Context identification of sentences in related work sections using a conditional random field: Towards intelligent digital libraries

Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 293-302

  Angrosh, M A ^a   Cranefield, Stephen ^a   Stanger, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Citation classification; Conditional random fields; Sentence classification

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; CONTEXT IDENTIFICATION; DATA SETS; INTELLIGENT INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; TECHNICAL WRITING;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 77955098289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1816123.1816168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Buckingham Shum, S. J., Uren, V., Li, G., Sereno, B. and Mancini, C. 2007. Modeling naturalistic argumentation in research literatures: Representation and interaction design issues. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22 (1), 17-48.
2. Borgman, C. L. and Furner, J. 1990. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Sage Newbury Park, CA.
3. Luukkonen, T. 1992. Is scientists' publishing behaviour reward seeking? Scientometrics, 24 (2), 297-319.
4. Ziman, J. M. 1968. Public knowledge: an essay concerning the social dimension of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Bonzi, S. 2007. Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 33 (4), 208-216.
6. Weinstock, M. 1971. Citation indexes. In Encyclopedia of library and information science, 5, Dekker, New York, 16-40.
7. Moravcsik, M. J. and Murugesan, P. 1975. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5 (1), 86-92.
8. Nanba, H. and Okumura, M. 1999. Towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. In 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 926-931.
9. Teufel, S., Carletta, J. and Moens, M. 1999. An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. In 9th European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, 110-117.
10. Teufel, S. and Moens, M. 2000. What's yours and what's mine: determining intellectual attribution in scientific text. In. 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in NLP, 2000, Association for Computational Linguistics, 9-17.
11. Garzone, M. and Mercer, R. E. 2000. Towards an automated citation classifier. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1822 (2000), Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 337-346.
12. Mercer, R. E. and Di Marco, C. 2000. The importance of fine-grained cue phrases in scientific citations. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2671 (2003), Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 550-556.
13. Le, M., Ho, T. B. and Nakamori, Y. 2006. Detecting citation types using finite-state machines. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3918 (2006), Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 265-274.
14. Swales, J. 1986. Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1), 39-56.
15. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. and Tidhar, D. 2006. An annotation scheme for citation function. In 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Sydney, Australia, 80-87.
16. Mao, Y. and Lebanon, G. 2009. Generalized Isotonic Conditional Random Fields. Machine Learning, 77(2-3), 225-248.
17. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A. and Pereira, F. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 282-289.
18. McCallum, A. and Li, W. 2003. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proceedings of 7th Conference on Natural Language Learning at HTL-NAACL 2003. Association for Computational Linguistics, 188-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/ 1119176.1119206
19. Pinto, D., McCallum, A., Wei, X. and Croft, W. B. 2003. Table extraction using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research, Digital Government Society of North America, 1-4.
20. Sha, F. and Pereira, F. 2003. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. In Proceedings of Human Language Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL) 2003, 134-141.
21. McCallum, A., Freitag, D. and Pereira, F. 2000. Maximum entropy Markov models for information extraction and segmentation. In 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 591-598.
22. Majeed, A., Razak, S., Abu-Ghazaleh, N.B. and Harras, H.A. 2009. TCP over Multi-Hop Wireless Networks: The impact of MAC level interactions. In Ad-Hoc Mobile and Wireless Networks: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5793 (2009), Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1-15.
23. Natural Language Toolkit - NLTK. http://www.nltk.org/
24. NLTK - Punkt Sentence Tokenizer http://nltk.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/ api/nltk.tokenize.punkt.PunktSentenceTokenizer-class.html
25. Springerlink.com http://www.springerlink.com
26. McCallum, A.K. 2002. MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.