Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1490-1503

  Zhang, Guo ^a   Ding, Ying ^a   Milojevic̈, Staša ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

citation analysis; content analysis; scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

CITATION ANALYSIS; CODEBOOKS; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CRITICAL DISCUSSIONS; LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SYNTACTICS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84878605479     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22850     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Anders, S., &, Huber, W., (2010). Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biology, 11 (10), R106.
2. Bauer, M., (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In, M. Bauer, &, G. Gaskell, (eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 131-151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bacon, D.F., Chen, Y.L., Kash, L.A., Parkes, D C., Rao, M., &, Sridharan, M., (2012). Predicting your own effort. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (pp. 695-702). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
4. Bennett, P.D., (1995). Dictionary of marketing terms. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
5. Bell, P., (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In, T. van Leeuwen, &, C. Jewitt, (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10-34). London, England: Sage.
6. Berelson, B., (1952). Content analysis in communications research. New York: Free Press.
7. Berg, J., Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., &, Rietz, T., (2008). Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 742-751.
8. Bonzi, S., (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predicators of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33 (4), 208-216.
9. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Neuhaus, C., &, Daniel, H-D., (2008). Citation counts for research evaluation: Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8, 93-102.
10. Börner, K., Boyack, K.W., Milojevic̈, S., &, Morris, S., (2012). An introduction to modeling science: Basic model types, key definitions, and a general framework for the comparison of process models. In, A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner, P.V.D. Besselaar, (Eds.), Models of science dynamics-Encounters between complexity theory and information (pp. 3-22). London, England: Springer
11. Braam, R., Moed, H., &, Van Raan, A., (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (4), 252-266.
12. Brown, L.D., &, Gardner, J.C., (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR). Journal of Accounting Research, 23 (1), 84-109.
13. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., &, Laville, F., (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22 (1), 155-205.
14. Cartwright, D.P., (1953). Analysis of qualitative material. In, L. Festigner, &, D. Katz, (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences (pp. 421-470). Beverly, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.
15. Chen, C., (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of American Society of Information Science, 57 (3), 359-377.
16. Chen, C.M., &, Hicks, D., (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59 (2), 199-211.
17. Chen, C.M., &, Yu, Y., (2000). Empirical studies of information visualization: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 851-866
18. Chen, Y.L., &, Kash, I.A., (2011). Information elicitation for decision making. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 175-182). Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
19. Chen, Y.L., Gao, X.A., Goldstein, R., &, Kash, I.A., (2011). Market manipulation with outside incentives. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 614-619). Palo Alto: CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
20. Chubin, D.E., &, Moitra, S.D., (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-441.
21. Coleman, J.S., (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
22. Cronin, B., (1981). The need for a theory of citing. Journal of Documentation, 37 (1), 16-24
23. Cronin, B., (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London, England: Taylor Graham.
24. Cronin, B., (2004). Normative shaping of scientific practice: The magic of Merton. Scientometrics, 60 (1), 41-46.
25. de Groot, A.D., (1961). Methodologie; grondslagen van onderzoek en denken in degedragswetenschappen [Methodology: Foundations of research in behavioral sciences]. Gravenhage, The Netherlands: Mouton.
26. Duncan, E.B., Anderson, F.D., &, McAleese, R., (1981, April). Qualified citation indexing: Its relevance to educational technology. Paper presented at the Education Technology International Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland.
27. Fisher, R.A., (1959). Statistical methods & scientific inference. New York: Hafner Publishing.
28. Frost, C., (1979). The use of citations in literary research: Preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly, 49 (4), 399-414.
29. Fudenberg, D., &, Tirole, J., (1991). Perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory, 53 (2), 236-260.
30. Garfield, E., (1977). The citation index as a subject index. Essays of an Information Scientist, 2, 62-64.
31. Glaser, B.G., &, Strauss, A.L., (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
32. Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., &, De Moor, B., (2005). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41 (6), 1548-1572.
33. Gilbert, G.N., (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7 (1), 113-122.
34. Gilbert, G.N., &, Woolgar, S., (1974). The quantitative study of science: An examination of the literature. Science Studies, 4, 279-294.
35. Goel, S., Reeves, D.M., Watts, D.J., &, Pennock, D.M., (2010). Prediction without markets. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 357-366). ACM.
36. Hellqvist, B., (2010). Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (2), 310-318.
37. Herlach, G., (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (6), 308-310.
38. Hjørland, B., (2009). Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (8), 1519-1536.
39. Hjørland, B., (2000). Relevance research: The missing perspective(s): "Non-relevance" and "epistemological relevance." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2), 209-211.
40. Hjørland, B., (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 53 (4), 257-270.
41. Hjørland, B., &, Albrechtsen, H., (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (6), 400-425.
42. Hodges, T., (1978). Citation indexing: Its potential for bibliographic control (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
43. Holsti, O.R., (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
44. Kaplan, N., (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16 (3), 179-184.
45. Kress, G., &, van Leeuwen, T., (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, England: Routledge.
46. Krippendorff, K., (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Latour, B., &, Woolgar, S., (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Lipetz, B.A., (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation, 16 (2), 81-90.
49. Marsh, E.E., &, White, M.D., (2003). A taxonomy of relationships between images and text. Journal of Documentation, 59 (6), 647-672.
50. Markoff, J., Shapiro, G., &, Weitman, S.R., (1975). Toward the integration of content analysis and general methodology. Sociological Methodology, 6, 1-58.
51. Mayr, E., (1997). This is biology: The science of the living world. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
52. McCain, K.W., &, Turner, K., (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometics, 17 (1-2), 127-163.
53. Merton, R.K., (1973). The normative structure of science. In, R.K. Merton, (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54. Milojevic̈, S., (2012). How are academic age, productivity and collaboration related to citing behavior of researchers? PLoS One, 7 (11), e49176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049176.
55. Moravcsik, M.J., &, Murugesan, P., (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
56. Nicolaisen, J., (2007) Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41 (1), 609-641.
57. Oppenheim, C., &, Renn, S.P., (1978). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 (5), 225-231.
58. Othman, A., &, Sandholm, T., (2010). Decision rules and decision markets. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 625-632), Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
59. Oxford English Dictionary. (1989). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Peritz, B.C., (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5, 303-312.
61. Pettigrew, K., &, McKechnie, L., (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for information Science & Technology, 52 (1), 62-73.
62. Pew Research. (1998). Online newcomers more middlebrow, less work-oriented: The Internet news audience goes ordinary. The Pew Research Center For the People & the Press. Retrieved from http://www.peoplepress.org./ tech98sum.htm
63. Pinski, G., &, Narin, F., (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory with applications to literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12 (5), 297-312.
64. Portes, A., (1998). Social Capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
65. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., &, Neylon, C., (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto (v.1.0). Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
66. Priss, U., (2006). Formal concept analysis in information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 521-543. Retrieved from http://www.upriss.org.uk/papers/arist.pdf
67. Putnam, D.R., (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), 65-78.
68. Putnam, D.R., (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
69. Raghavan, P., (2004). Social networks and the Web. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3034, 1-1.
70. Small, H., (1976). Structural dynamics of scientific literature. International Classification, 3 (2), 67-74.
71. Small, H., (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
72. Small, H., (1982). Citation context analysis. In, B. J. Dervin, &, M. J. Voight, (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences (pp. 287-310). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
73. Small, H., (2011). Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation. Scientometrics, 87, 373-388.
74. Small, H., &, Klavans, R., (2011). Identifying scientific breakthroughs by combining co-citation analysis and citation context. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics & Informetrics (pp. 783-793). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics & Informetrics.
75. Spiegel-Rosing, I., (1977). Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7 (1), 97-113.
76. Stansbury, M.C., (2002). Problem statements in seven LIS journals: An application of the Hernon/Metoyer-Duran attributes. Library & Information Science Research, 24 (2), 157-168.
77. Stone, P.J., Dunphy, D.C., Smith, M.S., &, Oqilvie, D.M., (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Oxford, England: MIT Press.
78. Spence, A.M., (1973). Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87 (3), 355-374.
79. Swales, J., (1986). Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1), 39-56.
80. Tang, J., Wang, B., Yang, Y., Hu, P., Zhao, Y.T., Yan, X.Y.,., Usadi, A.K., (2012). PatentMiner: Topic-driven patent analysis and mining. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'2012). New York: ACM Press.
81. Tang, J., Wu, S., Sun, J.M., &, Su, H., (2012). Cross-domain collaboration recommendation. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'2012). New York: ACM Press.
82. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., &, Tidhar, D., (2006, July). Automatic classification of citation function. Paper presented at the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP06), Sydney, Australia.
83. Voos, H., &, Dagaev, K.S., (1976). Are all citations equal? Or did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1, 20-21.
84. Wacker, J.G., (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 361-385.
85. Whewell, W., (2010). History of the inductive sciences. Charleston, SC: Nabu Press. (Original work published 1837)
86. White, H.D., (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25 (1), 89-116.
87. White, M.D., &, March, E.E., (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55 (1), 22-45.
88. White, M.D., &, Iivonen, M., (2001). Questions as a factor in web search strategy. Information Processing & Management, 37, 721-740.
89. Wolfers, J., &, Zitzewitz, E., (2004). Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspective, 18 (2), 107-126.
90. Yang, X.C., Purdy, M., Marzluff, W.F., &, Dominski, Z., (2006). Characterization of 3′ hExo, a 3′ exonuclease specifically interacting with the 3′ end of histone mRNA. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281 (41), 30447-30454.