How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings

New Media and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1031-1049

  Hampton, Keith N ^a   Lee, Chul Joo ^b   Her, Eun Ja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

civic engagement; community; echo chamber; pervasive awareness; social isolation; social support

Indexed keywords

EID: 81055143832     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444810390342     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adamic LA,Glance N.The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery; 2005; 2005.
2. Bauman ZLiquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000:.
3. Burt RStructural Holes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1992:.
4. Campbell HExploring Religious Community Online. New York: Peter Lang; 2005:.
5. Campbell SW,Kwak N.Mobile communication and civic life.Journal of Communication. 2010;60 (3): 536-555.
6. Castells MThe Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell; 1996:.
7. Cohen S,Doyle WJ,Skoner DP,Rabin BS,Gwaltney JM.Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997;277 (24): 1940-1944.
8. Coleman JS.Social capital in the creation of human capital.American Journal of Sociology. 1988;44 (Supplement): S95-S120.
9. Coser LAThe Idea of Social Structure. Coser LA, ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1975:88-102.
10. Delli Carpini MX,Cook FL,Jacobs LR.Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement.Annual Review of Political Science. 2004;7 (1): 315-344.
11. Durkheim EThe Division of Labor in Society. 1893) The Division of Labor in Society (1993 edition). New York: MacMillan.New York: MacMillan; 1893:.
12. Ellison CG,George LK.Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a Southeastern community.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1994;33 (1): 46-61.
13. Erickson B.Culture, class, and connections.American Journal of Sociology. 1996;102 (1): 217-251.
14. Erickson BHCreation and Returns of Social Capital. Flap HDVölker B, ed. New York: Routledge; 2004:27-50.
15. Feld S.The focused organization of social ties.American Journal of Sociology. 1981;86 (5): 1015-1035.
16. Fischer CAmerica Calling. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992:.
17. Gergen KJHandbook of Mobile Communication Studies. Katz JE, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:297-310.
18. Glanville JL.Voluntary associations and social network structure.Sociological Forum. 2004;19 (3): 465-491.
19. Granovetter M.The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology. 1973;78 (6): 1360-1380.
20. Granovetter MGetting a Job. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1974:.
21. Guest AM,Wierzbicki SK.Social ties at the neighborhood level.Urban Affairs Review. 1999;35 (1): 92-111.
22. Hagan J,MacMillan R,Wheaton B.New kid in town.American Sociological Review. 1996;61:368-385.
23. Hampton KN.Neighborhoods in the network society: The e-neighbors study.Information, Communication and Society. 2007;10 (5): 714-748.
24. Hampton KN.Internet use and the concentration of disadvantage.American Behavioral Scientist. 2010;53 (8): 1111-1132.
25. Hampton KN,Wellman B.Neighboring in Netville: How the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb.City and Community. 2003;2 (3): 277-311.
26. Hampton KN,Sessions LF,Her EJ,Rainie LSocial Isolation and New Technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009:.
27. Hampton KN,Livio O,Goulet LS.The social life of wireless urban spaces: Internet use, social networks, and the public realm.Journal of Communication. 2010;60 (4): 701-722.
28. Humphreys L.Cellphones in public.New Media & Society. 2005;7 (6): 810-833.
29. Kalmijn M.Shared friendship networks and the life course.Social Networks. 2003;25 (3): 231-249.
30. Kendall LHanging Out in the Virtual Pub. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002:.
31. KimHKimG JParkH WRiceR E (2007) Configurations of relationships in different media. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication12(4). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/kim.html (consulted October 2010).
32. Klein HK.Tocqueville in cyberspace.The Information Society. 1999;15 (4): 213-220.
33. Social Capital: An International Research Program. Lin NErickson BH, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008:.
34. Ling RSNew Tech, New Ties. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2008:.
35. Lofland LThe Public Realm. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1998:.
36. Magee MSocial Capital. Lin NErickson BH, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008:308-327.
37. MarlowC (2005) The Structural Determinants of Media Contagion. Unpublished thesis (Doctoral dissertation), MIT.
38. McPherson M,Smith-Lovin L,Cook JM.Birds of a feather.Annual Review of Sociology. 2001;27:415-444.
39. McPherson M,Smith-Lovin L,Brashears ME.Social isolation in America.American Sociological Review. 2006;71 (3): 353-375.
40. Michelson WEnvironmental Choice, Human Behavior and Residential Satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press; 1977:.
41. Oldenburg RThe Great Good Place. New York: Paragon House; 1989:.
42. Papacharissi Z.The virtual sphere.New Media Society. 2002;4 (1): 9-27.
43. Putnam RBowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000:.
44. Putnam R,Campbell DEAmerican Grace: How Religion Is Reshaping Our Civic and Political Lives. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2010:.
45. Robinson JP,Martin S.IT use and declining social capital?.Social Science Computer Review. 2010;28 (1): 45-63.
46. Sessions L.How offline gatherings affect online community: When virtual community members 'meetup'.Information, Communication and Society. 2010;13 (3): 375-395.
47. Steinfield C,Ellison NB,Lampe C.Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2008;29 (6): 434-445.
48. Tönnies FCommunity and Society. 1887) Community and Society (1957 edition). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.East Lansing: Michigan State University Press; 1887:.
49. Tufekci ZWho Aquires Friends Through Social Media and Why?. Washington, DC: AAAI press; 2010:.
50. Valenzuela S,Park N,Kee K F.Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation.Journal of Computer-mediated Communication. 2009;14:875-901.
51. Wang H,Wellman B.Social connectivity in America.American Behavioral Scientist. 2010;53 (8): 1148-1169.
52. Wellman B.Physical place and cyber-place: Changing portals and the rise of networked individualism.International Journal for Urban and Regional Research. 2001;25 (2): 227-252.
53. Wellman B,Wortley S.Different strokes from different folks.American Journal of Sociology. 1990;96 (3): 558-588.
54. Wellman B,Quan-Haase A,Witte J,Hampton K N.Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community committment.American Behavioral Scientist. 2001;45 (3): 436-455.
55. WellmanBQuan-HaaseABoaseJChenWHamptonKde DiazI IMiyataK (2003) The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication8(3). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/wellman.html (consulted October 2010).
56. ZhaoS (2006) Do internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of internet use. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication11(3). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/zhao.html (consulted October 2010).