Examining differential gains from internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions

Journal of Communication

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 71-84

  Hardy, Bruce W ^a   Scheufele, Dietram A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNET;

EID: 16344368684     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/55.1.71     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barnhurst, K. G., & Mutz, D. C. (1997). American journalism and the decline in event-centered reporting. Journal of Communication, 47 (4),25-53.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Berry, W. D. (1984). Nonrecursive causal models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Berry, W. D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Blalock, H. M. (1969). Theory construction: From verbal to mathematical formulations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Blydenburgh, J. C. (1971). A controlled experiment to measure the effects of personal contact campaigning. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 15, 365-381.
7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8. Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic Dialogue Campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19, 73-93.
9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S., (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the bebavior sciences (3rd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Holt.
11. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Fishkin, J. S. (1996). Bringing deliberation to democracy. Public Perspective, 7, 1-4.
14. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653-663.
15. Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft [The structural transformation of the public sphere: Inquiry into a category of bourgeois society]. Neuwied, Germany: Luchterhand.
16. Hardy, B. W., & Scheufele, D. A. (2003, November). The web of public opinion: The influence of the World Wide Web on democratic citizenship Paper presented to the 2003 annual convention of the Midwest Association of Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
17. Hill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. (1998). Cyberpolitics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18. James, L. R., & Singh, B. K. (1978) An introduction to the logic, assumptions, and basic analytic procedures of two-stage least squares. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1104-1122.
19. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. New York: Free Press.
20. King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999). Logistical regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137-163.
21. Kramer, G. H. (1970). The effects of precinct-level canvassing on voter behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 560-572.
22. Kraut, R. E., & McConahay, J. B. (1973). How being interviewed affects voting: An experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 398-406.
23. Lemert, J. B. (1981). Does mass comnunication change public opinion after all? A new approach to effects analysis. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
24. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace "revolution". Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersoral discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
27. Rubin, A. M. (2002). The uses-and-gratification perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 525-548). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Talk or conversation? Dimensions of interpersonal discussion and their implications for participatory democracy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 713-729.
29. Scheufele, D. A. (2001). Democracy for some? How political talk both informs and polarizes the electorate. In R. P. Hart & D. Shaw (Eds.), Communication and U.S. elections: New agendas (pp. 1932). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
30. Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implication for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29, 46-65.
31. Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard Internatiotional Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 55-75.
32. Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American life. New York: Free Press.
33. Sproull, L., & Keisler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organization communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
34. Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. (1999, May). Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions ofa national newspaper. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
35. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Comunication Research, 57, 52-90.
36. Whittaker, S. (2003). Theories and methods in mediated communication. In A. C. Greasser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 243-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Zaller, J. R. (1990). Political awareness, elite, opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 125-153.