Supply chain network design: Partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic model

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 52-62

  Sha, D Y ^a   Che, Z H ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b MING CHI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Partner selection; Production distribution planning; Supply chain network

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; PRODUCTION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CUSTOMER DEMANDS; SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORK;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 30744456799     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601949     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Meade L, Liles D and Sarkis J (1997). Justifying strategic alliances and partnering: a prerequisite for virtual enterprising. Omega-Int JMngt Sci 25: 29-42.
2. Jagdev H and Browne J (1998). The extended enterprise - a context for manufacturing. Prod Plan Control 9: 216-229.
3. Talluri S, Baker R and Sarkis J (1999). A framework for designing efficient value chain networks. Int J Prod Econ 62: 133-144.
4. Papazoglou M, Ribbers P and Tsalgatidou A (2000). Integrated value chains and their applications from a business and technology standpoint. Decic Support Syst 29: 323-342.
5. Mikhailov L (2002). Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega - Int J Mngt Sci 30: 393-401.
6. Sha DY and Che ZH (2005). Virtual integration with a multicriteria partner selection model for the multi-echelon manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 25: 793-802.
7. Korhonen P, Huttunen K. and Eloranta E (1998). Demand chain management in global enterprise-information management view. Prod Plan Control 9: 526-531.
8. Davis M and O'Sullivan D (1999). Systems design framework for the extended enterprise. Prod Plan Control 10: 3-18.
9. Talluri S and Baker R (1996). Quantitative framework for designing efficient business process alliances. Proceedings of 1996 International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management Piscataway, pp 656-661.
10. Weber CA and Desai A (1996). Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. Eur J Opl Res 90: 142-155.
11. Wang D, Ip WH and Yung KL (2001). A heuristic genetic algorithm for subcontractor selection in a global manufacturing environment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 31: 189-198.
12. Muralidharan C, Anatharaman N and Deshmukh SG (2002). A multi-criteria group decision making model for supplier rating. J Supply Chain Mngt 3: 22-33.
13. Gen M and Cheng R (1997). Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design. Wiley: New York.
14. Holland JH (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor.
15. Saaty TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
16. Saaty TL (1983). Priority setting in complex problems. IEEE Trans Eng Mngt 30: 140-155.
17. Dyer RF and Forman EH (1992). Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Support Syst 8: 99-124.
18. Korpela J, Lehmusvaara A and Tuominen M (1999). An integrated approach for truck carrier selection. Int J Logistic 2: 5-20.
19. Al-Harbi KMAS (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. Int J Proj Mngt 19: 19-27.
20. Lai VS, Wong BK and Cheung W (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in software selection. Eur J Opl Res 187: 134-144.
21. Muralidhar K, Santhanam R and Wilson RL (1990). Using the analytic hierarchy process for information system project selection. Inform Mngt 18: 87-95.
22. Keeney RL and Raiffa H (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley: New York.
23. Suslick SB and Furtado R (2001). Quantifying the value of technological, environmental and financial gain in decision models for offshore oil exploration. J Petrol Sci Eng 32:115-125.
24. Walls MR (1995). Corporate risk tolerance and capital allocation: a practical approach to implementing an exploration risk policy. J Petrol Tech 47: 307-311.
25. Walls MR and Dyer JS (1996). Risk propensity and firm performance: a study of the petroleum exploration industry. Mngt Sci 42: 1004-1021.
26. Kutnar J and Sheblé G (1997). A decision analysis approach to the transaction selection problem in a competitive electric market. Electr Pow Syst Res 38: 209-216.
27. Nepomuceno F, Suslick SB and Walls MR (1999). Investment and technology decision model in offshore oil exploration in Brazil: a decision analysis using multi-attribute utility theory. Nat Resour Res, JIntMath Geol 8: 193-203.