Bateman gradients in a promiscuous mating system

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1125-1130

  Bergeron, Patrick ^a   Montiglio, Pierre Olivier ^b   Réale, Denis ^b   Humphries, Murray M ^c   Garant, Dany ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mammals; Mating system; Opportunity for selection; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

BREEDING SEASON; FITNESS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; RODENT; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION; WILD POPULATION;

MAMMALIA; TAMIAS; TAMIAS STRIATUS;

EID: 84864338953     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1364-x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anthes N, David P, Auld JR, Hoffer JNA, Jarne P, Koene JM, Kokko H, Lorenzi MC, Péssié B, Sprenger D, Staikou A, Schärer L (2010) Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: an extended approach to quantify sexual selection. Am Nat 176: 249-263.
2. Arnold SJ (1994) Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am Nat 144: S126-S149.
3. Arnold SJ, Duvall D (1994) Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am Nat 143: 317-348.
4. Barreto FS, Avise JC (2010) Quantitative measures of sexual selection reveal no evidence for sex-role reversal in a sea spider with prolonged paternal care. Proc R Soc Lond B 277: 2951-2956.
5. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368.
6. Bergeron P, Réale D, Humphries MM, Garant D (2011) Evidence of multiple paternity and mate selection for inbreeding avoidance in wild eastern chipmunks. J Evol Biol 24: 1684-1695.
7. Calsbeek R, Bonneaud C, Prabhu S, Manoukis N, Smith TB (2007) Multiple paternity and sperm storage lead to increased genetic diversity in Anolis lizards. Evol Ecol Res 9: 495-503.
8. Fitze PS, Le Galliard J-F (2011) Inconsistency between different measures of sexual selection. Am Nat 178: 256-268.
9. Gopurenko D, Williams RN, DeWoody JA (2007) Reproductive and mating success in the small-mouthed salamander (Ambystoma texanum) estimated via microsatellite parentage analysis. Evol Biol 34: 130-139.
10. Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75: 21-64.
11. Jennions MD, Kokko H, Klug H (2012) The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection. J Evol Biol 25: 591-598.
12. Jones AG (2009) On the opportunity for sexual selection, the bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63: 1673-1684.
13. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Arnold SJ, Avise JC (2000) The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 677-680.
14. Jones AG, Arguello JR, Arnold SJ (2002) Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 2533-2539.
15. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106.
16. Klemme I, Ylonen H, Eccard JA (2007) Reproductive success of male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus): the effect of operational sex ratio and body size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61: 1911-1918.
17. Klug H, Heuschele J, Jennions MD, Kokko H (2010) The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J Evol Biol 23: 447-462.
18. Knight J (2002) Sexual stereotypes. Nature 415: 254-256.
19. Krakauer AH, Webster MS, Duval EH, Jones AG, Shuster SM (2011) The opportunity of sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood. J Evol Biol 24: 2064-2071.
20. Levitan DR (2005) The distribution of male and female reproductive success in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Int Comput Biol 45: 848-855.
21. Levitan DR (2008) Gamete traits influence the variance in reproductive success, the intensity of sexual selection, and the outcome of sexual conflict among congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 62: 1305-1316.
22. Mills SC, Grapputo A, Koskela E, Mappes T (2007) Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proc R Soc Lond B 274: 143-150.
23. Munroe KE, Koprowski JL (2011) Sociality, Bateman's gradients, and the polygynandrous genetic mating system of round-tailed ground squirrels (Xerospermophilus tereticaudus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65: 1811-1824.
24. Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Wilson K (2001) Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409: 681-682.
25. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS, Gibbs HL (2004) Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Behav Ecol 15: 351-356.
26. Shuster SM (2009) Sexual selection and mating systems. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106(Suppl 1): 10009-10016.
27. Snyder BF, Gowaty PA (2007) A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61: 2457-2468.
28. Vanpé C, Kjellander P, Galan M, Cosson J-F, Aulagnier S, Liberg O, Hewinson AJM (2008) Mating system, sexual dimorphism, and the opportunity for sexual selection in a territorial ungulate. Behav Ecol 19: 309-316.
29. While GM, Uller T, Wapstra E (2011) Variation in social organization influences the opportunity for sexual selection in a social lizard. Mol Ecol 20: 844-852.
30. Wolff JO, Macdonald DW (2004) Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 127-134.