Divergence with gene flow within the recent chipmunk radiation (Tamias)

Heredity

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 185-194

  Sullivan, J ^a,b   Demboski, J R ^c   Bell, K C ^d   Hird, S ^e   Sarver, B ^a,b   Reid, N ^e   Good, J M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action   (United States)

^c DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^e LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SCIURIDAE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SCIURIDAE;

EID: 84906085011     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.27     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Baker RJ, Bradley LC, Dragoo JW, Engstrom MD, Hoffman RS, Jones CA et al. (2003). Revised checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico. Occas Pap Mus Texas Tech Univ 229: 1-24.
2. Beerli P (2009). How to use MIGRATE, or why are Markov chain Monte Carlo programs difficult to use? In: Bertoelle G, Bruford MW, Hauffe HC, Rizzoli A, Versesi C (eds). Population Genetics for Animal Conservation, vol. 17 of Conservation Biology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, pp 42-79.
3. Bergeron P, Montiglio P-O, Réale D, Humphries MM, Garant D (2012). Bateman gradients in a promiscuous mating system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66: 1125-1130.
4. Bergstrom BJ, Hoffmann RS (1991). Distribution and diagnosis of three species of chipmunks (Tamias) in the Front Range of Colorado. Southwest Nat 36: 14-28.
5. Bergstrom BJ (1992). Parapatry and competition between chipmunk (Tamias) species and the hypothesized role of parasitism. Am Midl Nat 128: 168-179.
6. Best TL (1993). Tamias ruficaudus. Mamm Species 452: 1-7.
7. Best TL, Granai NJ (1994a). Tamias obscurus. Mamm Species 472: 1-6.
8. Best TL, Granai NJ (1994b). Tamias merriami. Mamm Species 476: 1-9.
9. Best TL, Clawson RG, Clawson JA (1994a). Tamias panamintinus. Mamm Species 468: 1-7.
10. Best TL, Clawson RG, Clawson JA (1994b). Tamias speciosus. Mamm Species 478: 1-9.
11. Bi K, Linderoth T, Vanderpool D, Good JM, Nielsen R, Moritz C (2013). Unlocking the vault: next-generation museum population genomics. Mol Ecol 22: 6018-6032.
12. Bi K, Vanderpool D, Singhal S, Linderoth T, Moritz C, Good JM (2012). Transcriptome-based exon capture enables highly cost-effective comparative genomic data collection at moderate evolutionary scales. BMC Genomics 13: 403-403.
13. Blankenship DJ (1985). Reproductive isolating mechanisms of southern California chipmunks: a systematic evaluation of Tamias obscurus Allen, 1890 and T. merriami Allen, 1890 (Rodentia: Sciuridae). PhD dissert, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA, pp 137.
14. Brown JH (1971). Mechanisms of competitive exclusion between two species of chipmunks. Ecology 52: 305-311.
15. Callahan JR (1977). Diagnosis of Eutamias obscurus (Rodentia: Sciuridae). J Mammal 58: 188-201.
16. Callahan JR (1981). Vocal solicitation and parental investment in female Eutamias. Am Nat 118: 872-875.
17. Chappell MA (1978). Behavioral factors in the altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (Eutamias). Ecology 59: 565-579.
18. Compton SB, Callahan JR (1995). Reproductive behavior in Merriam's chipmunk (Tamias merriami). Great Basin Nat 55: 89-91.
19. Currat M, Ruedi M, Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2008). The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 62: 1908-1920.
20. Dalquest WW, Baskin JA, Schultz GE (1996). Fossil mammals from a late Miocene (Clarendonian) site in Beaver County, Oklahoma. In: Genoways HH, Baker RJ (eds). Contribution in Mammalogy. A Memorial Volume Honoring Dr. J. Konx Jones, Jr. Museum of Texas Tech University: Lubbock, TX, USA, pp 107-137.
21. Daubenmire R (1975). Floristic Plant Geography of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho. Brigham Young University Press: Provo, UT, USA.
22. Demboski JR, Sullivan J (2003). Extensive mtDNA variation within the yellow-pine chipmunk, Tamias amoenus (Rodentia: Sciuridae), and phylogeographic inferences for northwest North America. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26: 389-408.
23. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambeaut A (2012). Bayesian phylogenetic with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1969-1973.
24. Ellis LS, Maxson LR (1979). Evolution of the chipmunk genera Eutmias and Tamias. J Mammal 60: 331-334.
25. Fitzpatrick BM, Turelli M (2006). The geography of mammalian speciation: mixed signals from phylogenies and range maps. Evolution 60: 601-615.
26. Feder JL, Nosil P (2010). The efficacy of divergence hitchhiking in generating genomic islands during ecological speciation. Evolution 64: 1729-1747.
27. Gambs RD (1965). Zoogeography of Chipmunks in the Pacific Northwest. MS Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA, p 109.
28. Gannon WL, Lawlor TE (1989). Variation of the chip vocalization of three species of Townsend chipmunks (genus Eutamias). J Mammal 70: 740-753.
29. Good J (2011). Reduced representation methods for subgenomic enrichment and next-generation sequencing. In: Orgogozo V, Rockman MV (eds). Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 772. Humana Press: New York, NY, USA. pp 85-103.
30. Good JM, Sullivan J (2001). Phylogeography of red-tailed chipmunks (Tamias ruficaudus), a northern Rocky Mountains endemic. Mol Ecol 10: 2683-2696.
31. Good JM, Demboski JR, Nagorsen DM, Sullivan J (2003). Phylogeography and introgres-sive hybridization: chipmunks (Tamias) in the northern Rocky Mountains. Evolution 57: 1900-1916.
32. Good J, Hird S, Reid N, Demboski J, Steppan SJ, Sullivan J. (2008). Ancient introgression and mtDNA capture in non-sister species of chipmunks (Tamias). Mol Ecol 17: 1313-1327.
33. Grinnell J, Storer TI (1924). Animal Life in the Yosemite. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.
34. Hall ER (1981). The Mammals of North America, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA.
35. Heled J, Drumond AJ (2010). Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol 27: 570-580.
36. Heller HC (1970). Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (Eutamias): interspecific aggression, water balance, and energy budgets. PhD Thesis, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
37. Heller HC (1971). Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (Eutamias): interspecific aggression. Ecology 52: 312-319.
38. Heller HC, Gates DM (1971). Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (Eutamias): energy budgets. Ecology 52: 424-433.
39. Hird S, Sullivan J (2009). Assessment of gene flow across a hybrid zone in red-tailed chipmunks (Tamias ruficaudus). Mol Ecol 18: 3097-3109.
40. Hird S, Reid N, Demboski JR, Sullivan J (2010). Introgression at differentially aged hybrid zones in red-tailed chipmunks. Genetica 138: 869-883.
41. Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2004). Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 87-93.
42. Howell AH (1929). Revision of the American chipmunks (genera Tamias and Eutamias). North Am. Fauna 52: 1-157.
43. Jameson EW (1999). Host-ectoparasite relationships among North American chipmunks. Acta Theriol 44: 225-231.
44. Jiggins CD (2008). Sympatric speciation: why the controversy? Curr Biol 16: R333-R334.
45. Johnson DH (1943). Systematic review of the chipmunks (genus Eutamias) of California. Univ Calif Publ Zool 48: 63-148.
46. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SWY, Guindon S (2012). PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1695-1701.
47. Levenson H, Hoffmann RS, Nadler CF, Deutsch L, Freeman SD. (1985). Systematics of the Holarctic chipmunks (Tamias). J Mammal 66: 219-242.
48. Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Brown JH (2006). Biogeography, 3rd edn Sinauer Associates-Sunderland, MA, USA, p 752.
49. Mack RN, Rutter NM, Bryant VM Jr, Valastro S (1978). Reexamination of postglacial vegetation history in northern Idaho: Hager Pond, Bonner Co. Quat Res 10: 241-255.
50. Melo-Ferriera J, Boursot P, Carneiro M, Esteves PJ, Farelo L, Alves PJ (2012). Recurrent introgression of mitochondrial DNA among hares (Lepus spp.) revealed by species-tree inference and coalescent simulations. Syst Biol 61: 367-381.
51. Merriam CH (1897). Notes on the chipmunks of the genus Eutamias occurring west of the east base of the Cascade-Sierra system, with descriptions of new forms. Proc Biol Soc Wash 11: 189-212.
52. Minin V, Abdo Z, Joyce P, Sullivan J (2003). Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst Biol 52: 674-683.
53. Noor MAF, Bennett SA (2009). Island of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of reduced recombination in maintaining species. Heredity 103: 439-444.
54. Nosil P, Feder JL (2012). Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367: 332-342.
55. Patterson BD, Heaney LR (1987). Preliminary analysis of geographic variation in red-tailed chipmunks (Eutamias ruficaudus). J Mammal 68: 782-791.
56. Patterson BD, Thaeler CS (1982). The mammalian baculum: hypotheses on the nature of bacular variability. J Mammal 63: 1-15.
57. Pecoud J, Ollivier A, Plantegenest M, Simon J-C (2009). A continuum of genetic divergence from sympatric host races to species in the pea aphid complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 7495-7500.
58. Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2009). Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 386-393.
59. Piaggio AJ, Spicer GS (2000). Molecular phylogeny of the chipmunk genus Tamias based on the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit II gene. J Mammal Evol 7: 147-166.
60. Piaggio AJ, Spicer GS (2001). Molecular phylogeny of the chipmunks inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase II gene sequences. Mol Phylo-genet Evol 20: 335-350.
61. Pinho C, Hey J (2010). Divergence with gene flow: models and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41: 215-230.
62. Ramm SA (2007). Sexual selection and genital evolution in mammals: a phylogenetic analysis of baculum length. Am Nat 169: 360-369.
63. Reid N, Hird S, Schulte-Hostedde A, Sullivan J (2010). Examination of nuclear loci across a zone of mitochondrial introgression between Tamias ruficaudus and T. amoenus. J Mammal 91: 1389-1400.
64. Reid N, Demboski JR, Sullivan J (2012). Phylogeny estimation of the radiation western American chipmunk (Tamias) in the face of introgression using reproductive protein genes. Syst Biol 61: 44-62.
65. Rice WR, Hostert EE (1993). Laboratory studies on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years. Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
66. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003). Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
67. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS (2004). Intraspecific variation of testis size and sperm length in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus): implications for sperm competition and reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55: 272-277.
68. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS, Gibbs HL (2004). Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behav Ecol 15: 351-356.
69. Smadja CM, Butlin RK (2010). A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow. Mol Ecol 20: 5123-5140.
70. Strasburg JL, Rieseberg LH (2010). How robust are "isolation with migration" analyses to violations of the IM model? A simulation study. Mol Biol Evol 27: 297-310.
71. Sullivan RM, Petersen KE (1988). Systematics of southwestern populations of least chipmunks (Tamias minimus) reexamined: a synthetic approach. Occ Pap Mus Southwestern Biol 5: 1-27.
72. Sutton DA (1992). Tamias amoenus. Mamm Species 390: 1-8.
73. Sutton DA, Patterson BD (2000). Geographic variation of the western chipmunks Tamias senex and T. siskiyou, with two new subspecies from California. J Mammal 81: 316.
74. Taylor EB, Boughman JW, Groenenboom M, Sniatynski M, Schluter D, Gow JL (2006). Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Mol Ecol 15: 343-355.
75. Toews DPL, Brelsford A (2012). The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol Ecol 21: 3907-3930.
76. Verts BJ, Carraway LN (2001). Tamias minimus. Mamm Species 653: 1-10.
77. White JA (1953). The baculum in the chipmunks of western North America. Univ Kansas Pub Mus Nat Hist 5: 611-631.
78. Wu CI (2001). The genic view of the process of speciation. J Evol Biol 14: 851-865.
79. Zink RMR, Barrowclough GFG (2008). Mitochondrial DNA under siege in avian phylogeo-graphy. Mol Ecol 17: 2107-2121.
80. Zitari A, Scopece G, Helal AN, Widmer A, Cozzolino S (2012). Is floral divergence sufficient to maintain species boundaries upon secondary contact in Mediterranean food-deceptive orchids? Heredity 108: 219-228.