Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1820-1833

  Ding, Ying ^a   Zhang, Guo ^a   Chambers, Tamy ^a   Song, Min ^b   Wang, Xiaolong ^c   Zhai, Chengxiang ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

CITATION ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL CAPABILITY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; METHODICAL APPROACH; RESEARCH OUTPUTS; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; SEMANTIC LEVELS; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84906830324     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23256     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abu-Jbara, A., & Radev, D.R. (2011). Coherent citation-based summarization of scientific papers. In 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings (pp. 500-509
2. Angrosh, M.A., Cranefield, S., & Stanger, N. (2010). Context identification of sentences in related work sections using a conditional random field: Towards intelligent digital libraries. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL'10 (pp. 293-302
3. Arnold, A., & Cohen, W.W. (2009). Information extraction as link prediction: Using curated citation networks to improve gene detection. In B. Liu, A. Bestavros, D.-Z. Du, & J. Wang (Eds.), Wireless algorithms, systems, and applications. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, WASA 2009 (pp. 541-550). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
4. Athar, A. (2011). Sentiment analysis of citations suing sentence structurebased features. In Proceedings of the 2011 Student Session, ACL-HLT (pp. 81-87). Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectural enqiry and the culture of disciplines. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 208-216. (Pubitemid 13590734)
7. Borgman, C.L. (1990). Scholarly communications and bibliometrics. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Bradshaw, S. (2003). Reference directed indexing: Redeeming releVance for subject search in citation indexes. In T. Koch & I.T. Sølvberg (Eds.), Research and adVanced technology for digital libraries. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference, ECDL 2003 (pp. 499-510). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. (Pubitemid 37053182)
9. Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(4), 223-229.
10. Byrnes, J.E., Baskerville, E., Caron, B., Neylon, C., Tenopir, C., Schildhauer, M., Budden, A., Aarssen, L., & Lortie, C.J.. (2013). The four pillars of scholarly publishing: The future and a foundation. Peer- JPrePrints No.e11v1.
11. Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(4), 284-290.
12. Chang, J., & Blei, D.M. (2009). Relational topic models for document networks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS). Volume 5 of JMLR: W&CP 5. (pp. 81-88
13. Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S.D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441.
14. Cronin, B. (1981). The need for a theory of citing. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 16-24.
15. Cronin, B. (1984). Citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
16. Cronin, B. (2005). The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
17. Dietz, L., Bickel, S.S., & Scheffer, T. (2007). Unsupervised prediction of citation influences. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '07 (pp. 233-240
18. Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583-592.
19. Ding, Y., Song, M., Han, J., Yu, Q., Yan, E., Lin, L., & Chambers, T. (2013). Entitymetrics: Measuring the impact of entities. PLoS ONE, 8(8), 1-14.
20. Dong, C., & Schäfer, U. (2011). Ensemble-style self-training on citation classification. In 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP 2011 (pp. 623-631
21. Elkiss, A., Shen, S., Fader, A., Erkan, G., States, D., & Radev, D. (2008). Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 51-62.
22. Frost, C.O. (1979). The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 49(4), 399-414.
23. Fujii, A. (2007). Enhancing patent retrieval by citation analysis. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '07 (pp. 793-794 (Pubitemid 350165073)
24. Garfield, E. (1964). Can citation indexing be automated? In M.E. Stevens, V.E. Giuliano, & L.B. Heilprin (Eds.), Statistical association methods for merchanized documentation. Symposium Proceedings Washington 1964 (pp. 189-192). Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards.
25. Garfield, E. (1974). The citation index as a subject index. In Essays of an information scientist. Volume 2, 1974-1975 (pp. 62-64). Wilmington, DE: ISI Press.
26. Garzone, M.A. (1997). Automated classification of citations using linguistic semantic grammars. The University of Western Ontario.
27. Gilbert, G.N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122.
28. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29. Glenisson, P., Glänzel,W., Janssens, F., & Moor, B. (2005). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1548-1572. (Pubitemid 41050724)
30. He, Q., Kifer, D., Pei, J., Mitra, P., & Giles, C.L. (2011). Citation recommendation without author supervision. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM '11 (pp. 755-764
31. He, Q., Pei, J., Kifer, D., Mitra, P., & Giles, C.L. (2010). Context-aware citation recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW '10 (pp. 421-430
32. Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 29(6), 308-310.
33. Hjørland, B., & Kyllesbech Nielsen, L. (2001). Subject access points in electronic retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 249-298.
34. Hodges, T.L. (1972). Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographical control. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35. Huang, W., Kataria, S., Caragea, C., Mitra, P., Giles, C.L., & Rokach, L. (2012). Recommending citations: Translating papers into references. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM'12 (pp. 1910-1914
36. Jenssen, T.-K., Laegreid, A., Komorowski, J., & Hovig, E. (2001). A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nature Genetics, 28, 21-28. (Pubitemid 32405811)
37. Kataria, S., Mitra, P., Caragea, C., & Giles, C.L. (2011). Context sensitive topic models for author influence in document networks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Volume Three, IJCAI '11 (pp. 2274-2280
38. Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J., & Chen, F. (1995). A trainable document summarizer. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '95 (pp. 68-73
39. Lipetz, B.-A. (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 16(2), 81-90.
40. Liu, Y., Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Gryc, W. (2009). Topic-link LDA: Joint models of topic and author community. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '09 (pp. 665-672
41. Maričić, S., Spaventi, J., Pavičić, L., & Pifat-Mrzljak, G. (1998). Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(6), 530-540. (Pubitemid 128569289)
42. Marsh, E.E., & White, M.D. (2003). A taxonomy of relationships between images and text. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 647-672. (Pubitemid 37424596)
43. McCain, K.W., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17(1-2), 127-163.
44. Mei, Q., & Zhai, C. (2008). Generating impact-based summaries for scientific literature. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) with the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT) of the North American Chapter of the ACL (pp. 816-824
45. Meij, E., & Rijke, M. de. (2007). Using prior information derived from citations in literature search. In RIAO '07 Large Scale Semantic Access to Content (Text, Image, Video, and Sound) Proceedings (pp. 665-670
46. Merton, R.K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635-659.
47. Mohammad, S., Dorr, B., Egan, M., Hassan, A., Muthukrishan, P., Qazvinian, V., . . . Zajic, D. (2009). Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms. In Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings (pp. 584-592).
48. Mons, B., Van Haagen, V., Chilchester, C., Hoen, P.B., den Dunnen, J.T., Van Ommen, G., . . . Schultes, E. (2011). The value of data. Nature Genetics, 43, 281-283.
49. Moravcsik, M.J., &Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
50. Nallapati, R.M., Ahmed, A., Xing, E.P., & Cohen,W.W. (2008). Joint latent topic models for text and citations. In 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '08 (pp. 542-550
51. Nanba, H., Kando, N., & Okumura, M. (2000). Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: Towards automatic review article generation. AdVances in Classification Research Online, 11(1), 117-134.
52. Nanba, H., & Okumura, M. (1999). Towards multi-paper summarization reference information. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI '99 (pp. 926-931
53. Nanba, H., & Okumura, M. (2004). Comparison of some automatic and manual methods for summary evaluation based on the text summarization challenge 2. In LREC: 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
54. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 609-641.
55. O'Connor, J. (1982). Citing statements: Computer recognition and use to improve retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 18(3), 125-131.
56. Oppenheim, C., & Renn, S.P. (1978). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 29(5), 225-231. (Pubitemid 9401795)
57. Peritz, B.C. (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5(5), 303-312.
58. Pettigrew, K.E., & McKechnie, L.E.F. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 62-73. (Pubitemid 32133551)
59. Pham, S.B., & Hoffmann, A. (2003). A new approach for scientific citation classification using cue phrases. In T.D. Gedeon & L.C.C. Fung (Eds.), AI 2003 adVances in artificial intelligence. (pp. 759-771). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. (Pubitemid 37525073)
60. Qazvinian, V., Hassanabadi, L.S., & Halavati, R. (2008). Summarizing text with a genetic algorithm-based sentence extraction. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 2(4), 426-444.
61. Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D.R. (2008). Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In COLING '08 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1 (pp. 689-696). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
62. Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D.R. (2010). Identifying non-explicit citing sentences for citation-based summarization. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.555-564
63. Ramakrishnan, C., Patnia, A., Hovy, E., & Burns, G.A. (2012). Layoutaware text extraction from full-text PDF of scientific articles. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 7(7), 1-10.
64. Rees-Potter, L.K. (1989). Dynamic thesaural systems: A bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems. Information Processing & Management, 25(6), 677-689.
65. Ritchie, A., Robertson, S., & Teufel, S. (2008). Comparing citation contexts for information retrieval. In 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Proceedings (pp. 213-222
66. Ritchie, A., Teufel, S., & Robertson, S. (2006). How to find better index terms through citations. In Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? CLIIR '06 Proceedings (pp. 25-32). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
67. Schlitt, T., Palin, K., Rung, J., Dietmann, S., Lappe, M., Ukkonen, E., & Brazma, A. (2003). From gene networks to gene function. Genome Research, 13, 2568-2576. (Pubitemid 37541145)
68. Schneider, J.W. (2006). Concept symbols revisited: Naming clusters by parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts of concept symbols. Scientometrics, 68(3), 573-593. (Pubitemid 44127042)
69. Schneider, J.W., & Borlund, P. (2004). Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: Methodical considerations. Journal of Documentation, 60(5), 524-549. (Pubitemid 39532712)
70. Shadish,W.R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S.K. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498.
71. Siddharthan, A., & Teufel, S. (2007). Whose idea was this, and why does it matter? Attributing scientific work to citations. In NAACL HLT 2007 Proceedings (pp. 316-323
72. Small, H.G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327-340.
73. Small, H.G. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (vol. 3, pp. 287-310). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74. Small, H.G. (2011). Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments:Apreliminary investigation. Scientometrics, 87(2), 373-388.
75. Snizek, W.E., Oehler, K., & Mullins, N.C. (1991). Textual and nontextual characteristics of scientific papers: Neglected science indicators. Scientometrics, 20(1), 25-35.
76. Spiegel-Rösing, I. (1977). Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 97-113. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/28463
77. Stansbury, M.C. (2002). Problem statements in seven LIS journals: An application of the Hernon/Metoyer-Duran attributes. Library & Inforamtion Science Research, 24(2), 157-168.
78. Suppe, F. (1998). The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381-405. Retrieved from (Pubitemid 128461348)
79. Tang, J., & Zhang, J. (2009). A discriminative approach to topic-based citation recommendation. In T. Theeramunkong, B. Kijsirikul, N. Cercone, & T.-B. Ho (Eds.), AdVances in knowledge discovery and data mining. (pp. 572-579). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
80. Teufel, S. (2000). Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh.
81. Teufel, S., & Moens, M. (2002). Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with releVance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4), 409-445.
82. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006a). An annotation scheme for citation function. In 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, sigDAIL '09, Proceedings (pp. 80-87). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
83. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006b). Automatic classification of citation function. In 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, sigDAIL '09, Proceedings (pp. 80-87). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
84. Vinkler, P. (1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 47-72.
85. Voos, H., & Dagaev, K.S. (1976). Are all citations equal? Or, did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(6), 19-21.
86. White, M.D., & Iivonen, M. (2001). Questions as a factor in web search strategy. Information Processing & Management, 37(5), 721-740. (Pubitemid 32529418)
87. White, M.D., & Marsh, E.E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-4.
88. Zhang, G., Ding, Y., & Milojević, S. (2013). Citation content analysis (CCA): A method for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1490-1503.
89. Ziman, J.M. (1968). Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.