The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 583-592

  Ding, Ying ^a   Liu, Xiaozhong ^a   Guo, Chun ^a   Cronin, Blaise ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation; Citation analysis; Content based citation analysis; Mentioning

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES; CITATION; CITATION ANALYSIS; CITATION NETWORKS; DIFFERENTIAL CONTRIBUTION; JOURNAL ARTICLES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MENTIONING;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84876703034     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries 2007, 68(5):314-316.
2. Blei D., Ng A.Y., Jordan M.I. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2003, 3:993-1022.
3. Bollen J., Rodriguez M.A., Van de Sompel H. Journal status scientometrics 2006, 69(3):669-687.
4. Bonzi S. Characteristics of a literature as predicators of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1982, 33(4):208-216.
5. Chubin D.E., Moitra S.D. Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting?. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5:423-441.
6. Cronin B. Agreement and divergence on referencing practice. Journal of Information Science 1981, 3:27-33.
7. Cronin B. The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication 1984, Taylor Graham, London.
8. Cronin B. Normative shaping of scientific practice: the magic of Merton. Scientometrics 2004, 60(1):41-46.
9. Ding Y. Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(2):236-245.
10. Finney, B. (1979). The reference characteristics of scientific texts. London: City University, Centre for Information Science (M.Sc. dissertation).
11. Frost C. The use of citations in literary research: Preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly 1979, 49(4):399-414.
12. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972, 178(60):471-479.
13. Garfield E. The citation index as a subject index. Essays of an Information Scientist 1977, 2:62-64.
14. Glenisson P., Glänzel W., Janssens F., De Moor B. Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management 2005, 41(6):1548-1572.
15. Herlach G. Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1978, 29(6):308-310.
16. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
17. Lipetz B.A. Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation 1965, 16(2):81-90.
18. MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. Problems of citation analysis: A problem of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(1):1-12.
19. McCain K., Turner K. Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics 1989, 17(1-2):127-163.
20. Moravcsik M.J., Murugesan P. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5:86-92.
21. Oppenheim C., Renn S.P. Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1978, 29(5):225-231.
22. Peritz B.C. A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics 1983, 5:303-312.
23. Pinski G., Narin F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory with applications to literature of physics. Information Processing & Management 1976.
24. Small H. Structural dynamics of scientific literature. International Classification 1976, 3(2):67-74.
25. Small H. Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science 1978, 8:327-340.
26. Small H. Citation context analysis. Progress in communication sciences 1982, 3:287-310. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
27. Small H. The significance of bibliographic references. Scientometrics 1987, 12(5-6):339-341.
28. Small H. Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation. Scientometrics 2011, 87:373-388.
29. Small, H. (2011b). Text mining of citations for emerging scientific communities. Talk presented at Mapping and Measuring Scientific Output, Los Alamos National Laboratory, May 11. Available online at: http://mediazone.brighttalk.com/comm/ReedElsevier/78d7d945a8-24781-4950-26860.
30. Spiegel-Rosing I. Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7(1):97-113.
31. Suppe F. The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science 1998, 65(3):381-405.
32. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP06), Sydney, Australia, July 22-23, 2006.
33. Voos H., Dagaev K.S. Are all citations equal? Or Did we op. cit. your idem?. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1976, 1:20-21.
34. Vinkler P. A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics 1987, 12(1-2):47-72.
35. White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In: Borgman, C. L. (Ed.). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 84-106.