Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation

Scientometrics

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 373-388

  Small, Henry ^a,b  

^a THOMSON REUTERS   (United Kingdom)

^b SciTech Strategies Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation contexts; Corpus linguistics; Maps of science; Sentiment analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953275099     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0349-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Argamon, S., Dodick, J., & Chase, P. (2008). Language use reflects scientific methodology: A corpus-based study of peer-reviewed journal articles. Scientometrics, 75(2), 203-238.
2. Börner, K., Chen, C. M., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
3. Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310-331.
4. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61(7), 1386-1409.
5. Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-441.
6. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scale disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220.
7. Cozzens, S. E. (1985). Comparing the sciences: Citation context analysis of papers from neurophramacology and the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 15(1), 127-153.
8. Finney, B. (1979). The reference characteristics of scientific texts. Unpublished Master's Thesis. The City University of London.
9. Hargens, L. L. (2000). Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 846-865.
10. Harwood, N. (2009). An interview based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 497-518.
11. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
12. Khan, K., Baharudin, B. B., Khan, A. & Faxal-e-Malik. (2009). Mining opinion from text documents: a survey. In 2009 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (pp. 194-199). New York: IEEE.
13. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(3), 455-476.
14. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The road since structure, Chap. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
17. Losee, J. (1972). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. London: Oxford University Press.
18. Moravcsik, M., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
19. Paquot, M., & Bestgen, Y. (2009). Distinctive words in academic writing: A comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction. Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, 68, 247-269.
20. Schneider, J. W. (2006). Concept symbols revisited: Naming clusters by parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts of concept symbols. Scientometrics, 68(3), 573-593.
21. Scott, M. (2010). WordSmith Tools Step by Step. http://www. lexically. org/wordsmith/step_by_step_guide_English. pdf.
22. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 237-340.
23. Small, H. (1986). Synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 97-110.
24. Small, H. (2010). Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: Co-citation contexts and the role of analogy. Scientometrics, 83, 835-849.
25. Small, H., & Upham, P. (2009). Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application. Scientometrics, 79(2), 365-375.
26. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genera analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Teufel, S. (2010). The structure of scientific articles: Applications to citation indexing and summarization. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
28. Verlic, M., Stiglic, G., Kocbek, S. & Kokol, P. (2008). Sentiment in science: a case study of CBMS contributions in years 2003 to 2007. In: 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer Based Medical Systems (pp. 138-143). New York: IEEE.