Expert judgment-based risk assessment using statistical scenario analysis: A case study - Running the bulls in Pamplona (Spain)

Risk Analysis

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1003-1019

  Mallor, Fermín ^a   García Olaverri, Carmen ^a   Gómez Elvira, Sagrario ^a   Mateo Collazas, Pedro ^b  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Expert judgment; Multivariate analysis; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISKS; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY ENGINEERING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ASSESSMENT MODELS; CASE STUDIES; EXPERT JUDGMENT; HIGH-QUALITY; HISTORICAL DATA; MATHEMATICAL PROCEDURES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODELLING;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

CATTLE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISK; INJURY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVEY;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PUBLISHING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK-TAKING; RUNNING; SPAIN; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NAVARRA; PAMPLONA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

ELAGATIS;

EID: 48349095573     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01098.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arnell, N. W., Tompkings, E. L., & Adger, W. N. (2005). Eliciting information from experts on the likelihood of rapid climate change. Risk Analysis, 25 (6 1419 1431.
2. Claycamp, H. G. (2006). Rapid benefit-risk assessments: No escape from expert judgments in risk management. Risk Analysis, 26 (1 147 156.
3. O'Hagan, A., Buck, C. E., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J., Garthwaite, P., Jenkinson, D., Oakley, E., & Rakow, T. (2006). Uncertain Judgements Eliciting Experts' Probabilities. Chichester, UK : Wiley.
4. Cooke, R. M. (1991). Experts in Uncertainty, Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. New York : Oxford University Press.
5. Cooke, R. M., & Goossens, L. H. J. (2000). A procedure guide for structured expert judgement (Report EUR 18820, Brussels-Luxembourg).
6. Cooke, R. M., & Goossens, L. H. J. (2004). Expert judgement elicitation for risk assessments of critical infrastructures. Journal of Risk Research, 7 (6 643 656.
7. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127 152.
8. Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20 (1 1 11.
9. Hemmingway, E. (1926). Fiesta/The Sun Also Rises. New York : Charles Scribner's Sons.
10. Pamplona City Council. Available at http://www.pamplona.net/VerPag.asp? IdPag=763&Idioma=5.
11. Sanfermin.com web 2007). Avialable at http://www.sanfermin.com/2006/guia. php?lang=eng.
12. Sanfermin.com web 2007). Encierrometro 2006. : Available at http://www.sanfermin.com/encierrometro/index.php?lang=en.
13. Jeff Wu, C. F., & Hamada, M. (2000). Experiments. Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. New York : Wiley.
14. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63 (2 81 97.
15. Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA : RWS Publications.
16. Saaty, T. L. (2000). Decision Making for Leaders. Pittsburgh, PA : RWS Publications.
17. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124 1131.