'Don't talk to me': Effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism

New Media and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 637-655

  Wojcieszak, Magdalena ^a  

^a IE UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cross cutting exposure; Extremism; Heterogeneity; Internet; Online groups; Polarization; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953728421     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444809342775     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aiken, L. and S. West (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage.
2. Arendt, H. (1968) Truth and Politics, in H. Arendt (ed.) Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, pp. 227-64. New York: Viking Press.
3. Berelson, B., P. Lazarsfeld and W. McPhee (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Boase, J., J.B. Horrigan, B. Wellman and L. Rainie (2006) The Strength of Ties, Pew Internet & American Life Project, URL (consulted November 2007): http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_internet_ties.pdf.
5. Chadwick, A. (2006) Internet Politics: States, Citizens and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Deutsch, M. and H.B. Gerard (1955) A Study of Normative and Informational Influences upon Individual Judgment, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3): 629-36.
7. Eveland, W.P. (2004) The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation and Elaboration, Political Communication 21(2): 177-94.
8. Eveland, W.P. and D. Scheufele (2000) Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation, Political Communication 17(3): 215-37.
9. Feldman, L. and V. Price (2008) Confusion or Enlightenment? How Exposure to Disagreement Moderates the Effects of Political Discussion and Media Use on Candidate Knowledge, Communication Research 35(1): 61-87.
10. Finifter, A.W. (1974) The Friendship Group as a Protective Environment for Political Deviants, American Political Science Review 68(2): 607-25.
11. Garrett, R.K. (2006) Protest in an Information Society: A Review of Literature on Social Movements and New ICTs, Information, Communication & Society 9(2): 202-24.
12. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-80.
13. Hardy, B.W. and D.A. Scheufele (2005) Examining Differential Gains from Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions, Journal of Communication 55(1): 71-84.
14. Hill, K.A. and J.E. Hughes (1997) Computer-mediated Political Communication: The USENET and Political Communities, Political Communication 14(1): 3-27.
15. Huckfeldt, R. and J. Sprague (1988) Choice, Social Structure and Political Information: The Informational Coercion of Minorities, American Journal of Political Science 32(2): 467-82.
16. Huckfeldt, R. and J. Sprague (1995) Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Hyman, H. and E. Singer (eds) (1968) Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research. New York: Free Press.
18. Kunda, Z. (1990) The Case for Motivated Reasoning, Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480-98.
19. Lavine, H. (2001) The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence Toward Presidential Candidates, American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 915-29.
20. Lee, E. (2006) When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-mediated Communication?, Communication Research 33(6): 423-47.
21. Lenart, S. (1994) Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Liebes, T. and R. Ribak (1992) The Contribution of Family Culture to Political Participation, Political Outlook and its Reproduction, Communication Research 19(5): 618-41.
23. Lord, C., M. Ross and M. Lepper (1979) Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(11): 2098-109.
24. McGuire, W.J. (1964) Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches, in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 191-229. New York: Academic Press.
25. McKenna, K.Y.A. and J.A. Bargh (1998) Coming Out in an Age of the Internet: Identity Demarginalization through Virtual Group Participation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(3): 681-94.
26. Meffert, M.F., S. Chung, A.J. Joiner, L. Waks and J. Garst (2006) The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing during a Political Campaign, Journal of Communication 56(1): 27-51.
27. Moscovici, S. and M. Zavalloni (1969) The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12(2): 125-35.
28. Munro, G.D. and P.H. Ditto (1997) Biased Assimilation, Attitude Polarization and Affect in Reactions to Stereotype-relevant Scientific Information, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(6): 636-53.
29. Mutz, D. (2002a) Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice, American Political Science Review 96(2): 111-26.
30. Mutz, D. (2002b) The Consequences of Cross-cutting Networks for Political Participation, American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 838-55.
31. Mutz, D. (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mutz, D.C. and J.J. Mondak (2006) The Workplace as a Context for Cross-cutting Political Discourse, Journal of Politics 68(1): 140-55.
33. Myers, D.G. (1975) Discussion Induced Attitude Polarization, Human Relations 28(8): 699-714.
34. Nickerson, R.S. (1998) Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises, Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175-220.
35. Nir, L. (2005) Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(4): 422-42.
36. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion - Our Social Skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Norris, P. (2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Paccagnella, L. (1997) Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 3(1), URL (consulted April 2007): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html.
39. Page, B.I. (1996) Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40. Papacharissi, Z. (2002) The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere, New Media & Society 4(1): 9-27.
41. Petty, R.E. and J.T. Cacioppo (1990) Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition versus Integration, Psychological Bulletin 107(3): 367-74.
42. Postmes, T., T. Spears and M. Lea (1998) Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? SIDE-effects of Computer Mediated Communication, Communication Research 25(6): 689-715.
43. Price, V., J.N. Cappella and L. Nir (2002) Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? Political Communication 19(1): 97-114.
44. Price, V., L. Nir and J.N. Cappella (2006) Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions, Communication Theory 16(1): 47-75.
45. Scheufele, D.A. (2002) Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and Their Implication for Participatory Behavior, Communication Research 29(1): 46-65.
46. Shah, D.V., N.R. Kwak and L. Holbert (2001) Connecting and Disconnecting with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital, Political Communication 18(2): 141-62.
47. Sniderman, P. (1981) A Question of Loyalty. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Southern Poverty Law Center (1999) Hate on the Net: Intelligence Report, Winter, URL (consulted October 2005): http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=363.
49. Southern Poverty Law Center (2009) Hate Group Numbers Up by 54% Since 2000, URL (consulted April 2009): http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=366.
50. Spears, R., M. Lea and S. Lee (1990) De-individuation and Group Polarization in Computer-mediated Communication, British Journal of Social Psychology 29(2): 121-34.
51. Steiner, I. (1966) Personality and the Resolution of Interpersonal Disagreements, in B.A. Maher (ed.) Progress in Experimental Personality Research, pp. 195-239. New York: Academic Press.
52. Sunstein, C. (2001) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Turner, J.C. (1991) Social Influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
54. Van Alstyne, M. and E. Brynjolfsson (1997) 'Electronic Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans?', URL (consulted October 2004): http://web.mit.edu/marshall/www./papers/CyberBalkans.pdf.
55. Wojcieszak, M. (2008) False Consensus Goes Online: Impact of Ideologically Homogeneous Groups on False Consensus, Public Opinion Quarterly 72(4): 781-91.
56. Wojcieszak, M. (in press)Carrying Online Participation Offline: Mobilization by Radical Online Groups and Politically Dissimilar Offline Ties, Journal of Communication.
57. Wojcieszak, M. and D. Mutz (2009) 'Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?', Journal of Communication 59(1): 40-56.