.
47. Lopez F et al (2010). A quality risk management model approach for cell therapy manufacturing. Risk Analysis 30(12): 1857-1871.
48. Mallor F, García-Olaverri C, Gómez-Elvira S and Mateo-Collazas P (2008). Expert judgment-based risk assessment using statistical scenario analysis: A case study-Running the bulls in Pamplona (Spain). Risk Analysis 28(4): 1003-1019.
49. Marseguerra M, Zio E and Librizzi M (2007). Human reliability analysis by fuzzy 'CREAM'. Risk Analysis 27(1): 137-154. (Pubitemid 46415542)
50. Martins M and Maturana M (2010). Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis 30(4): 674-698.
51. Millet I (1997). The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6(1): 41-51. (Pubitemid 127017245)
52. Mingers J, Liu W and Meng W (2007). Using SSM to structure the identification of inputs and outputs in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60(2): 168-179.
53. Özgen D, Önüt S, Gülsün B, Tuzkaya R and Tuzkaya G (2008). A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Information Sciences 178(2): 485-500. (Pubitemid 47600206)
54. Pareek K (1999). The managemnet did not adhere to safety norms. Interview. Down to Earth, 56.
55. Park K and Lee J (2008). A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP-SLIM. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93(4): 578-587. (Pubitemid 350245444)
56. Pastor-Ferrando J, Aragones-Beltran P, Hospitaler-Perez A and Garcia-Melon M (2010). An ANP- and AHP-based approach for weighting criteria in public works bidding. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61(6): 905-916.
57. Paté-Cornell E and Dillon R (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis for the NASA space shuttle: A brief history and current work. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 74(3): 345-352. (Pubitemid 33018675)
58. Paulos T and Apostolakis G (1998). A methodology to select a wire insulation for use in habitable spacecraft. Risk Analysis 18(4): 471-484.
59. Rathnayaka S, Khan F and Amyotte P (2011a). SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 89(3): 151-164.
60. Rathnayaka S, Khan F and Amyotte P (2011b). SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 89(2): 75-88.
61. Rathnayaka S, Khan F and Amyotte P (2012). Accident modeling approach for safety assessment in an LNG processing facility. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25(2): 414-423.
62. Saaty T (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3): 234-281.
63. Saaty T (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
64. Saaty T (1987). Risk-Its priority and probability: The analytic hierarchy process. Risk Analysis 7(2): 159-172. (Pubitemid 17117127)
65. Saaty T, Vargas L and Dellmann K (2003). The allocation of intangible resources: The analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37(3): 169-184. (Pubitemid 36685006)
66. Saaty T, Peniwati K and Shang J (2007). The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46(7-8): 1041-1053. (Pubitemid 47302237)
67. Saunders M, Lewis P and Thornhill A (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson: Harlow.
68. Sha D and Che Z (2005). Supply chain network design: Partner selection and production//distribution planning using a systematic model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(1): 52-62.
69. Shrivastava P (1987). Bhopal: Anatomy of Crisis. Ballinger Publishing Company: Cambridge.
70. Skogdalen J and Vinnem J (2012). Quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas drilling, using Deepwater Horizon as case study. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 100(0): 58-66.
71. Sorensen J (2002). Safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 76(2): 189-204. (Pubitemid 34524753)
72. Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J and Wilcox C (2009). Uses and misuses of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Risk Analysis 29(1): 26-33.
73. Stone D, Lynch S and Pandullo R (1995). Flares. [online], available: http://www.gasflare.org/pdf/Flare-Type.pdf, accessed 8 May 2013.
74. Taghipour S, Banjevic D and Jardine A (2011). Prioritization of medical equipment for maintenance decisions. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62(9): 1666-1687.
75. Tavana M (2005). A priority assessment multi-criteria decision model for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(10): 1197-1215.
76. Thekdi S and Lambert J (2011). Decision analysis and risk models for land development affecting infrastructure systems. Risk Analysis 32(7): 1253-1269.
77. Ting S-C and Cho D (2008). An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13(2): 116.
78. Todinov M (2006). Reliability analysis based on the losses from failures. Risk Analysis 26(2): 311-335.
79. Varma D and Mulay S (2009). Methyl isocyanate: The Bhopal gas. In: Gupta R (ed) Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents. Elsevier: New York, pp 293-312.
80. Varma R and Varma D (2005). The Bhopal disaster of 1984. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 25(1): 37-45. (Pubitemid 41647737)
81. Vuilleumier F, Weatherill A and Crausaz B (2002). Safety aspects of railway and road tunnel: Example of the Lötschberg railway tunnel and Mont-Blanc road tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 17(2): 153-158.
82. Weir D (1987). The Bhopal Syndrome. Earthscan publications Limited: London.
83. Wheeler S (2005). An analysis of combined arms teaming for the Australian defence force. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(11): 1279-1288.
84. Xiao W, Liu Z, Jiang M and Shi Y (1998). Multiobjective linear programming model on injection oilfield recovery system. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 36(5): 127-135. (Pubitemid 128387164)
85. Yang Z, Wang J, Bonsall S and Fang Q (2009). Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Analysis 29(1): 95-120.
86. Yeo G, Song D, Dinwoodie J and Roe M (2009). Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61(8): 1249-1257.
87. Youngblood R (1998). Applying risk models to formulation of safety cases. Risk Analysis 18(4): 433-444.
88. Zio E, Baraldi P and Popescu I (2008). A fuzzy decision tree for fault classification. Risk Analysis 28(1): 49-67. (Pubitemid 351315502)