Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization

Journal of Communication

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 702-722

  Lee, Jae Kook ^a   Choi, Jihyang ^a   Kim, Cheonsoo ^a   Kim, Yonghwan ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905577810     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12077     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542-555. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080493.
2. Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, Chicago, IL. 10.1145/1134271.1134277
3. Aiello, L. M., Barrat, A., Schifanella, R., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., & Menczer, F. (2012). Friendship prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(2), 1-33. doi:10.1145/2180861.2180866.
4. Bimber, B. (2004). The internet and political fragmentation. Paper presented at the Democracy in the 21st Century Conference, Urbana-Champagne, IL.
5. Binder, A. R., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). The soul of a polarized democracy. Communication Research, 36(3), 315-340. doi:10.1177/0093650209333023.
6. Bisgin, H., Agarwal, N., & Xiaowei, X. (2010). Investigating homophily in online social networks. Paper presented at 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference, Toronto, Canada.
7. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
8. Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering "difference" in the contemporary public sphere. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680-700. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x.
9. Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Paper presented at the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Menlo Park, CA.
10. Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630.
11. DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American's social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690-755. doi:10.1086/230995.
12. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568-584. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568.
13. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5-24.
14. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
15. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Fiorina, M., & Abrams, S. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 563-588. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836.
17. Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x.
18. Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. (2011). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004-2008. Political Behavior, 35(1), 113-134. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6.
19. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799-1839. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr044.
20. Guerin, B., & Innes, J. M. (1989). Cognitive tuning sets: Anticipating the consequences of communication. Current Psychology, 8(3), 234-249. doi:10.1007/bf02686752.
21. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, H., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
24. Hampton, K. N., Lee, C. J., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1031-1049. doi:10.1177/1461444810390342.
25. Hardy, B. W., & Scheufele, D. A. (2005). Examining differential gains from Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 71-84. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02659.x.
26. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65-95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x.
27. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. The American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197-1216.
28. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19-39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x.
30. Kim, Y. M. (2009). Issue publics in the new information environment. Communication Research, 36(2), 254-284. doi:10.1177/0093650208330253.
31. Kim, Y. (2011). The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 971-977. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001.
32. Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498-516. doi:10.1111/jcom.12034.
33. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York, NY: Free Press.
34. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 628-642. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x.
35. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426-448. doi:10.1177/0093650209333030.
36. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349-368. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x.
37. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC. 10.1145/1772690.1772751
38. Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics. Communication Research, 32(1), 87-111. doi:10.1177/0093650204271400.
39. Liptak, A. (2012, November). The vanishing battleground. The New York Times, SR1.
40. Little, R. J. A. (1992). Regression with missing X's: A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 1227-1237. doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10476282.
41. McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N.-J. (2012). Social networks, public discussion and civic engagement: A socialization perspective. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 197-208). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
42. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., ... Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26(6), 743-774.
43. Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27-51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x.
44. Munro, G. D., & Ditto, P. H. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 636-653. doi:10.1177/0146167297236007.
45. Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111-126. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004264.
46. Mutz, D. C., & Martin, P. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97-114.
47. Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140-155. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00376.x.
48. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
49. Nie, N. H., Miller, D. W., III, Golde, S., Butler, D. M., & Winneg, K. (2010). The World Wide Web and the U.S. political news market. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 428-439. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00439.x.
50. Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422-442. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh069.
51. Nivola, P. S., & Brady, D. W. (2006). Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52. Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27.
53. Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0003.
54. Parsons, B. (2010). Social networks and the affective impact of political disagreement. Political Behavior, 32(2), 181-204. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9100-6.
55. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36(4), 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.
56. Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95-112. doi:10.1080/105846002317246506.
57. Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361. doi:10.1177/0270467610380009.
58. Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Social networking sites and politics. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/̃/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SNS_and_politics.pdf
59. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432. doi:10.1023/A:1024232915870.
60. Scheufele, D. A. (2001). Democracy for some? How political talk both informs and polarizes the electorate. In R. P. Hart & D. Shaw (Eds.), Communication and U.S. elections: New agendas (pp. 19-32). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
61. Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728-753. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x.
62. Stroud, N. J. (2007). Media effects, selective exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11. Political Communication, 24(4), 415-432. doi:10.1080/10584600701641565.
63. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341-366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9.
64. Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556-576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x.
65. Sunstein, C. R. (2000). Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes. The Yale Law Journal, 110(1), 71-119. doi:10.2307/797587.
66. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.
68. Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299-314. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01635.x.
69. Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163-184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037.
70. Van Alstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2005). Global village or cyber-Balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Science, 51(6), 851-868. doi:10.2307/20110380.
71. Wojcieszak, M. (2010). 'Don't talk to me': Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12(4), 637-655. doi:10.1177/1461444809342775.
72. Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40-56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x.
73. Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the divide or intensifying the conflict? How disagreement affects strong predilections about sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 31(3), 315-339. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x.
74. Wojcieszak, M., & Rojas, H. (2011). Correlates of party, ideology and issue based extremity in an era of egocentric publics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 488-507. doi:10.1177/1940161211418226.
75. Ziemke, D. A. (1980). Selective exposure in a presidential campaign contingent on certainty and salience. Communication Yearbook, 4, 497-511.